From: zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [E1000-devel] i40e card Tx resets
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:55:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E7CE18.9020004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E7A7B6.5030209@gmail.com>
On 03/15/2016 02:12 PM, zhuyj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the similar problem. Would you like to make tests with pktgen
> tools?
> Maybe the test result is not related with tso.
Sorry. I explain this in details.
I have an similar problem. At first, I think it is related with tso.
Then I made tests with pktgen tools and found that this similar problem
still occurred whether
tso is enabled or not.
So I suggest to make tests with pktgen tools to exclude tso.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
>
> Zhu Yanjun
>
> On 03/15/2016 05:43 AM, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying out some DB stress tests on both i40e and ixgbe. The
>> stress test that I use is rds-stress
>> (http://linux.die.net/man/1/rds-stress),
>> and I can list out the entire set of steps and parameters that I
>> am using to run this if that info is interesting.
>>
>> My test bed is a pair of X5-2 (Haswell) servers, each with a
>> Niantic (X540-AT2) card and a Fortville card. The Niantic/fortville
>> cards are connected back-to-back, so I essentially have a 10G
>> connection and a 40G connection.
>>
>> Everything else (kernel, RDS modules, stress test and parameters)
>> remaining the same, I get the expected throughput on the 10G
>> connection, but the i40e connection goes through a lot of TX
>> errors that result in console messages like this:
>>
>> i40e 0000:81:00.0: TX driver issue detected, PF reset issued
>> i40e 0000:81:00.0 eth2: adding 68:05:ca:30:db:30 vid=0
>> i40e 0000:81:00.0: TX driver issue detected, PF reset issued
>> i40e 0000:81:00.0 eth2: VSI_seid 390, Hung TX queue 32,
>> tx_pending: 82, NTC:0xeb, HWB: 0xeb, NTU: 0x13d, TAIL: 0x13d
>> i40e 0000:81:00.0 eth2: VSI_seid 390, Issuing force_wb for TX
>> queue 32, Interrupt Reg
>>
>> I understand these are "mdd errors", but how can I find out what
>> triggered these errors, any hints?
>>
>> The other data-point here is that if I disable tso, and fall back
>> to gso, there are no tx errors, and throughput matches the 10G
>> connection (for the same set of test parameters).
>>
>> Please let me know if there is any other info that would help.
>> The kernel is a 4.5.0-rc2 kernel. Info for the i40e card is
>>
>> # ethtool -i eth3
>> driver: i40e
>> version: 1.4.8-k
>> firmware-version: 5.02 0x80002285 0.0.0
>> bus-info: 0000:81:00.1
>> :
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> --Sowmini
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Transform Data into Opportunity.
>> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
>> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
>> Click to learn more.
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
>> _______________________________________________
>> E1000-devel mailing list
>> E1000-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
>> To learn more about Intel® Ethernet, visit
>> http://communities.intel.com/community/wired
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-15 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-14 21:43 [Intel-wired-lan] i40e card Tx resets Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-15 6:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [E1000-devel] " zhuyj
2016-03-15 8:55 ` zhuyj [this message]
2016-03-15 10:54 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-16 3:19 ` zhuyj
2016-03-16 3:25 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-16 11:46 ` zhuyj
2016-03-16 14:36 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-17 2:20 ` zhuyj
2016-03-17 2:29 ` zhuyj
2016-03-17 18:56 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-17 19:28 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2016-03-17 19:41 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-18 11:08 ` zhuyj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E7CE18.9020004@gmail.com \
--to=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox