Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
To: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <uma.shankar@intel.com>,
	<ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/9] drm/i915/vrr: Program CMRR enable/disable from transcoder timings
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 21:51:23 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61f53f61-5fb0-4e84-9869-ef614463b8ec@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722043923.3241977-9-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>



On 7/22/2026 10:09 AM, Mitul Golani wrote:
> Split the CMRR M/N register programming into intel_vrr_enable_cmrr()
> and intel_vrr_disable_cmrr(), and drive them from
> intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings() based on crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable.
> 
> VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE is not set explicitly, writing TRANS_CMRR_N_HI
> arms CMRR in hardware. Drop the now-unused cmrr_enable
> argument to intel_vrr_tg_enable().
> 
> No functional change intended for non-CMRR configurations.
> 
> --v2:
> - Commit message changes.
> - Added Simplified enable/disable sequence. (Chaitanya)
> 
> --v3:
> - Guard CMRR enable condition (Chaitanya)
> - Comment changes updated (Chaitanya)
> - Squash register write commits together and
> avoid double writing issue. (Chaitanya)
> 
> --v4:
> - Guard CMRR enable/disable with platform check
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++-------
>   1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> index e8c6516fd36a..6bc3ccd62513 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vrr.c
> @@ -195,6 +195,40 @@ static bool intel_vrr_cmrr_possible(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>   	return (HAS_CMRR(display) && intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display));
>   }
>   
> +static void
> +intel_vrr_enable_cmrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> +

This will result in CMTG instances of the registers remain unwritten. 
Transcoder should be passed as an argument, similar to 
intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings()

> +	if (!intel_vrr_cmrr_possible(crtc_state))
> +		return;
> +
> +	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
> +		       upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
> +	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
> +		       lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
> +	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
> +		       lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
> +	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
> +		       upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +intel_vrr_disable_cmrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> +	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
> +	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> +
> +	if (!intel_vrr_cmrr_possible(crtc_state))
> +		return;
> +
> +	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_HI(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
> +	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_LO(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
> +	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_LO(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
> +	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_HI(display, cpu_transcoder), 0);
> +}
> +
>   static void
>   intel_vrr_cmrr_compute_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>   {
> @@ -351,6 +385,11 @@ void intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>   	if (!intel_vrr_possible(crtc_state))
>   		return;
>   
> +	if (crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable)
> +		intel_vrr_enable_cmrr(crtc_state);
> +	else
> +		intel_vrr_disable_cmrr(crtc_state);
> +

Is there a specific reason for having the enable/disable mechanics? 
Can't we just make it part of a function similar to 
intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings() and let it program the registers with 
whatever value the compute config comes up with? some relevant values 
for enable and 0 for disable.

>   	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMIN(display, transcoder),
>   		       intel_vrr_fixed_rr_hw_vmin(crtc_state) - 1);
>   	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_VMAX(display, transcoder),
> @@ -662,17 +701,6 @@ void intel_vrr_set_transcoder_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable) {
> -		intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
> -			       upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
> -		intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_M_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
> -			       lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_m));
> -		intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_HI(display, cpu_transcoder),
> -			       upper_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
> -		intel_de_write(display, TRANS_CMRR_N_LO(display, cpu_transcoder),
> -			       lower_32_bits(crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.cmrr_n));
> -	}
> -
>   	intel_vrr_set_fixed_rr_timings(crtc_state, cpu_transcoder);
>   	intel_cmtg_set_vrr_timings(crtc_state);
>   
> @@ -938,8 +966,7 @@ intel_vrr_disable_dc_balancing(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
>   	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_CTL(display, cpu_transcoder), vrr_ctl);
>   }
>   
> -static void intel_vrr_tg_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> -				bool cmrr_enable)
> +static void intel_vrr_tg_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>   {
>   	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state);
>   	enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> @@ -951,11 +978,12 @@ static void intel_vrr_tg_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>   	vrr_ctl = VRR_CTL_VRR_ENABLE | trans_vrr_ctl(crtc_state);
>   
>   	/*
> -	 * FIXME this might be broken as bspec seems to imply that
> -	 * even VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE is armed by TRANS_CMRR_N_HI
> -	 * when enabling CMRR (but not when disabling CMRR?).
> +	 * This full TRANS_VRR_CTL write is the authoritative one, so it must
> +	 * carry VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE when CMRR is in use. Writing TRANS_CMRR_N_HI
> +	 * arms the bit in hardware, but this later write would otherwise clear
> +	 * it again.
>   	 */
> -	if (cmrr_enable)
> +	if (crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable)
>   		vrr_ctl |= VRR_CTL_CMRR_ENABLE;
>

Will this path ever reach through a fastset?

Another thing related to the modeset/fastset semantics. In cmmr_compute 
config we might end up with votal different from the mode line. If we 
need something similar to LRR where vtotal change can be achieved 
through a fastset is worth checking.
>   	intel_de_write(display, TRANS_VRR_CTL(display, cpu_transcoder), vrr_ctl);
> @@ -991,7 +1019,7 @@ void intel_vrr_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>   	intel_vrr_enable_dc_balancing(crtc_state);
>   
>   	if (!intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display))
> -		intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state, crtc_state->vrr.cmrr.enable);
> +		intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state);
>   }
>   
>   void intel_vrr_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> @@ -1018,7 +1046,7 @@ void intel_vrr_transcoder_enable(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>   		return;
>   
>   	if (intel_vrr_always_use_vrr_tg(display))
> -		intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state, false);
> +		intel_vrr_tg_enable(crtc_state);
>   }
>   
>   void intel_vrr_transcoder_disable(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-23 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-22  4:39 [PATCH v6 0/9] Enable CMRR in fixed-RR VRR path Mitul Golani
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] drm/i915/vrr: Return from PSR2 compute config in case of CMRR enabled Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:15   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-24 10:22     ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
2026-07-24 10:33       ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] drm/i915/vrr: Restrict CMRR enable condition to VRR-TG-default platforms Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:16   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] drm/i915/vrr: Add per-CRTC vrr/cmrr debugfs control Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:16   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] drm/i915/vrr: Update AS_SDP target_rr_divider based on CMRR config request Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:17   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] drm/i915/display: Move CMRR crtc_state members under VRR Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:18   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] drm/i915/vrr: Compute CMRR fractional timings generically Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:19   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] drm/i915/vrr: Dump CMRR state in the crtc state dump Mitul Golani
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] drm/i915/vrr: Program CMRR enable/disable from transcoder timings Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:21   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar [this message]
2026-07-28  5:46     ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
2026-07-22  4:39 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] drm/i915/vrr: Enable cmrr Mitul Golani
2026-07-23 16:21   ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-24  9:50     ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-07-28 11:14       ` Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar
2026-07-22  4:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Enable CMRR in fixed-RR VRR path (rev5) Patchwork
2026-07-22  5:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-22 19:41 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61f53f61-5fb0-4e84-9869-ef614463b8ec@intel.com \
    --to=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox