From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, uma.shankar@intel.com,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com,
Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Add helper to compute link M/N ratio for reuse
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:45:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250721091529.3864004-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721091529.3864004-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Introduce `intel_display_get_link_m_n()` to compute the link M/N ratio
based on pixel clock and link clock. This logic was previously embedded
within `intel_link_compute_m_n()`.
The new helper allows reuse of link M/N computation in other contexts
without requiring the full data M/N calculation.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 456fc4b04cda..671491a2a3b6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -2506,13 +2506,24 @@ static void compute_m_n(u32 *ret_m, u32 *ret_n,
intel_reduce_m_n_ratio(ret_m, ret_n);
}
+static
+void intel_display_get_link_m_n(u32 *link_m, u32 *link_n,
+ u32 pixel_clock,
+ u32 link_clock)
+{
+ u32 link_symbol_clock = intel_dp_link_symbol_clock(link_clock);
+
+ compute_m_n(link_m, link_n,
+ pixel_clock, link_symbol_clock,
+ 0x80000);
+}
+
void
intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bits_per_pixel_x16, int nlanes,
int pixel_clock, int link_clock,
int bw_overhead,
struct intel_link_m_n *m_n)
{
- u32 link_symbol_clock = intel_dp_link_symbol_clock(link_clock);
u32 data_m = intel_dp_effective_data_rate(pixel_clock, bits_per_pixel_x16,
bw_overhead);
u32 data_n = drm_dp_max_dprx_data_rate(link_clock, nlanes);
@@ -2529,9 +2540,8 @@ intel_link_compute_m_n(u16 bits_per_pixel_x16, int nlanes,
data_m, data_n,
0x8000000);
- compute_m_n(&m_n->link_m, &m_n->link_n,
- pixel_clock, link_symbol_clock,
- 0x80000);
+ intel_display_get_link_m_n(&m_n->link_m, &m_n->link_n,
+ pixel_clock, link_clock);
}
void intel_panel_sanitize_ssc(struct intel_display *display)
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-21 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 9:15 [PATCH 0/4] Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21 9:15 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2025-07-21 9:15 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/dp: Limit m/n ratio to 10 for DP SST Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21 11:41 ` Imre Deak
2025-07-22 5:55 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-07-22 9:22 ` Imre Deak
2025-07-22 15:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-07-21 9:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dp_mst: Limit m/n ratio to 10 for MST Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21 9:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dp: Add M/N ratio check with warning for DP link config Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21 9:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/display: Add bits for link_n_exended for DISPLAY >= 14 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-29 11:08 ` Jani Nikula
2025-07-21 9:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/display_wa: Add support for Wa_14021768792 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-29 11:10 ` Jani Nikula
2025-07-21 9:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/display: Add bits for Wa_14021768792 for linkm/n ratio > 10 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21 9:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14021768792 for BMG DP for link_m/n " Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21 9:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dp: Extend intel_dp_can_support_m_n() for BMG M/N bypass Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21 9:34 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit (rev5) Patchwork
2025-07-21 9:35 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-07-21 9:50 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-07-21 17:27 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-07-21 18:17 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250721091529.3864004-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox