From: "Shankar, Uma" <uma.shankar@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [v4 1/2] drm/i915/display/tgl: Disable FBC with PSR2
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:00:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5319acc210348b9aa4e2697295be824@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bb7468a0b8f43258d7e01a64fee31f682fd5737.camel@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Souza, Jose <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 9:25 PM
> To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [v4 1/2] drm/i915/display/tgl: Disable FBC with PSR2
>
> On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 07:51 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 20:00 +0530, Uma Shankar wrote:
> > > There are some corner cases wrt underrun when we enable FBC with
> > > PSR2 on TGL. Recommendation from hardware is to keep this
> > > combination disabled.
> > >
> > > Bspec: 50422 HSD: 14010260002
> > >
> > > v2: Added psr2 enabled check from crtc_state (Anshuman) Added Bspec
> > > link and HSD referneces (Jose)
> > >
> > > v3: Moved the logic to disable fbc to intel_fbc_update_state_cache
> > > and removed the crtc->config usages, as per Ville's recommendation.
> > >
> > > v4: Introduced a variable in fbc state_cache instead of the earlier
> > > plane.visible WA, as suggested by Jose.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> > > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > > index a5b072816a7b..ff2f2c00a10e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
> > > @@ -700,7 +700,21 @@ static void intel_fbc_update_state_cache(struct
> intel_crtc *crtc,
> > > struct intel_fbc_state_cache *cache = &fbc->state_cache;
> > > struct drm_framebuffer *fb = plane_state->hw.fb;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > + if (crtc_state->has_psr2)
> > > + cache->psr2_active = true;
> > > + else
> > > + cache->psr2_active = false;
> >
> > cache->psr2_active = crtc_state->has_psr2;
Yeah sure, will update this.
> >
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Tigerlake is not supporting FBC with PSR2.
> > > + * Recommendation is to keep this combination disabled
> > > + * Bspec: 50422 HSD: 14010260002
> > > + */
> > > + if (IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv) && cache->psr2_active)
> > > + return;
> >
> >
> > Here you should only set psr2_active, add it to the bottom of
> intel_fbc_update_state_cache.
> > The check should only be done in intel_fbc_can_activate().
Ok, I will drop the explicit return here.
> > > +
> > > cache->plane.visible = plane_state->uapi.visible;
> > > +
> > > if (!cache->plane.visible)
> > > return;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > @@ -799,6 +813,16 @@ static bool intel_fbc_can_activate(struct intel_crtc
> *crtc)
> > > struct intel_fbc *fbc = &dev_priv->fbc;
> > > struct intel_fbc_state_cache *cache = &fbc->state_cache;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Tigerlake is not supporting FBC with PSR2.
> > > + * Recommendation is to keep this combination disabled
> > > + * Bspec: 50422 HSD: 14010260002
> > > + */
> > > + if (fbc->state_cache.psr2_active && IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > > + fbc->no_fbc_reason = "not supported with PSR2";
> > > + return false;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (!intel_fbc_can_enable(dev_priv))
> > > return false;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > @@ -1273,6 +1297,11 @@ void intel_fbc_enable(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state,
> > > if (!cache->plane.visible)
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > + if (fbc->state_cache.psr2_active && IS_TIGERLAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > > + fbc->no_fbc_reason = "not supported with PSR2";
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
>
> Also no need to check it here, only in intel_fbc_can_activate.
> We already allocate the cfb even when other reasons do not allow FBC to be
> activated.
Ok got it, will drop the check here as well.
Thanks Jose for the feedback, will re-send the next version with updates.
Regards,
Uma Shankar
> > > +
> > > if (intel_fbc_alloc_cfb(dev_priv,
> > > intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size(dev_priv, cache),
> > > plane_state->hw.fb->format->cpp[0])) { diff --git
> > > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > index 15be8debae54..f4e08c1a5867 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > @@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ struct intel_fbc {
> > > u16 gen9_wa_cfb_stride;
> > > u16 interval;
> > > s8 fence_id;
> > > + bool psr2_active;
> > > } state_cache;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > /*
> >
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 14:30 [Intel-gfx] [v4 0/2] Re-enable FBC on TGL Uma Shankar
2020-12-01 14:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [v4 1/2] drm/i915/display/tgl: Disable FBC with PSR2 Uma Shankar
2020-12-01 15:51 ` Souza, Jose
2020-12-01 15:55 ` Souza, Jose
2020-12-01 16:00 ` Shankar, Uma [this message]
2020-12-01 14:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [v4 2/2] Revert "drm/i915/display/fbc: Disable fbc by default on TGL" Uma Shankar
2020-12-01 14:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for Re-enable FBC on TGL (rev4) Patchwork
2020-12-01 15:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-12-01 18:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5319acc210348b9aa4e2697295be824@intel.com \
--to=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox