public inbox for intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/de: Move intel_de_wait*() into intel_de.c
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 13:10:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260313111028.25159-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313111028.25159-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

intel_de_wait*() end up doing quite a bit of stuff, so the one
function call overhead from them seems insignificant. Move the
implementation intel_de.c.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h | 99 +++++--------------------
 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c
index 5348c1d51eb8..fce92535bd6a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.c
@@ -7,6 +7,78 @@
 
 #include "intel_de.h"
 
+int intel_de_wait_us(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+		     u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_us,
+		     u32 *out_value)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	intel_dmc_wl_get(display, reg);
+
+	ret = __intel_wait_for_register(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
+					value, timeout_us, 0, out_value);
+
+	intel_dmc_wl_put(display, reg);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int intel_de_wait_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+		     u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_ms,
+		     u32 *out_value)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	intel_dmc_wl_get(display, reg);
+
+	ret = __intel_wait_for_register(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
+					value, 2, timeout_ms, out_value);
+
+	intel_dmc_wl_put(display, reg);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int intel_de_wait_fw_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_ms,
+			u32 *out_value)
+{
+	return __intel_wait_for_register_fw(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
+					    value, 2, timeout_ms, out_value);
+}
+
+int intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			       u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_us,
+			       u32 *out_value)
+{
+	return __intel_wait_for_register_fw(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
+					    value, timeout_us, 0, out_value);
+}
+
+int intel_de_wait_for_set_us(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			     u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_us)
+{
+	return intel_de_wait_us(display, reg, mask, mask, timeout_us, NULL);
+}
+
+int intel_de_wait_for_clear_us(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			       u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_us)
+{
+	return intel_de_wait_us(display, reg, mask, 0, timeout_us, NULL);
+}
+
+int intel_de_wait_for_set_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			     u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_ms)
+{
+	return intel_de_wait_ms(display, reg, mask, mask, timeout_ms, NULL);
+}
+
+int intel_de_wait_for_clear_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			       u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_ms)
+{
+	return intel_de_wait_ms(display, reg, mask, 0, timeout_ms, NULL);
+}
+
 u8 intel_de_read8(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg)
 {
 	/* this is only used on VGA registers (possible on pre-g4x) */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
index 8ca5904ba84e..f87b84ab9d6d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_de.h
@@ -86,85 +86,26 @@ intel_de_rmw(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg, u32 clear, u32 set)
 	return val;
 }
 
-static inline int
-intel_de_wait_us(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
-		 u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_us,
-		 u32 *out_value)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	intel_dmc_wl_get(display, reg);
-
-	ret = __intel_wait_for_register(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
-					value, timeout_us, 0, out_value);
-
-	intel_dmc_wl_put(display, reg);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static inline int
-intel_de_wait_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
-		 u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_ms,
-		 u32 *out_value)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-	intel_dmc_wl_get(display, reg);
-
-	ret = __intel_wait_for_register(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
-					value, 2, timeout_ms, out_value);
-
-	intel_dmc_wl_put(display, reg);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static inline int
-intel_de_wait_fw_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
-		    u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_ms,
-		    u32 *out_value)
-{
-	return __intel_wait_for_register_fw(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
-					    value, 2, timeout_ms, out_value);
-}
-
-static inline int
-intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
-			   u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_us,
-			   u32 *out_value)
-{
-	return __intel_wait_for_register_fw(__to_uncore(display), reg, mask,
-					    value, timeout_us, 0, out_value);
-}
-
-static inline int
-intel_de_wait_for_set_us(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
-			 u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_us)
-{
-	return intel_de_wait_us(display, reg, mask, mask, timeout_us, NULL);
-}
-
-static inline int
-intel_de_wait_for_clear_us(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
-			   u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_us)
-{
-	return intel_de_wait_us(display, reg, mask, 0, timeout_us, NULL);
-}
-
-static inline int
-intel_de_wait_for_set_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
-			 u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_ms)
-{
-	return intel_de_wait_ms(display, reg, mask, mask, timeout_ms, NULL);
-}
-
-static inline int
-intel_de_wait_for_clear_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
-			   u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_ms)
-{
-	return intel_de_wait_ms(display, reg, mask, 0, timeout_ms, NULL);
-}
+int intel_de_wait_us(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+		     u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_us,
+		     u32 *out_value);
+int intel_de_wait_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+		     u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_ms,
+		     u32 *out_value);
+int intel_de_wait_fw_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_ms,
+			u32 *out_value);
+int intel_de_wait_fw_us_atomic(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			       u32 mask, u32 value, unsigned int timeout_us,
+			       u32 *out_value);
+int intel_de_wait_for_set_us(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			     u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_us);
+int intel_de_wait_for_clear_us(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			       u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_us);
+int intel_de_wait_for_set_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			     u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_ms);
+int intel_de_wait_for_clear_ms(struct intel_display *display, i915_reg_t reg,
+			       u32 mask, unsigned int timeout_ms);
 
 /*
  * Unlocked mmio-accessors, think carefully before using these.
-- 
2.52.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-13 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-13 11:10 [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/de: Move register polling into display code Ville Syrjala
2026-03-13 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/de: Introduce intel_de.c and move intel_de_{read, write}8() there Ville Syrjala
2026-03-13 14:21   ` Jani Nikula
2026-03-13 11:10 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2026-03-13 14:21   ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/de: Move intel_de_wait*() into intel_de.c Jani Nikula
2026-03-13 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/de: Implement register polling in the display code Ville Syrjala
2026-03-13 15:03   ` Jani Nikula
2026-03-17  7:52     ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-03-23  9:50     ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-03-14  8:09   ` kernel test robot
2026-03-23  9:43   ` [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2026-03-13 11:15 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/de: Move register polling into " Patchwork
2026-03-13 11:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-13 11:51 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-14 14:29 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-23 10:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/i915/de: Move register polling into display code (rev2) Patchwork
2026-03-23 10:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-03-23 11:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-23 13:56 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260313111028.25159-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox