From: "Das, Nirmoy" <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: andi.shyti@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
andrzej.hajda@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Set I915_BO_ALLOC_USER for framebuffer
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:31:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1be8dfd-ea15-15f8-c51c-759221be4188@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <866f81b4-1968-95f8-49be-95b4927d8170@intel.com>
Hi Matt,
On 3/6/2023 1:25 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 06/03/2023 12:07, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>> Framebuffer is exposed to userspace so set I915_BO_ALLOC_USER
>> flag for it. This also make sure that ttm allocates offset
>> for lmem objects.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c | 4 +++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 3 ++-
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c
>> index ad1a37b515fb..2e6238881860 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c
>> @@ -254,7 +254,9 @@ intel_dpt_create(struct intel_framebuffer *fb)
>> size = round_up(size * sizeof(gen8_pte_t), I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE);
>> - dpt_obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(i915, size,
>> I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
>> + dpt_obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(i915, size,
>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS |
>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_USER);
>
> AFAICT this is just some driver internal stuff for display page-table,
> which gets mapped through GGTT or something, and is not the actual fb.
> Is it really exposed to the user?
I misunderstood this for something else. I will remove this.
>
>> if (IS_ERR(dpt_obj) && i915_ggtt_has_aperture(to_gt(i915)->ggtt))
>> dpt_obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(i915, size);
>> if (IS_ERR(dpt_obj) && !HAS_LMEM(i915)) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
>> index 3659350061a7..98ae3a3a986a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
>> @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ static int intelfb_alloc(struct drm_fb_helper
>> *helper,
>> obj = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> if (HAS_LMEM(dev_priv)) {
>> obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(dev_priv, size,
>> - I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS |
>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_USER);
>> } else {
>> /*
>> * If the FB is too big, just don't use it since fbdev is
>> not very
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
>> index bb6ea7de5c61..4a3680f6a3f5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
>> @@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ initial_plane_vma(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> size * 2 > i915->dsm.usable_size)
>> return NULL;
>> - obj = i915_gem_object_create_region_at(mem, phys_base, size, 0);
>> + obj = i915_gem_object_create_region_at(mem, phys_base, size,
>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_USER);
>
> ALLOC_USER has the side effect of also zeroing the memory underneath,
> IIRC. However this here is the pre-allocated fb (will have some boot
> logo stuff), so we shouldn't ever clear it.
This was my concern. I wonder if there is any other better way than to
use a temp buffer to copy the pre-allocated content and put it back
after getting i915_gem_object_create_region_at().
Regards,
Nirmoy
>
>> if (IS_ERR(obj))
>> return NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-06 12:07 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Set I915_BO_ALLOC_USER for framebuffer Nirmoy Das
2023-03-06 12:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Add a helper func for gem obj mmap Nirmoy Das
2023-03-06 12:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v2 3/3] drm/i915/display: Implement fb_mmap callback function Nirmoy Das
2023-03-06 12:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Set I915_BO_ALLOC_USER for framebuffer Matthew Auld
2023-03-06 13:31 ` Das, Nirmoy [this message]
2023-03-06 13:49 ` Matthew Auld
2023-03-06 13:54 ` Das, Nirmoy
2023-03-06 12:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-06 10:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] " Nirmoy Das
2023-03-06 14:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-06 16:22 ` Das, Nirmoy
2023-03-06 17:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-07 7:20 ` Das, Nirmoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1be8dfd-ea15-15f8-c51c-759221be4188@linux.intel.com \
--to=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@intel.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox