From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 11/15] i40e/i40evf: Enable support for SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:18:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160202151807.0000708b@unknown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160202151000.00004aee@unknown>
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:10:00 -0800
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:49:24 -0800
> Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> wrote:
>
> And, isn't this patch missing the check that enables outer UDP only in
> the case of X722?
>
> I expected to see an i40e_main.c change to tell the stack we support
> UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM only on X722.
Doh, I see it now in patch 13/15.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-02 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 5:16 [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 00/15] TSO and checksum fixes for i40e Alexander Duyck
2016-01-25 5:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 01/15] i40e/i40evf: Drop outer checksum offload that was not requested Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 16:00 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 02/15] i40e/i40evf: Use u64 values instead of casting them in TSO function Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 16:03 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 03/15] i40e/i40evf: Factor out L4 header and checksum from L3 bits in TSO path Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 16:09 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 04/15] i40e/i40evf: Consolidate all header changes into TSO function Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 16:14 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 05/15] i40e/i40evf: Replace header pointers with unions of pointers in Tx checksum path Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 16:27 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 06/15] i40e/i40evf: Add support for IPv4 encapsulated in IPv6 Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 18:04 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 07/15] i40e/i40evf: Handle IPv6 extension headers in checksum offload Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 18:05 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 08/15] i40e/i40evf: Do not write to descriptor unless we complete Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 18:07 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 09/15] i40e/i40evf: Add exception handling for Tx checksum Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 18:08 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 10/15] i40e/i40evf: Clean-up Rx packet checksum handling Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 18:09 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 11/15] i40e/i40evf: Enable support for SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL_CSUM Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 18:17 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-02-02 22:49 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2016-02-02 23:10 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2016-02-02 23:18 ` Jesse Brandeburg [this message]
2016-02-03 0:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-25 5:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 12/15] i40e: Fix ATR in relation to tunnels Alexander Duyck
2016-01-25 19:27 ` Patil, Kiran
2016-01-25 22:21 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-01-26 0:16 ` Patil, Kiran
2016-01-27 18:18 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 13/15] i40e: Do not drop support for IPv6 VXLAN or GENEVE tunnels Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 18:26 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 14/15] i40e: Update feature flags to reflect newly enabled features Alexander Duyck
2016-01-27 18:44 ` Bowers, AndrewX
2016-01-25 5:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH v3 15/15] i40evf: " Alexander Duyck
2016-01-25 19:43 ` Singhai, Anjali
2016-01-27 18:45 ` Bowers, AndrewX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160202151807.0000708b@unknown \
--to=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox