Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: jani.nikula@linux.intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com,
	Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid()
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:48:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260130081812.32087-14-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260130081812.32087-1-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

Make dsc_slice_count closer to the block where it is used and promote it
from u8 to int. This aligns it with upcoming DSC bubble pixel-rate
adjustments, where the slice count participates in wider arithmetic.

Currently, for non-eDP (DP/DP_MST) cases  the slice count is computed only
inside intel_dp_dsc_mode_valid() and is not used by the caller. Once DSC
bubble handling is added, dp_mode_valid() will need access to its own local
slice count for non-eDP cases as well.

Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
index bf90605ec9cb..61b86cdff3ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
@@ -1436,7 +1436,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 	int target_clock = mode->clock;
 	int max_rate, mode_rate, max_lanes, max_link_clock;
 	u16 dsc_max_compressed_bpp = 0;
-	u8 dsc_slice_count = 0;
 	enum drm_mode_status status;
 	bool dsc = false;
 	int num_joined_pipes;
@@ -1486,6 +1485,8 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 	 */
 	status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
 	for (num_joined_pipes = 1; num_joined_pipes <= I915_MAX_PIPES; num_joined_pipes++) {
+		int dsc_slice_count = 0;
+
 		if (connector->force_joined_pipes &&
 		    num_joined_pipes != connector->force_joined_pipes)
 			continue;
@@ -1503,6 +1504,11 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 		if (intel_dp_has_dsc(connector)) {
 			int pipe_bpp;
 
+			dsc_slice_count = intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(connector,
+								       target_clock,
+								       mode->hdisplay,
+								       num_joined_pipes);
+
 			/*
 			 * TBD pass the connector BPC,
 			 * for now U8_MAX so that max BPC on that platform would be picked
@@ -1517,12 +1523,6 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
 				dsc_max_compressed_bpp =
 					drm_edp_dsc_sink_output_bpp(connector->dp.dsc_dpcd) >> 4;
 
-				dsc_slice_count =
-					intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(connector,
-								     target_clock,
-								     mode->hdisplay,
-								     num_joined_pipes);
-
 				dsc = dsc_max_compressed_bpp && dsc_slice_count;
 			} else if (drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(connector->dp.fec_capability)) {
 				unsigned long bw_overhead_flags = 0;
-- 
2.45.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-30  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-30  8:17 [PATCH 00/17] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:17 ` [PATCH 01/17] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:17 ` [PATCH 02/17] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:17 ` [PATCH 03/17] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:17 ` [PATCH 04/17] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02  8:40   ` Imre Deak
2026-02-02  9:24     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-02-02  9:27       ` Imre Deak
2026-02-02  9:29         ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 05/17] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 06/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 07/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 08/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02  8:50   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 09/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 10/17] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 11/17] drm/i915/dp: Remove unused joiner helpers Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 12/17] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` Ankit Nautiyal [this message]
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 14/17] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 15/17] drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for joiner candidate loops Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02  8:51   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 16/17] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:18 ` [PATCH 17/17] drm/i915/display: Extend the max dotclock limit to WCL Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-30  8:41 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev6) Patchwork
2026-01-30  8:42 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-01-30  8:58 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-01-30  9:15 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-01-30 11:10   ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-02-02 10:37 [PATCH 00/17] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-02-02 10:37 ` [PATCH 13/17] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260130081812.32087-14-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox