From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC (rev4)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:34:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f14e37b-7b41-4fea-b77a-e3145741a1a3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <174175806554.22571.17757010164278269717@18a75f3d1eae>
On 12.03.2025 06:41, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC (rev4)
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/145732/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-2794-777e1850811f9864aa8b55940634d3da19712bf7_full -> xe-pw-145732v4_full
> ====================================================
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-145732v4_full absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in xe-pw-145732v4_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (4 -> 4)
> ------------------------------
>
> No changes in participating hosts
>
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-145732v4_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> #### Possible regressions ####
>
> * igt@kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing@pipe-a-hdmi-a-6-dp-4:
> - shard-dg2-set2: [PASS][1] -> [ABORT][2] +1 other test abort
> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2794-777e1850811f9864aa8b55940634d3da19712bf7/shard-dg2-433/igt@kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing@pipe-a-hdmi-a-6-dp-4.html
> [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-145732v4/shard-dg2-463/igt@kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing@pipe-a-hdmi-a-6-dp-4.html
unrelated, not seen on previous runs of this series
<4> [212.095268] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4> [212.095281] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] vblank wait timed out on crtc 0
<4> [212.095319] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 4915 at
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c:1307 drm_wait_one_vblank+0x1ef/0x210
>
> * igt@kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing@pipe-b-hdmi-a-6-dp-4:
> - shard-dg2-set2: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-WARN][4]
> [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2794-777e1850811f9864aa8b55940634d3da19712bf7/shard-dg2-433/igt@kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing@pipe-b-hdmi-a-6-dp-4.html
> [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-145732v4/shard-dg2-463/igt@kms_setmode@invalid-clone-single-crtc-stealing@pipe-b-hdmi-a-6-dp-4.html
unrelated, not seen on previous runs of this series
<4> [213.151269] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4> [213.151283] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] vblank wait timed out on crtc 1
<4> [213.151321] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 4915 at
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c:1307 drm_wait_one_vblank+0x1ef/0x210
>
> * igt@xe_oa@buffer-size:
> - shard-bmg: [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6]
> [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-2794-777e1850811f9864aa8b55940634d3da19712bf7/shard-bmg-2/igt@xe_oa@buffer-size.html
> [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-145732v4/shard-bmg-7/igt@xe_oa@buffer-size.html
according to the section below, this test should be "Suppressed"
Starting subtest: buffer-size
Starting dynamic subtest: rcs-0-128K
(xe_oa:3603) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function
test_non_zero_reason, file ../tests/intel/xe_oa.c:2509:
(xe_oa:3603) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: !(oa_status &
DRM_XE_OASTATUS_BUFFER_OVERFLOW)
Dynamic subtest rcs-0-128K failed.
>
>
> #### Suppressed ####
>
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
>
> * {igt@xe_oa@buffer-size@rcs-0-128k}:
> - shard-bmg: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][7]
> [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-145732v4/shard-bmg-7/igt@xe_oa@buffer-size@rcs-0-128k.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 17:35 [PATCH 0/5] Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe: Add MI_LOAD_REGISTER_REG command definition Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 21:18 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe: Add MI_MATH and ALU instruction definitions Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 21:50 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-04 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 " Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe: Avoid reading RMW registers in emit_wa_job Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 18:06 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-03 18:47 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-04 16:50 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-03 22:06 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe/vf: Stop applying save-restore MMIOs if VF Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 18:09 ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-03 22:16 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-03 22:16 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-03 17:35 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/vf: Unblock xe_rtp_process_to_sr for VFs Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 22:17 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-11 10:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-03 17:44 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC Patchwork
2025-03-03 17:44 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-03 17:46 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-03 18:02 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 18:05 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 18:06 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 18:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-03 20:12 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:27 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC (rev2) Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:27 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:28 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:45 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:47 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-04 17:48 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-05 5:43 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-07 16:34 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-07 18:12 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC (rev3) Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:13 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:14 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:36 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:39 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 18:41 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-07 19:03 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-08 20:46 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-10 16:31 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-03-11 12:55 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Use MI_MATH to apply RMW WA in LRC (rev4) Patchwork
2025-03-11 12:55 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-11 12:56 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-03-11 13:13 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-03-11 13:15 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-03-11 13:17 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-03-11 13:37 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-03-12 5:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-12 10:34 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f14e37b-7b41-4fea-b77a-e3145741a1a3@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox