From: Nareshkumar Gollakoti <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: michal.wajdeczko@intel.com,
Nareshkumar Gollakoti <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] drm/xe:Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 22:48:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251128171759.2775650-4-naresh.kumar.g@intel.com> (raw)
Due to SLA agreement between PF and VFs,the alternate CCS-mode
cannot be changed when VFs are already enabled.
Similarly, enabling VFs is not permitted when the alternate
CCS-mode is active. Also skipping populating
CCS-mode sysfs entry in VF Mode.
---
v2:
- function xe_device_is_vf_enabled has been refactored to
xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled and moved to xe_sriov_pf_helper.h.
- The code now distinctly checks for SR-IOV VF mode and
SR-IOV PF with VFs enabled.
- Log messages have been updated to explicitly state the current mode.
- The function xe_multi_ccs_mode_enabled is moved to xe_device.h
v3: Described missed arg documentation for xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled
v4:
- sysfs interface for CCS mode is not initialized
when operating in SRIOV VF Mode.
- xe_sriov_pf_has_vfs_enabled() check is sufficient while CCS mode
enablement.
- remove unnecessary comments as flow is self explanatory.
v5:(review comments from Michal)
- Add xe device level CCS mode block with mutex lock and CCS mode state
- necessesary functions to manage ccs mode state to provide strict mutual
exclusive support b/w CCS mode & SRIOV VF enabling
v6:
- Re modeled implementation based on lockdown the PF using custom guard
supported functions by Michal
v7:
- Corrected patch style as message written as subject
- Used public PF lockdown functions instead internal funcions(Michal)
- Creating CCS Mode entries only on PF Mode
v8:(Michal)
- updated short subject and few comments
- used guard for mutex
- Add a check of PF Mode to ensure use of xe_sriov_pf_lockdown only in
PF Mode
- Added default CCS mode check to xe_gt_ccs_mode_default(gt) function
v9:(Michal)
- Added xe_gt_ccs_mode_default(gt) as static inline and it can be used
across driver to use between default or alternate CCS mode
- removed comment from obvious code
Nareshkumar Gollakoti (2):
drm/xe: Fix Prevent VFs from exposing the CCS mode sysfs file
drm/xe: Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h | 12 ++++++
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-28 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-28 17:18 Nareshkumar Gollakoti [this message]
2025-11-28 17:18 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/xe: Fix Prevent VFs from exposing the CCS mode sysfs file Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-11-28 17:18 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/xe: Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-12-03 8:52 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-12-03 12:13 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-03 12:43 ` Kumar G, Naresh
2025-11-28 17:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe:Mutual " Patchwork
2025-11-28 18:46 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-28 19:54 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-12-15 5:49 ` Kumar G, Naresh
2026-01-29 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-01-29 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Fix Prevent VFs from exposing the CCS mode sysfs file Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-01-29 21:13 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-01-30 14:32 ` Kumar G, Naresh
2026-01-30 15:16 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-02-06 14:37 ` Kumar G, Naresh
2026-01-29 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-01-29 21:41 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-01-30 14:33 ` Kumar G, Naresh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-28 12:38 [V9 PATCH] " Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-11-28 17:16 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] drm/xe:Mutual " Nareshkumar Gollakoti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251128171759.2775650-4-naresh.kumar.g@intel.com \
--to=naresh.kumar.g@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox