From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: "Das, Nirmoy" <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com>,
Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: andi.shyti@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
andrzej.hajda@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Set I915_BO_ALLOC_USER for framebuffer
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 13:49:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecbc4fda-b395-0ad5-ff3d-d681df5bb060@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1be8dfd-ea15-15f8-c51c-759221be4188@linux.intel.com>
On 06/03/2023 13:31, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On 3/6/2023 1:25 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> On 06/03/2023 12:07, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>>> Framebuffer is exposed to userspace so set I915_BO_ALLOC_USER
>>> flag for it. This also make sure that ttm allocates offset
>>> for lmem objects.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c | 4 +++-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c | 3 ++-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c | 3 ++-
>>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c
>>> index ad1a37b515fb..2e6238881860 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c
>>> @@ -254,7 +254,9 @@ intel_dpt_create(struct intel_framebuffer *fb)
>>> size = round_up(size * sizeof(gen8_pte_t), I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE);
>>> - dpt_obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(i915, size,
>>> I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
>>> + dpt_obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(i915, size,
>>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS |
>>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_USER);
>>
>> AFAICT this is just some driver internal stuff for display page-table,
>> which gets mapped through GGTT or something, and is not the actual fb.
>> Is it really exposed to the user?
>
>
> I misunderstood this for something else. I will remove this.
>
>>
>>> if (IS_ERR(dpt_obj) && i915_ggtt_has_aperture(to_gt(i915)->ggtt))
>>> dpt_obj = i915_gem_object_create_stolen(i915, size);
>>> if (IS_ERR(dpt_obj) && !HAS_LMEM(i915)) {
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
>>> index 3659350061a7..98ae3a3a986a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbdev.c
>>> @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ static int intelfb_alloc(struct drm_fb_helper
>>> *helper,
>>> obj = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>> if (HAS_LMEM(dev_priv)) {
>>> obj = i915_gem_object_create_lmem(dev_priv, size,
>>> - I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS);
>>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS |
>>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_USER);
>>> } else {
>>> /*
>>> * If the FB is too big, just don't use it since fbdev is
>>> not very
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
>>> index bb6ea7de5c61..4a3680f6a3f5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_plane_initial.c
>>> @@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ initial_plane_vma(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>> size * 2 > i915->dsm.usable_size)
>>> return NULL;
>>> - obj = i915_gem_object_create_region_at(mem, phys_base, size, 0);
>>> + obj = i915_gem_object_create_region_at(mem, phys_base, size,
>>> + I915_BO_ALLOC_USER);
>>
>> ALLOC_USER has the side effect of also zeroing the memory underneath,
>> IIRC. However this here is the pre-allocated fb (will have some boot
>> logo stuff), so we shouldn't ever clear it.
>
>
> This was my concern. I wonder if there is any other better way than to
> use a temp buffer to copy the pre-allocated content and put it back
> after getting i915_gem_object_create_region_at().
If we need ALLOC_USER for this buffer then maybe just a new flag like
BO_PREALLOCATED which skips all the clearing?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
>
>>
>>> if (IS_ERR(obj))
>>> return NULL;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-06 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-06 12:07 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Set I915_BO_ALLOC_USER for framebuffer Nirmoy Das
2023-03-06 12:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Add a helper func for gem obj mmap Nirmoy Das
2023-03-06 12:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RFC v2 3/3] drm/i915/display: Implement fb_mmap callback function Nirmoy Das
2023-03-06 12:25 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Set I915_BO_ALLOC_USER for framebuffer Matthew Auld
2023-03-06 13:31 ` Das, Nirmoy
2023-03-06 13:49 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2023-03-06 13:54 ` Das, Nirmoy
2023-03-06 12:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/3] " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-06 10:28 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] " Nirmoy Das
2023-03-06 14:21 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-06 16:22 ` Das, Nirmoy
2023-03-06 17:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-07 7:20 ` Das, Nirmoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ecbc4fda-b395-0ad5-ff3d-d681df5bb060@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@intel.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nirmoy.das@intel.com \
--cc=nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox