Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] igbvf: remove unused spinlock

[Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>]

On 9/24/2024 4:21 AM, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 3:44 PM Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/23/2024 9:46 AM, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 6:04 AM Przemek Kitszel
>>> <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/21/24 14:52, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>>>> Dear Wander,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 20.09.24 um 20:59 schrieb Wander Lairson Costa:
>>>>>> tx_queue_lock and stats_lock are declared and initialized, but never
>>>>>> used. Remove them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> It’d be great if you added a Fixes: tag.
>>>>
>>>> Alternatively you could split this series into two, and send this patch
>>>> to iwl-next tree, without the fixes tag. For me this patch is just
>>>> a cleanup, not a fix.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Should I send a new version of the patches separately?
>>
>> The patches apply to the respective trees when split out so I can take
>> these without a re-send. Patch 1 will need a Fixes: for it though...
>>
>> I'm seeing it as: 9d5c824399de ("igb: PCI-Express 82575 Gigabit Ethernet
>> driver")?
>>
> 
> Can you add the tag when you apply the patch or should I add it?
> 

I will add the fixes tag when I said it.

Thanks,
Jake