Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hogander, Jouni" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
To: "Murthy, Arun R" <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Add alpm_parameters struct
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:24:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0bb822ce0752c8807867a15f62bff59b7359e55.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IA0PR11MB73072CBB4727F093E9784B18BA7B2@IA0PR11MB7307.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 09:17 +0000, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf
> > Of Jouni
> > Högander
> > Sent: Friday, January 5, 2024 7:45 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Add alpm_parameters struct
> > 
> > Add new alpm_parameters struct into intel_psr for all calculated
> > alpm
> > parameters.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  8 ++++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      | 28 ++++++++++-----
> > ----
> >  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > index b9b9d9f2bc0b..889a8b34b7ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> > @@ -1677,6 +1677,11 @@ struct intel_pps {
> >         struct edp_power_seq bios_pps_delays;
> >  };
> > 
> > +struct alpm_parameters {
> > +       u8 io_wake_lines;
> > +       u8 fast_wake_lines;
> > +};
> Assume that this is being used in PSR as well and can be retained in
> intel_psr struct.
> If exclusively used for alpm then having it in a new alpm struct
> would be better.

Amount of these parameters are about to grow with AUXless ALPM. I was
thinking having own struct would be more clear. Please note that
alpm_params is still under struct intel_psr. What do you think?

BR,

Jouni Högander
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Arun R Murthy
> -------------------
> > +
> >  struct intel_psr {
> >         /* Mutex for PSR state of the transcoder */
> >         struct mutex lock;
> > @@ -1706,8 +1711,6 @@ struct intel_psr {
> >         bool psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled;
> >         bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
> >         u8 sink_sync_latency;
> > -       u8 io_wake_lines;
> > -       u8 fast_wake_lines;
> >         ktime_t last_entry_attempt;
> >         ktime_t last_exit;
> >         bool sink_not_reliable;
> > @@ -1721,6 +1724,7 @@ struct intel_psr {
> >         u32 dc3co_exit_delay;
> >         struct delayed_work dc3co_work;
> >         u8 entry_setup_frames;
> > +       struct alpm_parameters alpm_params;
> >  };
> > 
> >  struct intel_dp {
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > index 54120b45958b..1709ebb31215 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> > @@ -759,8 +759,8 @@ static u32 intel_psr2_get_tp_time(struct
> > intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> > 
> >  static int psr2_block_count_lines(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)  {
> > -       return intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines < 9 &&
> > -               intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines < 9 ? 8 : 12;
> > +       return intel_dp->psr.alpm_params.io_wake_lines < 9 &&
> > +               intel_dp->psr.alpm_params.fast_wake_lines < 9 ? 8 :
> > 12;
> >  }
> > 
> >  static int psr2_block_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) @@ -797,6
> > +797,7 @@
> > static void dg2_activate_panel_replay(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) 
> > static void
> > hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)  {
> >         struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > +       struct alpm_parameters *alpm_params = &intel_dp-
> > >psr.alpm_params;
> >         enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = intel_dp->psr.transcoder;
> >         u32 val = EDP_PSR2_ENABLE;
> >         u32 psr_val = 0;
> > @@ -838,17 +839,17 @@ static void hsw_activate_psr2(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_dp)
> >                  */
> >                 int tmp;
> > 
> > -               tmp = map[intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines -
> > TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> > +               tmp = map[alpm_params->io_wake_lines -
> > +TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> >                 val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(tmp +
> > TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE_MIN_LINES);
> > 
> > -               tmp = map[intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines -
> > TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> > +               tmp = map[alpm_params->fast_wake_lines -
> > +TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES];
> >                 val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(tmp +
> > TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE_MIN_LINES);
> >         } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> > -               val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(intel_dp-
> > > psr.io_wake_lines);
> > -               val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(intel_dp-
> > > psr.fast_wake_lines);
> > +               val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(alpm_params-
> > > io_wake_lines);
> > +               val |= TGL_EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(alpm_params-
> > > fast_wake_lines);
> >         } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 9) {
> > -               val |= EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(intel_dp-
> > > psr.io_wake_lines);
> > -               val |= EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(intel_dp-
> > >psr.fast_wake_lines);
> > +               val |= EDP_PSR2_IO_BUFFER_WAKE(alpm_params-
> > > io_wake_lines);
> > +               val |= EDP_PSR2_FAST_WAKE(alpm_params-
> > >fast_wake_lines);
> >         }
> > 
> >         if (intel_dp->psr.req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline)
> > @@ -1098,10 +1099,11 @@ static bool
> > _compute_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline_indication(struct intel_dp
> > *intel_d
> >         return true;
> >  }
> > 
> > -static bool _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > -                                    struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> > +static bool _compute_alpm_params(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > +                                struct intel_crtc_state
> > *crtc_state)
> >  {
> >         struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > +       struct alpm_parameters *alpm_params = &intel_dp-
> > >psr.alpm_params;
> >         int io_wake_lines, io_wake_time, fast_wake_lines,
> > fast_wake_time;
> >         u8 max_wake_lines;
> > 
> > @@ -1132,8 +1134,8 @@ static bool _compute_psr2_wake_times(struct
> > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >                 io_wake_lines = fast_wake_lines = max_wake_lines;
> > 
> >         /* According to Bspec lower limit should be set as 7 lines.
> > */
> > -       intel_dp->psr.io_wake_lines = max(io_wake_lines, 7);
> > -       intel_dp->psr.fast_wake_lines = max(fast_wake_lines, 7);
> > +       alpm_params->io_wake_lines = max(io_wake_lines, 7);
> > +       alpm_params->fast_wake_lines = max(fast_wake_lines, 7);
> > 
> >         return true;
> >  }
> > @@ -1265,7 +1267,7 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > intel_dp
> > *intel_dp,
> >                 return false;
> >         }
> > 
> > -       if (!_compute_psr2_wake_times(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
> > +       if (!_compute_alpm_params(intel_dp, crtc_state)) {
> >                 drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
> >                             "PSR2 not enabled, Unable to use long
> > enough wake
> > times\n");
> >                 return false;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-24  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-05 14:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] ALPM AUX Wake Configuration Jouni Högander
2024-01-05 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] drm/i915/alpm: Add ALPM register definitions Jouni Högander
2024-01-24  6:16   ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-01-05 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Add alpm_parameters struct Jouni Högander
2024-01-24  9:17   ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-01-24  9:24     ` Hogander, Jouni [this message]
2024-01-24  9:28       ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-01-24  9:39         ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-01-05 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915/alpm: Calculate ALPM Entry check Jouni Högander
2024-01-29  2:08   ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-01-29  7:33     ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-01-05 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915/alpm: Alpm aux wake configuration for lnl Jouni Högander
2024-01-30  8:28   ` Murthy, Arun R
2024-01-30  9:13     ` Hogander, Jouni
2024-01-05 16:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for ALPM AUX Wake Configuration (rev2) Patchwork
2024-01-05 16:10 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-01-05 16:23 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-01-06  9:27 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0bb822ce0752c8807867a15f62bff59b7359e55.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    --cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox