From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 07/12] drm/xe/display: use mem_access underneath
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:12:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230612171225.88689-8-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230612171225.88689-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
There are places in the display code (i915) doing mmio access.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
---
| 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
index 59bf1d4a61d6..7a43f3af1796 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ static inline bool intel_runtime_pm_get(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm)
xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
return false;
}
+ xe_device_mem_access_get(xe);
return true;
}
@@ -158,14 +159,14 @@ static inline bool intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm)
{
struct xe_device *xe = container_of(pm, struct xe_device, runtime_pm);
- return xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(xe);
+ return xe_device_mem_access_get_if_ongoing(xe);
}
static inline void intel_runtime_pm_put_unchecked(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm)
{
struct xe_device *xe = container_of(pm, struct xe_device, runtime_pm);
- xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
+ xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
}
static inline void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct xe_runtime_pm *pm, bool wakeref)
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-12 17:12 [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 00/12] xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 01/12] drm/xe: fix xe_device_mem_access_get() races Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 02/12] drm/xe/vm: tidy up xe_runtime_pm usage Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 03/12] drm/xe/debugfs: grab mem_access around forcewake Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 04/12] drm/xe/mmio: grab mem_access in xe_mmio_ioctl Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:13 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-13 8:30 ` Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 05/12] drm/xe: ensure correct access_put ordering Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:16 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 06/12] drm/xe/pci: wrap probe with mem_access Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:34 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 17:12 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 08/12] drm/xe/mmio: enforce xe_device_assert_mem_access Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:17 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 09/12] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from guc_ct_send Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 10/12] drm/xe/ggtt: prime ggtt->lock against FS_RECLAIM Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 11/12] drm/xe: drop xe_device_mem_access_get() from invalidation_vma Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:22 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-12 17:12 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v11 12/12] drm/xe: add lockdep annotation for xe_device_mem_access_get() Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 18:32 ` Matthew Brost
2023-06-13 9:42 ` Thomas Hellström
2023-06-13 10:13 ` Matthew Auld
2023-06-12 17:16 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for xe_device_mem_access fixes and related bits Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:17 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:18 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:22 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:22 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:23 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-06-12 17:52 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230612171225.88689-8-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox