From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 06/12] ice: Add guard rule when creating FDB in switchdev
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 16:22:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab08efd8-3123-7560-0ef0-036dc156db9f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230417093412.12161-7-wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
From: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:34:06 +0200
> From: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@intel.com>
>
> Introduce new "guard" rule upon FDB entry creation.
>
> It matches on src_mac, has valid bit unset, allow_pass_l2 set
> and has a nop action.
[...]
> +static struct ice_rule_query_data *
> +ice_eswitch_br_guard_rule_create(struct ice_hw *hw, u16 vsi_idx,
> + const unsigned char *mac)
> +{
> + struct ice_adv_rule_info rule_info = { 0 };
> + struct ice_rule_query_data *rule;
> + struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *list;
> + const u16 lkups_cnt = 1;
> + int err;
You can initialize it with -%ENOMEM right here in order to...
> +
> + rule = kzalloc(sizeof(*rule), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!rule) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_exit;
> + }
> +
> + list = kcalloc(lkups_cnt, sizeof(*list), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!list) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_list_alloc;
> + }
...make those 2 ifs goto-oneliners :3 As...
> +
> + list[0].type = ICE_MAC_OFOS;
> + ether_addr_copy(list[0].h_u.eth_hdr.src_addr, mac);
> + eth_broadcast_addr(list[0].m_u.eth_hdr.src_addr);
> +
> + rule_info.allow_pass_l2 = true;
> + rule_info.sw_act.vsi_handle = vsi_idx;
> + rule_info.sw_act.fltr_act = ICE_NOP;
> + rule_info.priority = 5;
> +
> + err = ice_add_adv_rule(hw, list, lkups_cnt, &rule_info, rule);
...it's overwritten here anyway, so it is safe to init it with an error
value.
> + if (err)
> + goto err_add_rule;
> +
> + return rule;
> +
> +err_add_rule:
> + kfree(list);
> +err_list_alloc:
> + kfree(rule);
> +err_exit:
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> +}
> +
> static struct ice_esw_br_flow *
> ice_eswitch_br_flow_create(struct device *dev, struct ice_hw *hw, u16 vsi_idx,
> int port_type, const unsigned char *mac)
> {
> - struct ice_rule_query_data *fwd_rule;
> + struct ice_rule_query_data *fwd_rule, *guard_rule;
> struct ice_esw_br_flow *flow;
> int err;
>
> @@ -155,10 +202,22 @@ ice_eswitch_br_flow_create(struct device *dev, struct ice_hw *hw, u16 vsi_idx,
> goto err_fwd_rule;
> }
>
> + guard_rule = ice_eswitch_br_guard_rule_create(hw, vsi_idx, mac);
> + if (IS_ERR(guard_rule)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(guard_rule);
Aaah ok, that's what you meant in the previous mails. I see now.
You can either leave it like that or there's an alternative -- pick the
one that you like the most:
guard_rule = ice_eswitch_...
err = PTR_ERR(guard_rule);
if (err) {
...
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to create eswitch bridge %sgress guard rule, err: %d\n",
> + port_type == ICE_ESWITCH_BR_UPLINK_PORT ? "e" : "in",
> + err);
You still can print it via "%pe" + @guard_rule instead of @err :p (same
with @fwd_rule above)
> + goto err_guard_rule;
> + }
> +
> flow->fwd_rule = fwd_rule;
> + flow->guard_rule = guard_rule;
>
> return flow;
[...]
> @@ -4624,7 +4628,7 @@ static struct ice_protocol_entry ice_prot_id_tbl[ICE_PROTOCOL_LAST] = {
> */
> static u16
> ice_find_recp(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_prot_lkup_ext *lkup_exts,
> - enum ice_sw_tunnel_type tun_type)
> + struct ice_adv_rule_info *rinfo)
Can be const I think?
> {
> bool refresh_required = true;
> struct ice_sw_recipe *recp;
[...]
> @@ -5075,6 +5082,14 @@ ice_add_sw_recipe(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_sw_recipe *rm,
> set_bit(buf[recps].recipe_indx,
> (unsigned long *)buf[recps].recipe_bitmap);
> buf[recps].content.act_ctrl_fwd_priority = rm->priority;
> +
> + if (rm->need_pass_l2)
> + buf[recps].content.act_ctrl |=
> + ICE_AQ_RECIPE_ACT_NEED_PASS_L2;
> +
> + if (rm->allow_pass_l2)
> + buf[recps].content.act_ctrl |=
> + ICE_AQ_RECIPE_ACT_ALLOW_PASS_L2;
I don't like these line breaks :s
type_of_content *cont;
...
/* As far as I can see, it can be used above as well */
cont = &buf[recps].content;
if (rm->need_pass_l2)
cont->act_ctrl |= ICE_AQ_RECIPE_ACT_NEED_PASS_L2;
if (rm->allow_pass_l2)
cont->act_ctrl |= ICE_AQ_RECIPE_ACT_ALLOW_PASS_L2;
> recps++;
> }
>
[...]
> @@ -6166,6 +6190,11 @@ ice_add_adv_rule(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups,
> act |= ICE_SINGLE_ACT_VSI_FORWARDING | ICE_SINGLE_ACT_DROP |
> ICE_SINGLE_ACT_VALID_BIT;
> break;
> + case ICE_NOP:
> + act |= (rinfo->sw_act.fwd_id.hw_vsi_id <<
> + ICE_SINGLE_ACT_VSI_ID_S) & ICE_SINGLE_ACT_VSI_ID_M;
`FIELD_PREP(ICE_SINGLE_ACT_VSI_ID_M, rinfo->sw_act.fwd_id.hw_vsi_id)`?
> + act &= ~ICE_SINGLE_ACT_VALID_BIT;
> + break;
> default:
> status = -EIO;
> goto err_ice_add_adv_rule;
> @@ -6446,7 +6475,7 @@ ice_rem_adv_rule(struct ice_hw *hw, struct ice_adv_lkup_elem *lkups,
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> - rid = ice_find_recp(hw, &lkup_exts, rinfo->tun_type);
> + rid = ice_find_recp(hw, &lkup_exts, rinfo);
> /* If did not find a recipe that match the existing criteria */
> if (rid == ICE_MAX_NUM_RECIPES)
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.h
> index c84b56fe84a5..5ecce39cf1f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.h
> @@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ struct ice_adv_rule_info {
> u16 vlan_type;
> u16 fltr_rule_id;
> u32 priority;
> + u8 need_pass_l2;
> + u8 allow_pass_l2;
They can be either true or false, nothing else, right? I'd make them
occupy 1 bit per var then:
u16 need_pass_l2:1;
u16 allow_pass_l2:1;
u16 src_vsi;
+14 free bits for more flags, no holes (stacked with ::src_vsi).
> u16 src_vsi;
> struct ice_sw_act_ctrl sw_act;
> struct ice_adv_rule_flags_info flags_info;
> @@ -254,6 +256,9 @@ struct ice_sw_recipe {
> */
> u8 priority;
>
> + u8 need_pass_l2;
> + u8 allow_pass_l2;
(same with bitfields here, just use u8 :1 instead of u16 here to stack
with ::priority)
> +
> struct list_head rg_list;
[...]
Thanks,
Olek
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-21 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-17 9:34 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 00/12] ice: switchdev bridge offload Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 01/12] ice: Minor switchdev fixes Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-19 14:35 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 02/12] ice: Remove exclusion code for RDMA+SRIOV Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-19 14:38 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-25 15:26 ` Michal Schmidt
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 03/12] ice: Unset src prune on uplink VSI Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-19 14:49 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 04/12] ice: Implement basic eswitch bridge setup Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-19 15:23 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-20 9:54 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-04-20 10:46 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-04-20 16:53 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-20 16:51 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 05/12] ice: Switchdev FDB events support Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-19 15:38 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-20 11:27 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-04-20 16:59 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-21 8:45 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 06/12] ice: Add guard rule when creating FDB in switchdev Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-21 14:22 ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2023-04-25 9:17 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-04-26 9:50 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-04-26 15:24 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-27 7:24 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 07/12] ice: Accept LAG netdevs in bridge offloads Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-21 14:40 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-26 11:31 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-04-26 15:31 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 08/12] ice: Add VLAN FDB support in switchdev mode Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-21 15:25 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-27 10:28 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-05-08 14:09 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 09/12] ice: implement bridge port vlan Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-21 16:35 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-05-09 11:25 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-05-09 15:06 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 10/12] ice: implement static version of ageing Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-21 16:22 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-05-09 10:55 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-05-09 14:55 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 11/12] ice: add tracepoints for the switchdev bridge Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-17 9:34 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 12/12] ice: Ethtool fdb_cnt stats Wojciech Drewek
2023-04-21 16:32 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-05-09 12:52 ` Drewek, Wojciech
2023-05-09 15:14 ` Alexander Lobakin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ab08efd8-3123-7560-0ef0-036dc156db9f@intel.com \
--to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wojciech.drewek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox