Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kumar G, Naresh" <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 20:03:29 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ea74d05-6766-461e-8a0f-45e3618e2c10@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bf19afa-44ab-458b-9cb7-178cfb8d0373@intel.com>

Hi Michal,

please find inlined comments.

On 30-01-2026 03:11, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/29/2026 6:22 PM, Nareshkumar Gollakoti wrote:
>> Due to SLA agreement between PF and VFs,the alternate CCS-mode
>                                            ^
> nit: missing space

Noted

> 
>> cannot be changed when VFs are already enabled.
>> Similarly, enabling VFs is not permitted when the alternate
>> CCS-mode is active.
> 
> maybe it's worth to mention:
> 
> "Currently we block CCS mode changes if driver is running as PF,
>   even if there are no VFs enabled yet."
> 
> above says "why" but what about "how" ? maybe:
> 
> "Use lockdown mechanism provided by the PF to relax that limitation
>   and still enforce above VFs related requirements."
>

Make sense, Noted.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nareshkumar Gollakoti <naresh.kumar.g@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h | 12 ++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
>> index e146e00b0ca2..52285a550f34 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>>   #include "xe_gt_sysfs.h"
>>   #include "xe_mmio.h"
>>   #include "xe_sriov.h"
>> +#include "xe_sriov_pf.h"
>>   
>>   static void __xe_gt_apply_ccs_mode(struct xe_gt *gt, u32 num_engines)
>>   {
>> @@ -117,12 +118,6 @@ ccs_mode_store(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>   	u32 num_engines, num_slices;
>>   	int ret;
>>   
>> -	if (IS_SRIOV(xe)) {
>> -		xe_gt_dbg(gt, "Can't change compute mode when running as %s\n",
>> -			  xe_sriov_mode_to_string(xe_device_sriov_mode(xe)));
>> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -	}
>> -
>>   	ret = kstrtou32(buff, 0, &num_engines);
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		return ret;
>> @@ -139,21 +134,35 @@ ccs_mode_store(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	/* CCS mode can only be updated when there are no drm clients */
>> -	mutex_lock(&xe->drm.filelist_mutex);
>> +	guard(mutex)(&xe->drm.filelist_mutex);
>>   	if (!list_empty(&xe->drm.filelist)) {
>> -		mutex_unlock(&xe->drm.filelist_mutex);
>>   		xe_gt_dbg(gt, "Rejecting compute mode change as there are active drm clients\n");
>>   		return -EBUSY;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	if (gt->ccs_mode != num_engines) {
>> -		xe_gt_info(gt, "Setting compute mode to %d\n", num_engines);
>> -		gt->ccs_mode = num_engines;
>> -		xe_gt_record_user_engines(gt);
>> -		xe_gt_reset(gt);
>> +	if (gt->ccs_mode == num_engines)
>> +		return count;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Changing default CCS mode is only allowed when there
>> +	 * are no VFs. Try to lockdown PF to find out.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (xe_gt_ccs_mode_default(gt) && IS_SRIOV_PF(xe)) {
>> +		ret = xe_sriov_pf_lockdown(xe);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			xe_gt_dbg(gt, "Can't change CCS Mode: VFs are enabled\n");
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	mutex_unlock(&xe->drm.filelist_mutex);
>> +	xe_gt_info(gt, "Setting compute mode to %d\n", num_engines);
>> +	gt->ccs_mode = num_engines;
>> +	xe_gt_record_user_engines(gt);
>> +	xe_gt_reset(gt);
>> +
>> +	/* We may end PF lockdown once CCS mode is default again */
>> +	if (xe_gt_ccs_mode_default(gt) && IS_SRIOV_PF(xe))
>> +		xe_sriov_pf_end_lockdown(xe);
>>   
>>   	return count;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h
>> index f8779852cf0d..53a595b0882c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_ccs_mode.h
>> @@ -20,5 +20,17 @@ static inline bool xe_gt_ccs_mode_enabled(const struct xe_gt *gt)
>>   	return hweight32(CCS_MASK(gt)) > 1;
>>   }
>>   
>> +/**
>> + * xe_gt_ccs_mode_default() - Check if CCS mode is default (single CCS mode)
>> + * @gt: GT structure
>> + *
>> + * Return: %true if actual CCS mode is single mode, or
>> + *         %false otherwise (CCS in alternate/multi mode)
>> + */
>> +static inline bool xe_gt_ccs_mode_default(struct xe_gt *gt)
>> +{
>> +	return gt->ccs_mode == 1;
>> +}
> 
> nit: do we need this as public helper ?

Currently this function not needed as public.
will move to .c file as a simple static function.

> 
> maybe it should be defined as simple static function in .c ?
>

Agreed.

Thanks,
Naresh

>> +
>>   #endif
>>   
> 
> but the code change LGTM, so with commit msg improved,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-30 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-28 17:18 [PATCH v1 0/2] drm/xe:Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-11-28 17:18 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] drm/xe: Fix Prevent VFs from exposing the CCS mode sysfs file Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-11-28 17:18 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/xe: Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2025-12-03  8:52   ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-12-03 12:13     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-12-03 12:43     ` Kumar G, Naresh
2025-11-28 17:31 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe:Mutual " Patchwork
2025-11-28 18:46 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-11-28 19:54 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-12-15  5:49   ` Kumar G, Naresh
2026-01-29 17:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-01-29 17:22   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe: Fix Prevent VFs from exposing the CCS mode sysfs file Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-01-29 21:13     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-01-30 14:32       ` Kumar G, Naresh
2026-01-30 15:16         ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-02-06 14:37           ` Kumar G, Naresh
2026-01-29 17:22   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Mutual exclusivity between CCS-mode and PF Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-01-29 21:41     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-01-30 14:33       ` Kumar G, Naresh [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-30  9:44 [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/xe:Mutual " Nareshkumar Gollakoti
2026-01-30  9:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/xe: Mutual " Nareshkumar Gollakoti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ea74d05-6766-461e-8a0f-45e3618e2c10@intel.com \
    --to=naresh.kumar.g@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox