Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, saurabhg.gupta@intel.com,
	alex.zuo@intel.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
	daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
	michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Justify WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE usage
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 13:01:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ipn33oo.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218153527.6436-14-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>

On Thu, 18 Dec 2025 07:35:34 -0800, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
>
> Usage of READ_ONCE and WRITE_ONCE requires comments justifying it.
> Some recently added uses had cross-dependencies with each other, but
> needed to be added separately, so introduce the justifications now when
> it makes more sense to.

What is the reason for doing this in a separate patch? Afais, these
comments should be added in the same patches where the code was changed. So
people can see it in a single patch...

>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 5 +++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index 20ac0438ffb6..24857c2c8cb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -529,6 +529,11 @@ static void guc_ct_change_state(struct xe_guc_ct *ct,
>	if (ct->g2h_outstanding)
>		xe_pm_runtime_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
>	ct->g2h_outstanding = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * WRITE_ONCE pairs with READ_ONCEs in xe_guc_ct_initialized and
> +	 * xe_guc_ct_enabled.
> +	 */
>	WRITE_ONCE(ct->state, state);
>
>	xe_gt_dbg(gt, "GuC CT communication channel %s\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h
> index cb1335f1d66f..8d318b094f33 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h
> @@ -30,11 +30,13 @@ void xe_guc_ct_print(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, struct drm_printer *p, bool want_ctb)
>
>  static inline bool xe_guc_ct_initialized(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
>  {
> +	/* READ_ONCE pairs with WRITE_ONCE in guc_ct_change_state */
>	return READ_ONCE(ct->state) != XE_GUC_CT_STATE_NOT_INITIALIZED;
>  }
>
>  static inline bool xe_guc_ct_enabled(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
>  {
> +	/* READ_ONCE pairs with WRITE_ONCE in guc_ct_change_state */
>	return READ_ONCE(ct->state) == XE_GUC_CT_STATE_ENABLED;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-18 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-18 15:35 [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Prevent compiler read/write optimization breaks Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: WRITE_ONCE g2h_fence done in g2h_fence_cancel Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 21:08   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: WRITE_ONCE g2h_fence done in parse_g2h_response Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: WRITE_ONCE ct state in guc_ct_change_state Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: READ_ONCE ct state in xe_guc_ct_initialized Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: READ_ONCE ct state in xe_guc_ct_enabled Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 15:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Justify WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE usage Jonathan Cavitt
2025-12-18 21:01   ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2025-12-18 21:03     ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2025-12-18 21:10       ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-12-18 21:02   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-12-18 16:18 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Prevent compiler read/write optimization breaks (rev3) Patchwork
2025-12-18 16:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-12-18 20:59 ` [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Prevent compiler read/write optimization breaks Summers, Stuart
2025-12-19 13:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.Full: success for drm/xe/xe_guc_ct: Prevent compiler read/write optimization breaks (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874ipn33oo.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
    --cc=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox