Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] video/aperture: Only remove sysfb on the default vga pci device
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:58:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb72e067-3f5f-1bac-dc9b-3abd9d7739a2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230111154112.90575-11-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Hello Daniel,

On 1/11/23 16:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> This fixes a regression introduced by ee7a69aa38d8 ("fbdev: Disable
> sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs"), where we
> remove the sysfb when loading a driver for an unrelated pci device,
> resulting in the user loosing their efifb console or similar.
> 
> Note that in practice this only is a problem with the nvidia blob,
> because that's the only gpu driver people might install which does not
> come with an fbdev driver of it's own. For everyone else the real gpu
> driver will restor a working console.

restore

> 
> Also note that in the referenced bug there's confusion that this same
> bug also happens on amdgpu. But that was just another amdgpu specific
> regression, which just happened to happen at roughly the same time and
> with the same user-observable symptons. That bug is fixed now, see

symptoms

> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216331#c15
> 
> For the above reasons the cc: stable is just notionally, this patch
> will need a backport and that's up to nvidia if they care enough.
> 

Maybe adding a Fixes: ee7a69aa38d8 tag here too ?

> References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216303#c28
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.19+ (if someone else does the backport)
> ---
>  drivers/video/aperture.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/aperture.c b/drivers/video/aperture.c
> index ba565515480d..a1821d369bb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/aperture.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/aperture.c
> @@ -321,15 +321,16 @@ int aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices(struct pci_dev *pdev, const char *na
>  
>  	primary = pdev == vga_default_device();
>  
> +	if (primary)
> +		sysfb_disable();
> +
>  	for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; ++bar) {
>  		if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, bar) & IORESOURCE_MEM))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		base = pci_resource_start(pdev, bar);
>  		size = pci_resource_len(pdev, bar);
> -		ret = aperture_remove_conflicting_devices(base, size, name);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> +		aperture_detach_devices(base, size);

Maybe mention in the commit message that you are doing this change, something like:

"Instead of calling aperture_remove_conflicting_devices() to remove the conflicting
devices, just call to aperture_detach_devices() to detach the device that matches
the same PCI BAR / aperture range. Since the former is just a wrapper of the latter
plus a sysfb_disable() call, and now that's done in this function but only for the
primary devices"

Patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-11 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-11 15:41 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/ast: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/gma500: " Daniel Vetter
2023-01-12  9:04   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-12  9:59     ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-12 10:24       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-12 10:45         ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-12 12:15           ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-12 15:32             ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/aperture: Remove primary argument Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:49   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] video/aperture: use generic code to figure out the vga default device Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:59   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 16:51     ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] video/aperture: Only kick vgacon when the pdev is decoding vga Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 16:03   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 16:55     ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] staging/lynxfb: Use pci aperture helper Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 16:05   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] fbdev/radeon: use pci aperture helpers Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] fbdev/hyperv: " Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] video/aperture: Move vga handling to pci function Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] video/aperture: Drop primary argument Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 16:09   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] video/aperture: Only remove sysfb on the default vga pci device Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 16:20   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 16:37     ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-12  7:48       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 16:43     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-01-11 16:58   ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2023-01-11 19:21     ` Aaron Plattner
2023-01-12  7:55       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-12  8:44         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2023-01-11 15:48 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/ast: Use drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_framebuffers Thomas Zimmermann
2023-01-11 17:02   ` Daniel Vetter
2023-01-11 16:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] " Patchwork
2023-01-11 16:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-01-12  9:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] " Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-04 14:45 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2023-04-18  0:53   ` Jammy Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fb72e067-3f5f-1bac-dc9b-3abd9d7739a2@redhat.com \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=aplattner@nvidia.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox