From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/xe: Fix name and definition of GFX_MODE register
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:48:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260424-engine-setup-v2-5-59cc620a25f1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260424-engine-setup-v2-0-59cc620a25f1@intel.com>
The register located at $base+0x29c is referred to as GFX_MODE in the
bspec. Although many other registers have RING_* prefixes for
historical reasons, this register does not, so using a name that does
not match the bspec just makes it harder to recognize/find.
Also, GFX_MODE is a masked register (updating bits [15:0] requires that
the corresponding bit(s) in [31:16] are also set), so add the
XE_REG_OPTION_MASKED flag to the register definition; this will become
important when we start programming this register via RTP tables in a
future patch.
Finally swap the order of the register's two bit definitions to match
our regular coding style of descending order for register bits/fields.
Bspec: 45928
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h
index 1b4a7e9a703d..4d5cd1b6f50d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_engine_regs.h
@@ -165,9 +165,9 @@
#define CTX_CTRL_INHIBIT_SYN_CTX_SWITCH REG_BIT(3)
#define CTX_CTRL_ENGINE_CTX_RESTORE_INHIBIT REG_BIT(0)
-#define RING_MODE(base) XE_REG((base) + 0x29c)
-#define GFX_DISABLE_LEGACY_MODE REG_BIT(3)
+#define GFX_MODE(base) XE_REG((base) + 0x29c, XE_REG_OPTION_MASKED)
#define GFX_MSIX_INTERRUPT_ENABLE REG_BIT(13)
+#define GFX_DISABLE_LEGACY_MODE REG_BIT(3)
#define RING_CSMQDEBUG(base) XE_REG((base) + 0x2b0)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
index 026a1ec0c868..337b9b4e8b4a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_execlist.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void __start_lrc(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe, struct xe_lrc *lrc,
if (xe_device_has_msix(gt_to_xe(hwe->gt)))
ring_mode |= REG_MASKED_FIELD_ENABLE(GFX_MSIX_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
- xe_mmio_write32(mmio, RING_MODE(hwe->mmio_base), ring_mode);
+ xe_mmio_write32(mmio, GFX_MODE(hwe->mmio_base), ring_mode);
xe_mmio_write32(mmio, RING_EXECLIST_SQ_CONTENTS_LO(hwe->mmio_base),
lower_32_bits(lrc_desc));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
index d0497d9f43a2..b403ee0b5e74 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ads.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static unsigned int guc_mmio_regset_write(struct xe_guc_ads *ads,
struct xe_reg reg;
bool skip;
} *e, extra_regs[] = {
- { .reg = RING_MODE(hwe->mmio_base), },
+ { .reg = GFX_MODE(hwe->mmio_base), },
{ .reg = RING_HWS_PGA(hwe->mmio_base), },
{ .reg = RING_IMR(hwe->mmio_base), },
{ .reg = CCS_MODE,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
index 2f5816c78fba..bc49e40165a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_capture.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct __guc_capture_parsed_output {
{ RING_TAIL(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, 0, "RING_TAIL"}, \
{ RING_CTL(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, 0, "RING_CTL"}, \
{ RING_MI_MODE(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, 0, "RING_MI_MODE"}, \
- { RING_MODE(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, 0, "RING_MODE"}, \
+ { GFX_MODE(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, 0, "GFX_MODE"}, \
{ RING_ESR(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, 0, "RING_ESR"}, \
{ RING_EMR(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, 0, "RING_EMR"}, \
{ RING_EIR(0), REG_32BIT, 0, 0, 0, "RING_EIR"}, \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
index ec47e17b4119..60af395d031c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_engine.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ void xe_hw_engine_enable_ring(struct xe_hw_engine *hwe)
if (xe_device_has_msix(gt_to_xe(hwe->gt)))
ring_mode |= REG_MASKED_FIELD_ENABLE(GFX_MSIX_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
- xe_hw_engine_mmio_write32(hwe, RING_MODE(0), ring_mode);
+ xe_hw_engine_mmio_write32(hwe, GFX_MODE(0), ring_mode);
xe_hw_engine_mmio_write32(hwe, RING_MI_MODE(0),
REG_MASKED_FIELD_DISABLE(STOP_RING));
xe_hw_engine_mmio_read32(hwe, RING_MI_MODE(0));
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 20:48 [PATCH v2 00/10] Engine initialization cleanup Matt Roper
2026-04-24 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/xe: Move CCS enablement to engine setup RTP Matt Roper
2026-04-24 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] drm/xe/rtp: Add "always true" match function Matt Roper
2026-04-24 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] drm/xe: Stop programming BLIT_CCTL on Xe2 and later platforms Matt Roper
2026-04-24 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] drm/xe: Move HWSTAM programming to RTP Matt Roper
2026-04-24 20:48 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2026-04-24 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/xe: Const-ify parameters to xe_device_has_* functions Matt Roper
2026-04-24 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/xe: Move GFX_MODE programming to RTP Matt Roper
2026-04-24 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] drm/xe: Drop unnecessary STOP_RING clearing Matt Roper
2026-04-24 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] drm/xe: Drop xe_hw_engine_mmio_write32() Matt Roper
2026-04-24 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] drm/xe: Mark BCS engines as belonging to the GT forcewake domain Matt Roper
2026-04-24 21:27 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Engine initialization cleanup (rev2) Patchwork
2026-04-24 22:30 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-24 23:15 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260424-engine-setup-v2-5-59cc620a25f1@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox