public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:19:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fce64eec-7910-85c8-7300-6736552eafc4@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124114219.29020-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 24/11/2020 11:42, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Pull the repeated check for the last active request being completed to a
> single spot, when deciding whether or not execlist preemption is
> required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 15 ++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index cf11cbac241b..43703efb36d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -2141,12 +2141,9 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   	 */
>   
>   	if ((last = *active)) {
> -		if (need_preempt(engine, last, rb)) {
> -			if (i915_request_completed(last)) {
> -				tasklet_hi_schedule(&execlists->tasklet);
> -				return;
> -			}
> -
> +		if (i915_request_completed(last)) {
> +			goto check_secondary;
> +		} else if (need_preempt(engine, last, rb)) {
>   			ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
>   				     "preempting last=%llx:%lld, prio=%d, hint=%d\n",
>   				     last->fence.context,
> @@ -2174,11 +2171,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   			last = NULL;
>   		} else if (need_timeslice(engine, last, rb) &&
>   			   timeslice_expired(execlists, last)) {
> -			if (i915_request_completed(last)) {
> -				tasklet_hi_schedule(&execlists->tasklet);
> -				return;
> -			}
> -
>   			ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
>   				     "expired last=%llx:%lld, prio=%d, hint=%d, yield?=%s\n",
>   				     last->fence.context,
> @@ -2214,6 +2206,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   			 * we hopefully coalesce several updates into a single
>   			 * submission.
>   			 */
> +check_secondary:
>   			if (!list_is_last(&last->sched.link,
>   					  &engine->active.requests)) {

Is there a tasklet_hi_schedule in here? I see set_timeslice in my checkout.

Regards,

Tvrtko

>   				/*
> 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-24 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-24 11:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/gem: Drop free_work for GEM contexts Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/gt: Track the overall awake/busy time Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/gt: Protect context lifetime with RCU Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/gt: Split the breadcrumb spinlock between global and contexts Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/gt: Move the breadcrumb to the signaler if completed upon cancel Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 16:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 16:30     ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 17:02       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-25 19:56   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2020-11-26 11:32     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/gt: Decouple completed requests on unwind Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 17:13   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 17:31     ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-25  9:15       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-25 10:21         ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-25 16:21           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 17:19   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2020-11-24 17:38     ` Chris Wilson
2020-11-25  8:59       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/gt: ce->inflight updates are now serialised Chris Wilson
2020-11-25  9:34   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/gt: Defer schedule_out until after the next dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/gt: Remove virtual breadcrumb before transfer Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/gt: Shrink the critical section for irq signaling Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/gt: Simplify virtual engine handling for execlists_hold() Chris Wilson
2020-11-24 14:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/16] drm/i915/gem: Drop free_work for GEM contexts Patchwork
2020-11-24 14:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-11-24 14:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-11-24 18:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-11-25 21:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/16] drm/i915/gem: Drop free_work for GEM contexts (rev2) Patchwork
2020-11-25 21:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-11-25 21:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-11-25 23:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fce64eec-7910-85c8-7300-6736552eafc4@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox