From: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] I225-V (igc driver) hangs after resume in igc_resume/igc_tsn_reset
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 14:03:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3198206.44csPzL39Z@saruman> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4755499.31r3eYUQgx@saruman>
Hi,
On Thursday, 28 July 2022 18:36:31 BST James Hogan wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 July 2022 15:37:09 BST Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> > Yeah, I agree that it seems like the issue is something else. I would
> > suggest start with the "simple" things, enabling 'CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING'
> > and looking at the first splat, it could be that what you are seeing is
> > caused by a deadlock somewhere else.
>
> This is revealing I think (re-enabled PCIE_PTM and enabled PROVE_LOCKING).
>
> In this case it happened within minutes of boot, but a few previous attempts
> with several suspend cycles with the same kernel didn't detect the same
> thing.
I hate to nag, but any thoughts on the lockdep recursive locking warning
below? It seems to indicate a recursive taking of rtnl_mutex in dev_ethtool
and igc_resume, which would certainly seem to point the finger squarely back at
the igc driver.
All the best,
James
>
> NetworkManager[857]: <info> [1659028974.1752] device (enp6s0): state
> change: activated -> unavailable (reason 'carrier-changed',
> sys-iface-state: 'managed')
>
> ============================================
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> 5.18.12-arch1-1 #2 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------
> NetworkManager/857 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffffffff9f9e9048 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: igc_resume+0xf6/0x1d0 [igc]
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffffffff9f9e9048 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_ethtool+0xaf/0x3080
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(rtnl_mutex);
> lock(rtnl_mutex);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
> May be due to missing lock nesting notation
> 1 lock held by NetworkManager/857:
> #0: ffffffff9f9e9048 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_ethtool+0xaf/0x3080
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 857 Comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 5.18.12-arch1-1 #2
> 369425cead7bf2331cd4c5d2279465ad4a0fc21f Hardware name: Micro-Star
> International Co., Ltd. MS-7D25/PRO Z690-A DDR4(MS-7D25), BIOS 1.40
> 05/17/2022 Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x5f/0x78
> __lock_acquire.cold+0xd4/0x2e5
> ? __lock_acquire+0x3b2/0x1fd0
> lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2d0
> ? igc_resume+0xf6/0x1d0 [igc beed6d83546b18fcf82fbbfaeea59871823bceeb]
> ? lock_is_held_type+0xaa/0x120
> __mutex_lock+0xb6/0x830
> ? igc_resume+0xf6/0x1d0 [igc beed6d83546b18fcf82fbbfaeea59871823bceeb]
> ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xdd/0x180
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x50
> ? igc_resume+0xf6/0x1d0 [igc beed6d83546b18fcf82fbbfaeea59871823bceeb]
> ? igc_resume+0xf6/0x1d0 [igc beed6d83546b18fcf82fbbfaeea59871823bceeb]
> igc_resume+0xf6/0x1d0 [igc beed6d83546b18fcf82fbbfaeea59871823bceeb]
> pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xab/0xd0
> ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0xe0/0xe0
> __rpm_callback+0x41/0x160
> rpm_callback+0x35/0x70
> ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0xe0/0xe0
> rpm_resume+0x5eb/0x820
> __pm_runtime_resume+0x4b/0x80
> dev_ethtool+0x128/0x3080
> ? lock_is_held_type+0xaa/0x120
> ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
> ? dev_load+0x57/0x140
> ? lock_release+0xd4/0x2d0
> dev_ioctl+0x155/0x560
> sock_do_ioctl+0xd7/0x120
> sock_ioctl+0x103/0x360
> ? __fget_files+0xd2/0x170
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8e/0xc0
> do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90
> ? do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x90
> ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xdd/0x180
> ? do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x90
> ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xdd/0x180
> ? do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x90
> ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
> ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x40/0x80
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> RIP: 0033:0x7f2c35d077af
> Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44
> 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <89> c2 3d 00 f0
> ff ff 77 18 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00 RSP:
> 002b:00007ffd7319afd0 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX:
> ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd7319b2c0 RCX: 00007f2c35d077af
> RDX: 00007ffd7319b0f0 RSI: 0000000000008946 RDI: 0000000000000012
> RBP: 00007ffd7319b270 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffd7319b2c8
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
> R13: 00007ffd7319b0f0 R14: 00007ffd7319b0d0 R15: 00007ffd7319b0d0
> </TASK>
>
> Cheers
> James
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-04 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-14 8:14 [Intel-wired-lan] I225-V (igc driver) hangs after resume in igc_resume/igc_tsn_reset James Hogan
2022-07-15 17:25 ` Tony Nguyen
2022-07-17 19:59 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
[not found] ` <4773114.31r3eYUQgx@saruman>
2022-07-23 15:52 ` James Hogan
2022-07-27 14:37 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2022-07-28 17:36 ` James Hogan
2022-08-04 13:03 ` James Hogan [this message]
2022-08-04 13:27 ` Paul Menzel
2022-08-04 21:41 ` James Hogan
2022-08-04 22:07 ` James Hogan
2022-08-05 11:25 ` James Hogan
2022-08-11 15:13 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igc: fix deadlock caused by taking RTNL in RPM resume path Vinicius Costa Gomes
2022-08-11 18:58 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-11 19:59 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-11 20:25 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [WIP v2] " Vinicius Costa Gomes
2022-08-11 21:41 ` James Hogan
2022-08-13 0:05 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2022-08-13 17:18 ` James Hogan
2022-08-29 8:16 ` James Hogan
2022-10-02 10:56 ` James Hogan
2023-08-14 11:04 ` James Hogan
2023-08-29 1:58 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2023-09-03 17:57 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3198206.44csPzL39Z@saruman \
--to=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox