From: zhuyj <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [E1000-devel] i40e card Tx resets
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:46:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E94786.9090701@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160316032523.GC19052@oracle.com>
On 03/16/2016 11:25 AM, Sowmini Varadhan wrote:
> On (03/16/16 11:19), zhuyj wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> Yesterday I made tests with rds-tools. It is very pity that I can
>> not reproduce my problem with rds-tools.
>>
>> But with pktgen tools, I can reproduce this problem easily. And I
>> found that if I set the packet size to 17792 or less than this size,
>> this problem would not occur. But if I set the packet size > 17792,
>> for example 17793, my problem would occur.
> I think it might have to do with number of sockets/cpu/cores and
> the irq balancing issues.
>
>> As such, maybe the packet size triggers my problem. I am not sure
>> that the packet size will trigger your size.
> In my case I did try against netperf request-response (but that is
> single threaded) and iperf (but that is unidirectional, i.e.,
> it is not a bidirectional request-response test)
>
> perhaps if you share the pktgen config (did you change the
> code itself)? some of the i40e experts at intel (who are also
> on the to/cc lists of this mail) can try it out themselves?
>
> I still think that the fundamental problem can be identified
> by looking for what's causing the mdd event.
>
> It must be some type of bug, because ixgbe works fine for me,
> and this seems like a regression on that performance.
>
> --Sowmini
>
It is busy today. Tomorrow I will share the steps about pktgen tools.
Best Regards!
Zhu Yanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-14 21:43 [Intel-wired-lan] i40e card Tx resets Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-15 6:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [E1000-devel] " zhuyj
2016-03-15 8:55 ` zhuyj
2016-03-15 10:54 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-16 3:19 ` zhuyj
2016-03-16 3:25 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-16 11:46 ` zhuyj [this message]
2016-03-16 14:36 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-17 2:20 ` zhuyj
2016-03-17 2:29 ` zhuyj
2016-03-17 18:56 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-17 19:28 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2016-03-17 19:41 ` Sowmini Varadhan
2016-03-18 11:08 ` zhuyj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E94786.9090701@gmail.com \
--to=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox