From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/dp: Factor out intel_dp_link_bw_overhead()
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 21:23:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251215192357.172201-7-imre.deak@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251215192357.172201-1-imre.deak@intel.com>
Factor out intel_dp_link_bw_overhead(), used later for BW calculation
during DP SST mode validation and state computation.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 22 +++++------------
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index a1170dc5ad9ab..a9f0485dbe646 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -424,6 +424,32 @@ static int intel_dp_min_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
return 1;
}
+int intel_dp_link_bw_overhead(int link_clock, int lane_count, int hdisplay,
+ int dsc_slice_count, int bpp_x16, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ int overhead;
+
+ WARN_ON(flags & ~(DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_MST | DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_SSC_REF_CLK |
+ DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC));
+
+ if (drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(link_clock))
+ flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_UHBR;
+
+ if (dsc_slice_count)
+ flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_DSC;
+
+ overhead = drm_dp_bw_overhead(lane_count, hdisplay,
+ dsc_slice_count,
+ bpp_x16,
+ flags);
+
+ /*
+ * TODO: clarify whether a minimum required by the fixed FEC overhead
+ * in the bspec audio programming sequence is required here.
+ */
+ return max(overhead, intel_dp_bw_fec_overhead(flags & DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC));
+}
+
/*
* The required data bandwidth for a mode with given pixel clock and bpp. This
* is the required net bandwidth independent of the data bandwidth efficiency.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
index 97e361458f760..d7f9410129f49 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
@@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ void intel_dp_compute_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int port_clock,
bool intel_dp_source_supports_tps3(struct intel_display *display);
bool intel_dp_source_supports_tps4(struct intel_display *display);
+int intel_dp_link_bw_overhead(int link_clock, int lane_count, int hdisplay,
+ int dsc_slice_count, int bpp_x16, unsigned long flags);
int intel_dp_link_required(int pixel_clock, int bpp);
int intel_dp_effective_data_rate(int pixel_clock, int bpp_x16,
int bw_overhead);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
index 1a4784f0cd6bd..c1058b4a85d02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
@@ -180,26 +180,16 @@ static int intel_dp_mst_bw_overhead(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
&crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
unsigned long flags = DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_MST;
- int overhead;
- flags |= intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state) ? DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_UHBR : 0;
flags |= ssc ? DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_SSC_REF_CLK : 0;
flags |= crtc_state->fec_enable ? DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC : 0;
- if (dsc_slice_count)
- flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_DSC;
-
- overhead = drm_dp_bw_overhead(crtc_state->lane_count,
- adjusted_mode->hdisplay,
- dsc_slice_count,
- bpp_x16,
- flags);
-
- /*
- * TODO: clarify whether a minimum required by the fixed FEC overhead
- * in the bspec audio programming sequence is required here.
- */
- return max(overhead, intel_dp_bw_fec_overhead(crtc_state->fec_enable));
+ return intel_dp_link_bw_overhead(crtc_state->port_clock,
+ crtc_state->lane_count,
+ adjusted_mode->hdisplay,
+ dsc_slice_count,
+ bpp_x16,
+ flags);
}
static void intel_dp_mst_compute_m_n(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
--
2.49.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-15 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 19:23 [PATCH 00/16] drm/i915/dp: Clean up link BW/DSC slice config computation (fixes) Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/dp: Parse all DSC slice count caps for eDP 1.5 Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/dp: Add drm_dp_dsc_sink_slice_count_mask() Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/dp: Fix DSC sink's slice count capability check Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/dp: Return a fixed point BPP value from intel_dp_output_bpp() Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/dp: Use a mode's crtc_clock vs. clock during state computation Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/dp: Fix BW check in is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config() Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/dp: Use the effective data rate for DP BW calculation Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/dp: Use the effective data rate for DP compressed " Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp: Account with MST, SSC BW overhead for uncompressed DP-MST stream BW Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/dp: Account with DSC BW overhead for compressed DP-SST " Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Account with pipe joiner max compressed BPP limit for DP-MST and eDP Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Fail state computation for invalid min/max link BPP values Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/dp: Fail state computation for invalid max throughput BPP value Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/dp: Fail state computation for invalid max sink compressed " Imre Deak
2025-12-15 19:23 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/dp: Fail state computation for invalid DSC source input BPP values Imre Deak
2025-12-15 22:16 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/dp: Clean up link BW/DSC slice config computation (fixes) Patchwork
2025-12-15 22:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-12-15 22:36 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-12-15 23:31 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-12-16 9:27 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-12-16 17:30 ` [PATCH 00/16] " Imre Deak
2025-12-18 12:00 ` Imre Deak
2025-12-19 13:28 ` Maarten Lankhorst
[not found] ` <176585164976.91286.8511052780566467299@a3b018990fe9>
2025-12-19 15:21 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success for " Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251215192357.172201-7-imre.deak@intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox