From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 00/12] xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:12:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230612171225.88689-1-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
Main goal is to fix the races in xe_device_mem_access_get(). With that fixed we
can clean up some hacks and also start rolling it out to more places that need
it, including now asserting it around every mmio access. We also add lockdep
annotations for xe_device_mem_access_get() and fix the remaining lockdep
fallout.
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-12 17:12 Matthew Auld [this message]
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 01/12] drm/xe: fix xe_device_mem_access_get() races Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 02/12] drm/xe/vm: tidy up xe_runtime_pm usage Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 03/12] drm/xe/debugfs: grab mem_access around forcewake Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 04/12] drm/xe/mmio: grab mem_access in xe_mmio_ioctl Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:13 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-13 8:30 ` Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 05/12] drm/xe: ensure correct access_put ordering Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 06/12] drm/xe/pci: wrap probe with mem_access Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:34 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 07/12] drm/xe/display: use mem_access underneath Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 08/12] drm/xe/mmio: enforce xe_device_assert_mem_access Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:17 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 09/12] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from guc_ct_send Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 10/12] drm/xe/ggtt: prime ggtt->lock against FS_RECLAIM Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 11/12] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from invalidation_vma Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 12/12] drm/xe: add lockdep annotation for xe_device_mem_access_get() Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:32 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-13 9:42 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-06-13 10:13 ` Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:16 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:17 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:18 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:22 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:22 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:52 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230612171225.88689-1-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox