Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, uma.shankar@intel.com,
	ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 8/9] drm/i915/vrr: Program CMRR enable/disable from transcoder timings
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 10:09:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722043923.3241977-9-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722043923.3241977-1-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>

Split the CMRR M/N register programming into intel_vrr_enable_cmrr()
and intel_vrr_disable_cmrr(), and drive them from
intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings() based on crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable.

VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE is not set explicitly, writing TRANS_CMRR_N_HI
arms CMRR in hardware. Drop the now-unused cmrr_enable
argument to intel_vrr_tg_enable().

No functional change intended for non-CMRR configurations.

--v2:
- Commit message changes.
- Added Simplified enable/disable sequence. (Chaitanya)

--v3:
- Guard CMRR enable condition (Chaitanya)
- Comment changes updated (Chaitanya)
- Squash register write commits together and
avoid double writing issue. (Chaitanya)

--v4:
- Guard CMRR enable/disable with platform check

Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
index e8c6516fd36a..6bc3ccd62513 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
@@ -195,6 +195,40 @@ static bool intel_vrr_cmrr_possible(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 	return (HAS_CMRR(display) && intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display));
 }
 
+static void
+intel_vrr_enable_cmrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
+	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
+
+	if (!intel_vrr_cmrr_possible(crtc_state))
+		return;
+
+	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
+		       upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
+	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
+		       lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
+	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
+		       lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
+	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
+		       upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
+}
+
+static void
+intel_vrr_disable_cmrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
+	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
+
+	if (!intel_vrr_cmrr_possible(crtc_state))
+		return;
+
+	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_HI(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
+	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_LO(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
+	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_LO(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
+	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_HI(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
+}
+
 static void
 intel_vrr_cmrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 {
@@ -351,6 +385,11 @@ void intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 	if (!intel_vrr_possible(crtc_state))
 		return;
 
+	if (crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable)
+		intel_vrr_enable_cmrr(crtc_state);
+	else
+		intel_vrr_disable_cmrr(crtc_state);
+
 	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMIN(display, transcoder),
 		       intel_vrr_fixed_rr_hw_vmin(crtc_state) - 1);
 	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMAX(display, transcoder),
@@ -662,17 +701,6 @@ void intel_vrr_set_transcoder_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	if (crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable) {
-		intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
-			       upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
-		intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
-			       lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
-		intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
-			       upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
-		intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
-			       lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
-	}
-
 	intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings(crtc_state, cpu_transcoder);
 	intel_cmtg_set_vrr_timings(crtc_state);
 
@@ -938,8 +966,7 @@ intel_vrr_disable_dc_balancing(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
 	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_CTL(display, cpu_transcoder), vrr_ctl);
 }
 
-static void intel_vrr_tg_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
-				bool cmrr_enable)
+static void intel_vrr_tg_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 {
 	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
 	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
@@ -951,11 +978,12 @@ static void intel_vrr_tg_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 	vrr_ctl = VRR_CTL_VRR_ENABLE | trans_vrr_ctl(crtc_state);
 
 	/*
-	 * FIXME this might be broken as bspec seems to imply that
-	 * even VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE is armed by TRANS_CMRR_N_HI
-	 * when enabling CMRR (but not when disabling CMRR?).
+	 * This full TRANS_VRR_CTL write is the authoritative one, so it must
+	 * carry VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE when CMRR is in use. Writing TRANS_CMRR_N_HI
+	 * arms the bit in hardware, but this later write would otherwise clear
+	 * it again.
 	 */
-	if (cmrr_enable)
+	if (crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable)
 		vrr_ctl |= VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE;
 
 	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_CTL(display, cpu_transcoder), vrr_ctl);
@@ -991,7 +1019,7 @@ void intel_vrr_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 	intel_vrr_enable_dc_balancing(crtc_state);
 
 	if (!intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display))
-		intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state, crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable);
+		intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state);
 }
 
 void intel_vrr_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
@@ -1018,7 +1046,7 @@ void intel_vrr_transcoder_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
 		return;
 
 	if (intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display))
-		intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state, false);
+		intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state);
 }
 
 void intel_vrr_transcoder_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
-- 
2.48.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22  4:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-22  4:39 [PATCH v6 0/9] Enable CMRR in fixed-RR VRR path Mitul Golani
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] drm/i915/vrr: Return from PSR2 compute config in case of CMRR enabled Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:15   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-24 10:22     ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
2026-07-24 10:33       ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] drm/i915/vrr: Restrict CMRR enable condition to VRR-TG-default platforms Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:16   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] drm/i915/vrr: Add per-CRTC vrr/cmrr debugfs control Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:16   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] drm/i915/vrr: Update AS_SDP target_rr_divider based on CMRR config request Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:17   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] drm/i915/display: Move CMRR crtc_state members under VRR Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:18   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] drm/i915/vrr: Compute CMRR fractional timings generically Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:19   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] drm/i915/vrr: Dump CMRR state in the crtc state dump Mitul Golani
2026-07-22  4:39 ` Mitul Golani [this message]
2026-07-23 16:21   ` [PATCH v6 8/9] drm/i915/vrr: Program CMRR enable/disable from transcoder timings Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-28  5:46     ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] drm/i915/vrr: Enable cmrr Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:21   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-24  9:50     ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-28 11:14       ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
2026-07-22  4:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Enable CMRR in fixed-RR VRR path (rev5) Patchwork
2026-07-22  5:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-22 19:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260722043923.3241977-9-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
    --to=mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox