From: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
To: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Cavitt, Jonathan" <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Cc: "Wajdeczko, Michal" <Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com>,
"Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Gupta, Saurabhg" <saurabhg.gupta@intel.com>,
"Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele" <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>,
"Zuo, Alex" <alex.zuo@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Prevent compiler read/write optimization breaks
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 20:59:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a49558774a7158ffa5c111bb237cbc54ce54d8b.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218153527.6436-8-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
On Thu, 2025-12-18 at 15:35 +0000, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> Use READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE when operating on ct->state and the
> g2h_fence->done values to prevent the compiler from ignoring these
> necessary operations.
>
> v2: (Matt Brost)
> - Add Fixes tags
> - Add comments
>
> v3:
> - Split into multiple patches (Rodrigo Vivi)
Is there a reason we aren't combining the like-parameters at least into
a single patch? It doesn't look right splitting the READS and WRITES
into separate ones.
Thanks,
Stuart
>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>
> Jonathan Cavitt (6):
> drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: WRITE_ONCE g2h_fence done in g2h_fence_cancel
> drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: WRITE_ONCE g2h_fence done in parse_g2h_response
> drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: WRITE_ONCE ct state in guc_ct_change_state
> drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: READ_ONCE ct state in xe_guc_ct_initialized
> drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: READ_ONCE ct state in xe_guc_ct_enabled
> drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Justify WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE usage
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 15:35 [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Prevent compiler read/write optimization breaks Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: WRITE_ONCE g2h_fence done in g2h_fence_cancel Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 21:08 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: WRITE_ONCE g2h_fence done in parse_g2h_response Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: WRITE_ONCE ct state in guc_ct_change_state Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: READ_ONCE ct state in xe_guc_ct_initialized Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: READ_ONCE ct state in xe_guc_ct_enabled Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Justify WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE usage Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 21:01 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-12-18 21:03 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-12-18 21:10 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-12-18 21:02 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-12-18 16:18 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Prevent compiler read/write optimization breaks (rev3) Patchwork
2025-12-18 16:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-18 20:59 ` Summers, Stuart [this message]
2025-12-19 13:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a49558774a7158ffa5c111bb237cbc54ce54d8b.camel@intel.com \
--to=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
--cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox