From: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
To: "Michał Grzelak" <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
Cc: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Nemesa Garg" <nemesa.garg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/casf: Move the casf state to better place
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 12:02:22 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e23a0dc1-832a-db15-0166-5ac29105fde5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e65216e2-461a-9286-644c-1653d12aad87@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13756 bytes --]
On Sat, 28 Mar 2026, Michał Grzelak wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2026, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Michał Grzelak wrote:
>>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2026, Ville Syrjala wrote:
>>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> The casf state is placed inside the 'hw' state for some reason.
>>>> That is only really meant for things we have to duplicate from
>>>> the uapi state. The rest can live on its own in our actual state.
>>>>
>>>> And since casf is just one aspect of the pfit/pipe scaler the
>>>> proper place for it seems to be under pch_pfit.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c | 40 +++++++++----------
>>>> .../drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c | 6 +--
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 12 +++---
>>>> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 2 +-
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c | 4 +-
>>>> 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c
>>>> index 4316d8214e80..5a8ffb40d30d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_casf.c
>>>> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ void intel_casf_update_strength(struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *crtc_state)
>>>> int win_size;
>>>>
>>>> intel_de_rmw(display, SHARPNESS_CTL(crtc->pipe),
>>>> FILTER_STRENGTH_MASK,
>>>> - FILTER_STRENGTH(crtc_state->hw.casf_params.strength));
>>>> + FILTER_STRENGTH(crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.strength));
>>>>
>>>> win_size = intel_de_read(display, SKL_PS_WIN_SZ(crtc->pipe, 1));
>>>>
>>>> @@ -95,11 +95,11 @@ static void intel_casf_compute_win_size(struct
>>>> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>>> u32 total_pixels = mode->hdisplay * mode->vdisplay;
>>>>
>>>> if (total_pixels <= MAX_PIXELS_FOR_3_TAP_FILTER)
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.win_size =
>>>> SHARPNESS_FILTER_SIZE_3X3;
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.win_size =
>>>> SHARPNESS_FILTER_SIZE_3X3;
>>>> else if (total_pixels <= MAX_PIXELS_FOR_5_TAP_FILTER)
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.win_size =
>>>> SHARPNESS_FILTER_SIZE_5X5;
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.win_size =
>>>> SHARPNESS_FILTER_SIZE_5X5;
>>>> else
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.win_size =
>>>> SHARPNESS_FILTER_SIZE_7X7;
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.win_size =
>>>> SHARPNESS_FILTER_SIZE_7X7;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> int intel_casf_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>>> @@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ int intel_casf_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *crtc_state)
>>>> return 0;
>>>>
>>>> if (crtc_state->hw.sharpness_strength == 0) {
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.enable = false;
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.strength = 0;
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.enable = false;
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.strength = 0;
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int intel_casf_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *crtc_state)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.enable = true;
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.enable = true;
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * HW takes a value in form (1.0 + strength) in 4.4 fixed format.
>>>> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ int intel_casf_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *crtc_state)
>>>> * 6.3125 in 4.4 format is b01100101 which is equal to 101.
>>>> * Also 85 + 16 = 101.
>>>> */
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.strength =
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.strength =
>>>> min(crtc_state->hw.sharpness_strength, 0xEF) + 0x10;
>>>>
>>>> intel_casf_compute_win_size(crtc_state);
>>>> @@ -151,19 +151,19 @@ void intel_casf_sharpness_get_config(struct
>>>> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>>> if (sharp & FILTER_EN) {
>>>> if (drm_WARN_ON(display->drm,
>>>> REG_FIELD_GET(FILTER_STRENGTH_MASK, sharp) <
>>>> 16))
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.strength = 0;
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.strength = 0;
>>>> else
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.strength =
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.strength =
>>>> REG_FIELD_GET(FILTER_STRENGTH_MASK, sharp);
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.enable = true;
>>>> - crtc_state->hw.casf_params.win_size =
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.enable = true;
>>>> + crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.win_size =
>>>> REG_FIELD_GET(FILTER_SIZE_MASK, sharp);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> bool intel_casf_needs_scaler(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>>> {
>>>> - if (crtc_state->hw.casf_params.enable)
>>>> + if (crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.enable)
>>>> return true;
>>>>
>>>> return false;
>>>> @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static u32 casf_coeff(struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *crtc_state, int t)
>>>> struct scaler_filter_coeff value;
>>>> u32 coeff;
>>>>
>>>> - value = crtc_state->hw.casf_params.coeff[t];
>>>> + value = crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.coeff[t];
>>>
>>> Unrelated topic: how you see such renaming?:
>>>
>>> int t -> int tap
>>
>> Probably a good idea. One character variable names aren't what
>> you'd call descriptive. This probably got copied from the
>> nearest neighbor filter code, so a rename should happen there too.
>>
>> Or even better if someone gets rid of the duplicated code entirely
>> and consolidates all the filter coefficient code to one place.
>
> I'd give it a shot but I genuinely don't know where to search for
> nearest neighbor filter. I searched for possible declarations of int t,
> but it didn't show anything relevant. Can you point to where should I
> start looking?
Nevermind the question, apparently I crossed my eyes when looking at
cscope's search. *facepalm*.
BR,
Michał
>>>> value.sign = 0;
>>>>
>>>> coeff = value.sign << 15 | value.exp << 12 | value.mantissa << 3;
>>>> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static u32 casf_coeff(struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *crtc_state, int t)
>>>> /*
>>>> * 17 phase of 7 taps requires 119 coefficients in 60 dwords per set.
>>>> * To enable casf: program scaler coefficients with the coeffients
>>>> - * that are calculated and stored in hw.casf_params.coeff as per
>>>> + * that are calculated and stored in pch_pfit.casf.coeff as per
>>>> * SCALER_COEFFICIENT_FORMAT
>>>> */
>>>> static void intel_casf_write_coeff(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>>> @@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ void intel_casf_scaler_compute_config(struct
>>>> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>>> u16 sumcoeff = 0;
>>>
>>> Unrelated to the change: some variables have been named as sumcoeff and
>>> others as filter_*coeff{_1,_2,_3}*. How you see renaming:
>>>
>>> u16 sumcoeff -> u16 sum_coeff
>>>
>>> But I might be again missing common codestyle.
>>
>> We generally use the underscore_style for things. So I wouldn't
>> mind the rename.
>
> In that case I should probably rename filtercoeff as well. But since
> filter_coeff is already used and global, I guess it would require more
> vigilance then the simple rename above. Do you have any hints on how to
> handle it without breaking everything?
>
> BR,
> Michał
>
>>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Michał Grzelak <michal.grzelak@intel.com>
>>
>> Ta.
>>
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Michał
>>>
>>>> int i;
>>>>
>>>> - if (crtc_state->hw.casf_params.win_size == 0)
>>>> + if (crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.win_size == 0)
>>>> filtercoeff = filtercoeff_1;
>>>> - else if (crtc_state->hw.casf_params.win_size == 1)
>>>> + else if (crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.win_size == 1)
>>>> filtercoeff = filtercoeff_2;
>>>> else
>>>> filtercoeff = filtercoeff_3;
>>>> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ void intel_casf_scaler_compute_config(struct
>>>> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < SCALER_FILTER_NUM_TAPS; i++) {
>>>> filter_coeff[i] = (*(filtercoeff + i) * 100 / sumcoeff);
>>>> -
>>>> convert_sharpness_coef_binary(&crtc_state->hw.casf_params.coeff[i],
>>>> +
>>>> convert_sharpness_coef_binary(&crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.coeff[i],
>>>> filter_coeff[i]);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -274,9 +274,9 @@ void intel_casf_enable(struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *crtc_state)
>>>>
>>>> intel_casf_write_coeff(crtc_state);
>>>>
>>>> - sharpness_ctl = FILTER_EN |
>>>> FILTER_STRENGTH(crtc_state->hw.casf_params.strength);
>>>> + sharpness_ctl = FILTER_EN |
>>>> FILTER_STRENGTH(crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.strength);
>>>>
>>>> - sharpness_ctl |= crtc_state->hw.casf_params.win_size;
>>>> + sharpness_ctl |= crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.win_size;
>>>>
>>>> intel_de_write(display, SHARPNESS_CTL(crtc->pipe), sharpness_ctl);
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
>>>> index 10a9b51337fa..95993f8e5d0d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_crtc_state_dump.c
>>>> @@ -382,9 +382,9 @@ void intel_crtc_state_dump(const struct
>>>> intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
>>>> intel_vdsc_state_dump(&p, 0, pipe_config);
>>>>
>>>> drm_printf(&p, "sharpness strength: %d, sharpness tap size: %d,
>>>> sharpness enable: %d\n",
>>>> - pipe_config->hw.casf_params.strength,
>>>> - pipe_config->hw.casf_params.win_size,
>>>> - pipe_config->hw.casf_params.enable);
>>>> + pipe_config->pch_pfit.casf.strength,
>>>> + pipe_config->pch_pfit.casf.win_size,
>>>> + pipe_config->pch_pfit.casf.enable);
>>>>
>>>> dump_planes:
>>>> if (!state)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>>> index a02c58b5a34d..e02e69467871 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>>>> @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@ static bool intel_casf_enabling(const struct
>>>> intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state,
>>>> if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
>>>> return false;
>>>>
>>>> - return is_enabling(hw.casf_params.enable, old_crtc_state,
>>>> new_crtc_state);
>>>> + return is_enabling(pch_pfit.casf.enable, old_crtc_state,
>>>> new_crtc_state);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static bool intel_casf_disabling(const struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *old_crtc_state,
>>>> @@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ static bool intel_casf_disabling(const struct
>>>> intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
>>>> if (!new_crtc_state->hw.active)
>>>> return false;
>>>>
>>>> - return is_disabling(hw.casf_params.enable, old_crtc_state,
>>>> new_crtc_state);
>>>> + return is_disabling(pch_pfit.casf.enable, old_crtc_state,
>>>> new_crtc_state);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static bool intel_crtc_lobf_enabling(const struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *old_crtc_state,
>>>> @@ -5370,12 +5370,12 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(const struct
>>>> intel_crtc_state *current_config,
>>>>
>>>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(pch_pfit.enabled);
>>>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_RECT(pch_pfit.dst);
>>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(pch_pfit.casf.enable);
>>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pch_pfit.casf.win_size);
>>>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pch_pfit.casf.strength);
>>>>
>>>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(scaler_state.scaler_id);
>>>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(pixel_rate);
>>>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_BOOL(hw.casf_params.enable);
>>>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.casf_params.win_size);
>>>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(hw.casf_params.strength);
>>>>
>>>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(gamma_mode);
>>>> if (display->platform.cherryview)
>>>> @@ -6819,7 +6819,7 @@ static void intel_pre_update_crtc(struct
>>>> intel_atomic_state *state,
>>>>
>>>> if (intel_casf_enabling(new_crtc_state, old_crtc_state))
>>>> intel_casf_enable(new_crtc_state);
>>>> - else if (new_crtc_state->hw.casf_params.strength !=
>>>> old_crtc_state->hw.casf_params.strength)
>>>> + else if (new_crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.strength !=
>>>> old_crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.strength)
>>>> intel_casf_update_strength(new_crtc_state);
>>>>
>>>> intel_fbc_update(state, crtc);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>>>> index af0d870de342..ca2581fb7bbd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
>>>> @@ -1037,7 +1037,6 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
>>>> struct drm_display_mode mode, pipe_mode, adjusted_mode;
>>>> enum drm_scaling_filter scaling_filter;
>>>> u8 sharpness_strength;
>>>> - struct intel_casf casf_params;
>>>> } hw;
>>>>
>>>> /* actual state of LUTs */
>>>> @@ -1224,6 +1223,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
>>>>
>>>> /* Panel fitter placement and size for Ironlake+ */
>>>> struct {
>>>> + struct intel_casf casf;
>>>> struct drm_rect dst;
>>>> bool enabled;
>>>> bool force_thru;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
>>>> index cfa17ddb4018..e9fe5c0bf6ff 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_scaler.c
>>>> @@ -986,13 +986,13 @@ void skl_scaler_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state
>>>> *crtc_state)
>>>> if (HAS_CASF(display) && id == 1)
>>>> intel_casf_sharpness_get_config(crtc_state);
>>>>
>>>> - if (!crtc_state->hw.casf_params.enable)
>>>> + if (!crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.enable)
>>>> crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled = true;
>>>>
>>>> pos = intel_de_read(display, SKL_PS_WIN_POS(crtc->pipe, i));
>>>> size = intel_de_read(display, SKL_PS_WIN_SZ(crtc->pipe, i));
>>>>
>>>> - if (!crtc_state->hw.casf_params.enable)
>>>> + if (!crtc_state->pch_pfit.casf.enable)
>>>> drm_rect_init(&crtc_state->pch_pfit.dst,
>>>> REG_FIELD_GET(PS_WIN_XPOS_MASK, pos),
>>>> REG_FIELD_GET(PS_WIN_YPOS_MASK, pos),
>>>> --
>>>> 2.52.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ville Syrjälä
>> Intel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 22:31 [PATCH 0/9] drm/i915/casf: Integrate the sharpness filter properly into the scaler code Ville Syrjala
2026-03-26 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915/casf: s/casf_enable/enable/ Ville Syrjala
2026-03-27 8:41 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-26 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/casf: Make a proper hw state copy of the sharpness_strength Ville Syrjala
2026-03-27 8:46 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-26 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/casf: Move the casf state to better place Ville Syrjala
2026-03-27 9:10 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-27 10:30 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-03-28 15:34 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-04-01 10:02 ` Michał Grzelak [this message]
2026-03-26 22:31 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/casf: Extract scaler_has_casf() Ville Syrjala
2026-03-27 9:33 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-27 10:06 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-27 10:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-03-28 14:52 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-26 22:31 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/casf: Handle CASF in skl_scaler_get_filter_select() Ville Syrjala
2026-03-27 9:35 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-26 22:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/casf: Constify crtc_state Ville Syrjala
2026-03-27 9:44 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-26 22:31 ` [PATCH 7/9] drn/i915/casf: Remove redundant argument from intel_casf_filter_lut_load() Ville Syrjala
2026-03-27 9:46 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-28 16:04 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-26 22:31 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/pfit: Call intel_pfit_compute_config() unconditionally on (e)DP/HDMI Ville Syrjala
2026-03-27 9:48 ` Michał Grzelak
2026-03-27 10:31 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-03-26 22:31 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/casf: Integrate the sharpness filter properly into the scaler code Ville Syrjala
2026-03-31 8:11 ` Garg, Nemesa
2026-03-31 9:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-03-31 9:48 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-03-31 13:33 ` Garg, Nemesa
2026-03-26 23:26 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-03-28 0:01 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-03-31 11:40 ` [PATCH 0/9] " Sharma, Swati2
2026-03-31 12:34 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-01 6:02 ` Sharma, Swati2
2026-04-01 11:54 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-02 6:04 ` Sharma, Swati2
2026-04-27 15:31 ` Sharma, Swati2
2026-03-31 16:44 ` Garg, Nemesa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e23a0dc1-832a-db15-0166-5ac29105fde5@intel.com \
--to=michal.grzelak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nemesa.garg@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox