Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] igbvf: remove unused spinlock

[Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>]

On 9/23/2024 9:46 AM, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 6:04 AM Przemek Kitszel
> <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/21/24 14:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>> Dear Wander,
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your patch.
>>>
>>> Am 20.09.24 um 20:59 schrieb Wander Lairson Costa:
>>>> tx_queue_lock and stats_lock are declared and initialized, but never
>>>> used. Remove them.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> It’d be great if you added a Fixes: tag.
>>
>> Alternatively you could split this series into two, and send this patch
>> to iwl-next tree, without the fixes tag. For me this patch is just
>> a cleanup, not a fix.
>>
>>>
>>
> 
> Should I send a new version of the patches separately?

The patches apply to the respective trees when split out so I can take 
these without a re-send. Patch 1 will need a Fixes: for it though...

I'm seeing it as: 9d5c824399de ("igb: PCI-Express 82575 Gigabit Ethernet 
driver")?

Thanks,
Tony

>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>> With that addressed:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Paul
>>
>