Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Unify pcode related debugs
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:40:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826134033.13976-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826134033.13976-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

The debug spew for the cdclk pcode per/post notify is very
inconsistent between different platforms. Unify it all to
the same form.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 65 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index 53d6cb05e467..ba1684a99886 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
 	ret = intel_parent_pcode_write(display, BDW_PCODE_DISPLAY_FREQ_CHANGE_REQ, 0x0);
 	if (ret) {
 		drm_err(display->drm,
-			"failed to inform pcode about cdclk change\n");
+			"Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -918,8 +918,11 @@ static void bdw_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
 	if (ret)
 		drm_err(display->drm, "Switching back to LCPLL failed\n");
 
-	intel_parent_pcode_write(display, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
-				 cdclk_config->voltage_level);
+	ret = intel_parent_pcode_write(display, HSW_PCODE_DE_WRITE_FREQ_REQ,
+				       cdclk_config->voltage_level);
+	if (ret)
+		drm_err(display->drm,
+			"Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
 
 	intel_de_write(display, CDCLK_FREQ,
 		       DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk, 1000) - 1);
@@ -1181,7 +1184,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
 					 SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
 	if (ret) {
 		drm_err(display->drm,
-			"Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (%d)\n", ret);
+			"Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1221,8 +1224,11 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
 	intel_de_posting_read(display, CDCLK_CTL);
 
 	/* inform PCU of the change */
-	intel_parent_pcode_write(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
-				 cdclk_config->voltage_level);
+	ret = intel_parent_pcode_write(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
+				       cdclk_config->voltage_level);
+	if (ret)
+		drm_err(display->drm,
+			"Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
 
 	intel_update_cdclk(display);
 }
@@ -2290,8 +2296,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
 
 	if (ret) {
 		drm_err(display->drm,
-			"Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err %d, freq %d)\n",
-			ret, cdclk);
+			"Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -2326,8 +2331,7 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
 						       cdclk_config->voltage_level, 2);
 	if (ret)
 		drm_err(display->drm,
-			"PCode CDCLK freq set failed, (err %d, freq %d)\n",
-			ret, cdclk);
+			"Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
 
 	intel_update_cdclk(display);
 
@@ -2620,14 +2624,13 @@ void intel_cdclk_dump_config(struct intel_display *display,
 		    cdclk_config->voltage_level);
 }
 
-static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(struct intel_display *display,
-				   u8 voltage_level,
-				   u8 active_pipe_count,
-				   u16 cdclk,
-				   bool cdclk_update_valid,
-				   bool pipe_count_update_valid)
+static int dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(struct intel_display *display,
+				  u8 voltage_level,
+				  u8 active_pipe_count,
+				  u16 cdclk,
+				  bool cdclk_update_valid,
+				  bool pipe_count_update_valid)
 {
-	int ret;
 	u32 update_mask = 0;
 
 	update_mask = DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_UPDATE_MASK(cdclk, active_pipe_count, voltage_level);
@@ -2638,14 +2641,10 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(struct intel_display *display,
 	if (pipe_count_update_valid)
 		update_mask |= DISPLAY_TO_PCODE_PIPE_COUNT_VALID;
 
-	ret = intel_parent_pcode_request(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
-					 update_mask,
-					 SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
-					 SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
-	if (ret)
-		drm_err(display->drm,
-			"Failed to inform PCU about display config (err %d)\n",
-			ret);
+	return intel_parent_pcode_request(display, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
+					  update_mask,
+					  SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE,
+					  SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3);
 }
 
 static void intel_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
@@ -2724,6 +2723,7 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_pre_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	u8 voltage_level, num_active_pipes = 0;
 	bool change_cdclk, update_pipe_count;
 	unsigned int cdclk_mhz = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!intel_cdclk_changed(&old_cdclk_state->actual,
 				 &new_cdclk_state->actual) &&
@@ -2760,8 +2760,11 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_pre_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	if (update_pipe_count)
 		num_active_pipes = dg2_power_well_count(display, new_cdclk_state);
 
-	dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk_mhz,
-			       change_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
+	ret = dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk_mhz,
+				     change_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
+	if (ret)
+		drm_err(display->drm,
+			"Failed to inform PCODE about start of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
 }
 
 static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
@@ -2774,6 +2777,7 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	u8 voltage_level, num_active_pipes = 0;
 	bool update_cdclk, update_pipe_count;
 	unsigned int cdclk_mhz = 0;
+	int ret;
 
 	/* According to "Sequence After Frequency Change", set voltage to used level */
 	voltage_level = new_cdclk_state->actual.voltage_level;
@@ -2801,8 +2805,11 @@ static void dg2_cdclk_pcode_post_notify(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 	if (update_pipe_count)
 		num_active_pipes = dg2_power_well_count(display, new_cdclk_state);
 
-	dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk_mhz,
-			       update_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
+	ret = dg2_cdclk_pcode_notify(display, voltage_level, num_active_pipes, cdclk_mhz,
+				     update_cdclk, update_pipe_count);
+	if (ret)
+		drm_err(display->drm,
+			"Failed to inform PCODE about end of CDCLK change (%d)\n", ret);
 }
 
 bool intel_cdclk_is_decreasing_later(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-26 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-26 13:40 [PATCH v2 00/14] drm/i915/cdclk: cdclk pcode related fixes and refactoring Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Don't bail if pcode post nofify fails Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Pass CDCLK in MHz to pcode on DG2 Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Do the DG2 CDCLK/pipe power well notify properly Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Notify DG2 pcode about pipe power wells regardless of CDCLK Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Stop forcing voltage level to 3 all the time on DG2 Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Drop pointless platform check from bxt_set_cdclk() Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] drm/i915/dg2: s/intel_/dg2_/ for DG2 specific stuff Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Unify the pcode pre/post notify in bxt_set_cdclk() Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Extract bdw_cdclk_pcode_{pre, post}_notify() Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Extract skl_cdclk_pcode_{pre, post}_notify() Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Extract bxt_cdclk_pcode_{pre, post}_notify() Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Introduce CDCLK .{pre, post}_notify() vfuncs Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:40 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Hoist intel_cdclk_{pre, post}_notify() calls upwards Ville Syrjala
2026-08-26 13:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/i915/cdclk: cdclk pcode related fixes and refactoring (rev2) Patchwork
2026-08-26 14:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-26 18:28 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260826134033.13976-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox