Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, uma.shankar@intel.com,
	ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com,
	Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/dp: Limit m/n ratio to 10 for DP SST
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:45:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250721091529.3864004-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721091529.3864004-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

The hardware cannot support DisplayPort configurations where the
ceiling of the Link M/Link N ratio exceeds 10. This limitation has
always existed, but it typically wasn't encountered without the use of
joiners and DSC.

With higher resolutions and combinations involving joiners and DSC,
this constraint can now be hit in certain scenarios.

Introduce a check during link rate configuration to ensure
the computed M/N ratio does not exceed the hardware limit. If no valid
link rate satisfies this constraint, the mode will be rejected.

Note: This change applies the check only for SST. Support for MST will
be added in a subsequent commit.

v2:
-Move the M/N ratio check to the link rate configuration phase instead
of during M/N computation. (Ville)
-Prune modes that cannot be supported even with highest link rate due to
M/N ratio restriction.

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  3 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c      | 33 +++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 671491a2a3b6..f32a4956c926 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -2506,7 +2506,6 @@ static void compute_m_n(u32 *ret_m, u32 *ret_n,
 	intel_reduce_m_n_ratio(ret_m, ret_n);
 }
 
-static
 void intel_display_get_link_m_n(u32 *link_m, u32 *link_n,
 				u32 pixel_clock,
 				u32 link_clock)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
index 37e2ab301a80..bfa3db219b9c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
@@ -559,5 +559,8 @@ bool assert_port_valid(struct intel_display *display, enum port port);
 
 bool intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa(struct intel_display *display);
 int intel_crtc_num_joined_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
+void intel_display_get_link_m_n(u32 *link_m, u32 *link_n,
+				u32 pixel_clock,
+				u32 link_clock);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index 54d88f24b689..4245dd65b2af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -1407,6 +1407,28 @@ bool intel_dp_has_dsc(const struct intel_connector *connector)
 	return true;
 }
 
+static int
+intel_dp_get_max_m_n_ratio(void)
+{
+	return 10;
+}
+
+static bool
+intel_dp_can_support_m_n(int pixel_clock,
+			 int link_rate)
+{
+	int max_m_n_ratio = intel_dp_get_max_m_n_ratio();
+	u32 link_m, link_n;
+	int m_n_ratio;
+
+	intel_display_get_link_m_n(&link_m, &link_n,
+				   pixel_clock, link_rate);
+
+	m_n_ratio = DIV_ROUND_UP(link_m, link_n);
+
+	return m_n_ratio <= max_m_n_ratio;
+}
+
 static enum drm_mode_status
 intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 		    const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
@@ -1518,6 +1540,9 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 	if (status != MODE_OK)
 		return status;
 
+	if (!intel_dp_can_support_m_n(target_clock, max_rate))
+		return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
+
 	return intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(display, mode, num_joined_pipes);
 }
 
@@ -1789,6 +1814,9 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 			    link_rate > limits->max_rate)
 				continue;
 
+			if (!intel_dp_can_support_m_n(clock, link_rate))
+				continue;
+
 			for (lane_count = limits->min_lane_count;
 			     lane_count <= limits->max_lane_count;
 			     lane_count <<= 1) {
@@ -1796,7 +1824,6 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_config_wide(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 									 link_rate,
 									 lane_count);
 
-
 				if (mode_rate <= link_avail) {
 					pipe_config->lane_count = lane_count;
 					pipe_config->pipe_bpp = bpp;
@@ -1983,6 +2010,10 @@ static int dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
 		if (link_rate < limits->min_rate || link_rate > limits->max_rate)
 			continue;
 
+		if (!intel_dp_can_support_m_n(adjusted_mode->clock,
+					      link_rate))
+			continue;
+
 		for (lane_count = limits->min_lane_count;
 		     lane_count <= limits->max_lane_count;
 		     lane_count <<= 1) {
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-21  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-21  9:15 [PATCH 0/4] Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21  9:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Add helper to compute link M/N ratio for reuse Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21  9:15 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2025-07-21 11:41   ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/dp: Limit m/n ratio to 10 for DP SST Imre Deak
2025-07-22  5:55     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-07-22  9:22       ` Imre Deak
2025-07-22 15:15         ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-07-21  9:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915/dp_mst: Limit m/n ratio to 10 for MST Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21  9:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/dp: Add M/N ratio check with warning for DP link config Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21  9:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915/display: Add bits for link_n_exended for DISPLAY >= 14 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-29 11:08   ` Jani Nikula
2025-07-21  9:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/display_wa: Add support for Wa_14021768792 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-29 11:10   ` Jani Nikula
2025-07-21  9:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/display: Add bits for Wa_14021768792 for linkm/n ratio > 10 Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21  9:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/display: Implement Wa_14021768792 for BMG DP for link_m/n " Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21  9:15 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/dp: Extend intel_dp_can_support_m_n() for BMG M/N bypass Ankit Nautiyal
2025-07-21  9:34 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Implement Wa_14021768792 to bypass m_n ratio limit (rev5) Patchwork
2025-07-21  9:35 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-07-21  9:50 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-07-21 17:27 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-07-21 18:17 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250721091529.3864004-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox