Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, suraj.kandpal@intel.com,
	jani.nikula@linux.intel.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/dp: Drop max_requested_bpc for dsc pipe_min/max bpp
Date: Thu,  3 Oct 2024 16:13:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003104343.984060-5-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003104343.984060-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Currently we are including both max_requested_bpc and
limits->pipe.bpp_max while computing maximum possible pipe bpp with dsc.
However, while setting limits->pipe.max_bpp, the max_requested_bpc is
already taken into account.

Drop the redundant check for max_requested_bpc and use only
limits->pipe.bpp_max. This will also result in dropping conn_state
argument in functions where it was used only to get max_requested_bpc.

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index b553b24604e1..46f3b680afe9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -2167,14 +2167,13 @@ int intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(struct intel_display *display)
 
 static
 bool is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
-				struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
 				struct link_config_limits *limits,
 				int pipe_bpp)
 {
 	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(&i915->drm);
 	int dsc_max_bpc, dsc_min_bpc, dsc_max_pipe_bpp, dsc_min_pipe_bpp;
 
-	dsc_max_bpc = min(intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc(display), conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
+	dsc_max_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc(display);
 	dsc_min_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(display);
 
 	dsc_max_pipe_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpc * 3, limits->pipe.max_bpp);
@@ -2186,7 +2185,6 @@ bool is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
 
 static
 int intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
-				struct drm_connector_state *conn_state,
 				struct link_config_limits *limits)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
@@ -2197,7 +2195,7 @@ int intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 
 	forced_bpp = intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc * 3;
 
-	if (is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, conn_state, limits, forced_bpp)) {
+	if (is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, limits, forced_bpp)) {
 		drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Input DSC BPC forced to %d\n", intel_dp->force_dsc_bpc);
 		return forced_bpp;
 	}
@@ -2217,14 +2215,13 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
 	const struct intel_connector *connector =
 		to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
-	int max_req_bpc = conn_state->max_requested_bpc;
 	int dsc_max_bpc, dsc_max_bpp;
 	int dsc_min_bpc, dsc_min_bpp;
 	u8 dsc_bpc[3] = {};
 	int forced_bpp, pipe_bpp;
 	int num_bpc, i, ret;
 
-	forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state, limits);
+	forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp, limits);
 
 	if (forced_bpp) {
 		ret = dsc_compute_compressed_bpp(intel_dp, connector, pipe_config,
@@ -2239,7 +2236,6 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	if (!dsc_max_bpc)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	dsc_max_bpc = min(dsc_max_bpc, max_req_bpc);
 	dsc_max_bpp = min(dsc_max_bpc * 3, limits->pipe.max_bpp);
 
 	dsc_min_bpc = intel_dp_dsc_min_src_input_bpc(display);
@@ -2279,16 +2275,16 @@ static int intel_edp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 	int dsc_src_min_bpp, dsc_sink_min_bpp, dsc_min_bpp;
 	int dsc_src_max_bpp, dsc_sink_max_bpp, dsc_max_bpp;
 
-	forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp, conn_state, limits);
+	forced_bpp = intel_dp_force_dsc_pipe_bpp(intel_dp, limits);
 
 	if (forced_bpp) {
 		pipe_bpp = forced_bpp;
 	} else {
-		int max_bpc = min(limits->pipe.max_bpp / 3, (int)conn_state->max_requested_bpc);
+		int max_bpc = limits->pipe.max_bpp / 3;
 
 		/* For eDP use max bpp that can be supported with DSC. */
 		pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, max_bpc);
-		if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, conn_state, limits, pipe_bpp)) {
+		if (!is_dsc_pipe_bpp_sufficient(i915, limits, pipe_bpp)) {
 			drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
 				    "Computed BPC is not in DSC BPC limits\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-03 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-03 10:43 [PATCH 0/7] DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-03 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/dp: Use HAS_DSC macro in intel_dp_dsc_max_src_input_bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-03 11:04   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-17 12:13   ` Imre Deak
2024-11-15  8:10     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-10-03 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915/dp: Return int from dsc_max/min_src_input_bpc helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-03 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use helpers to get dsc min/max input bpc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-03 10:43 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2024-10-13 15:35   ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/dp: Drop max_requested_bpc for dsc pipe_min/max bpp Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-03 10:43 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915/dp: Refactor pipe_bpp limits with dsc Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-13 15:37   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-17 12:20   ` Imre Deak
2024-11-15  8:13     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-11-15  8:25       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-10-03 10:43 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/dp: Use clamp for pipe_bpp limits with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-13 15:39   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-03 10:43 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/dp: Set the DSC link limits intel_dp_compute_config_link_bpp_limits Ankit Nautiyal
2024-10-13 15:46   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-15  6:15   ` Kandpal, Suraj
2024-10-17 12:42   ` Imre Deak
2024-11-15  8:28     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-10-03 10:49 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for DP DSC min/max src bpc fixes Patchwork
2024-10-03 10:49 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 10:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 11:03 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 11:05 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-10-03 11:07 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-10-03 11:31 ` ✓ CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-03 12:30 ` ✗ CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241003104343.984060-5-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox