From: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, uma.shankar@intel.com,
ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 8/9] drm/i915/vrr: Program CMRR enable/disable from transcoder timings
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:09:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722043923.3241977-9-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722043923.3241977-1-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Split the CMRR M/N register programming into intel_vrr_enable_cmrr()
and intel_vrr_disable_cmrr(), and drive them from
intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings() based on crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable.
VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE is not set explicitly, writing TRANS_CMRR_N_HI
arms CMRR in hardware. Drop the now-unused cmrr_enable
argument to intel_vrr_tg_enable().
No functional change intended for non-CMRR configurations.
--v2:
- Commit message changes.
- Added Simplified enable/disable sequence. (Chaitanya)
--v3:
- Guard CMRR enable condition (Chaitanya)
- Comment changes updated (Chaitanya)
- Squash register write commits together and
avoid double writing issue. (Chaitanya)
--v4:
- Guard CMRR enable/disable with platform check
Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
index e8c6516fd36a..6bc3ccd62513 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
@@ -195,6 +195,40 @@ static bool intel_vrr_cmrr_possible(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
return (HAS_CMRR(display) && intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display));
}
+static void
+intel_vrr_enable_cmrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+ struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
+ enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
+
+ if (!intel_vrr_cmrr_possible(crtc_state))
+ return;
+
+ intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
+ upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
+ intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
+ lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
+ intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
+ lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
+ intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
+ upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
+}
+
+static void
+intel_vrr_disable_cmrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+ struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
+ enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
+
+ if (!intel_vrr_cmrr_possible(crtc_state))
+ return;
+
+ intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_HI(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
+ intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_LO(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
+ intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_LO(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
+ intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_HI(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
+}
+
static void
intel_vrr_cmrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
@@ -351,6 +385,11 @@ void intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
if (!intel_vrr_possible(crtc_state))
return;
+ if (crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable)
+ intel_vrr_enable_cmrr(crtc_state);
+ else
+ intel_vrr_disable_cmrr(crtc_state);
+
intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMIN(display, transcoder),
intel_vrr_fixed_rr_hw_vmin(crtc_state) - 1);
intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMAX(display, transcoder),
@@ -662,17 +701,6 @@ void intel_vrr_set_transcoder_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
return;
}
- if (crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable) {
- intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
- upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
- intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
- lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
- intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
- upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
- intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
- lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
- }
-
intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings(crtc_state, cpu_transcoder);
intel_cmtg_set_vrr_timings(crtc_state);
@@ -938,8 +966,7 @@ intel_vrr_disable_dc_balancing(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_CTL(display, cpu_transcoder), vrr_ctl);
}
-static void intel_vrr_tg_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- bool cmrr_enable)
+static void intel_vrr_tg_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
{
struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
@@ -951,11 +978,12 @@ static void intel_vrr_tg_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
vrr_ctl = VRR_CTL_VRR_ENABLE | trans_vrr_ctl(crtc_state);
/*
- * FIXME this might be broken as bspec seems to imply that
- * even VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE is armed by TRANS_CMRR_N_HI
- * when enabling CMRR (but not when disabling CMRR?).
+ * This full TRANS_VRR_CTL write is the authoritative one, so it must
+ * carry VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE when CMRR is in use. Writing TRANS_CMRR_N_HI
+ * arms the bit in hardware, but this later write would otherwise clear
+ * it again.
*/
- if (cmrr_enable)
+ if (crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable)
vrr_ctl |= VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE;
intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_CTL(display, cpu_transcoder), vrr_ctl);
@@ -991,7 +1019,7 @@ void intel_vrr_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
intel_vrr_enable_dc_balancing(crtc_state);
if (!intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display))
- intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state, crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable);
+ intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state);
}
void intel_vrr_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
@@ -1018,7 +1046,7 @@ void intel_vrr_transcoder_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
return;
if (intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display))
- intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state, false);
+ intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state);
}
void intel_vrr_transcoder_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 4:39 [PATCH v6 0/9] Enable CMRR in fixed-RR VRR path Mitul Golani
2026-07-22 4:39 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] drm/i915/vrr: Return from PSR2 compute config in case of CMRR enabled Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:15 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-24 10:22 ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
2026-07-24 10:33 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22 4:39 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] drm/i915/vrr: Restrict CMRR enable condition to VRR-TG-default platforms Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:16 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22 4:39 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] drm/i915/vrr: Add per-CRTC vrr/cmrr debugfs control Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:16 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22 4:39 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] drm/i915/vrr: Update AS_SDP target_rr_divider based on CMRR config request Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:17 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22 4:39 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] drm/i915/display: Move CMRR crtc_state members under VRR Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:18 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22 4:39 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] drm/i915/vrr: Compute CMRR fractional timings generically Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:19 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22 4:39 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] drm/i915/vrr: Dump CMRR state in the crtc state dump Mitul Golani
2026-07-22 4:39 ` Mitul Golani [this message]
2026-07-23 16:21 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] drm/i915/vrr: Program CMRR enable/disable from transcoder timings Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-28 5:46 ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
2026-07-22 4:39 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] drm/i915/vrr: Enable cmrr Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:21 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-24 9:50 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-28 11:14 ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
2026-07-22 4:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Enable CMRR in fixed-RR VRR path (rev5) Patchwork
2026-07-22 5:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-22 19:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260722043923.3241977-9-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
--to=mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox