From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 18:35:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250303173522.1822-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (raw)
It was noticed that on VF we skip applying LRC WAs since we don't
process any RTP rules in xe_rtp_process_to_sr() and also because
during preparation of the WA job driver may read some registers
to perform RMW operation. By converting WA job to use MI_MATH we
can run this job also on VF. Inspired by i915 series [1].
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67276/
Michal Wajdeczko (5):
drm/xe: Add MI_LOAD_REGISTER_REG command definition
drm/xe: Add MI_MATH and ALU instruction definitions
drm/xe: Avoid reading RMW registers in emit_wa_job
drm/xe/vf: Stop applying save-restore MMIOs if VF
drm/xe/vf: Unblock xe_rtp_process_to_sr for VFs
.../gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_alu_commands.h | 72 ++++++++++++++++
.../gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_mi_commands.h | 5 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h | 4 +
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 84 ++++++++++++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_reg_sr.c | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c | 3 -
6 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_alu_commands.h
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 17:35 Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe: Add MI_LOAD_REGISTER_REG command definition Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 21:18 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe: Add MI_MATH and ALU instruction definitions Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 21:50 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-04 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 " Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe: Avoid reading RMW registers in emit_wa_job Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 18:06 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-03 18:47 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-04 16:50 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-03 22:06 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe/vf: Stop applying save-restore MMIOs if VF Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 18:09 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-03 22:16 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-03 22:16 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/vf: Unblock xe_rtp_process_to_sr for VFs Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 22:17 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-11 10:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 17:44 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC Patchwork
2025-03-03 17:44 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-03 17:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-03 18:02 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 18:05 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 18:06 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 18:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 20:12 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:27 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:27 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:28 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:45 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:47 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:48 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-05 5:43 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-07 16:34 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-07 18:12 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC (rev3) Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:13 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:14 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:36 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:39 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:41 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 19:03 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-08 20:46 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-10 16:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-11 12:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC (rev4) Patchwork
2025-03-11 12:55 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-11 12:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-11 13:13 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-11 13:15 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-11 13:17 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-11 13:37 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-12 5:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-12 10:34 ` Michal Wajdeczko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250303173522.1822-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox