[PATCH v2 06/14] drm/i915/cdclk: Drop pointless platform check from bxt_set_cdclk()

[Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>]

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Overwrite cdclk.hw.voltage_level from intel_update_cdclk() at the
end on bxt_set_cdclk() also on bxt/glk. While this isn't actually
necessary due to bxt/glk not having any extra DDI based voltage
level requirements, it does avoid one less silly 'if' in the code.

On icl+ the value derived by bxt_get_cdclk() may not be correct
if the voltage level was bumped up due to DDI requirements, thus
overwriting the assumed value is crucial there.

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
index e05b6e76363c..6453a7cc0cee 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
@@ -2335,12 +2335,11 @@ static void bxt_set_cdclk(struct intel_display *display,
 
 	intel_update_cdclk(display);
 
-	if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 11)
-		/*
-		 * Can't read out the voltage level :(
-		 * Let's just assume everything is as expected.
-		 */
-		display->cdclk.hw.voltage_level = cdclk_config->voltage_level;
+	/*
+	 * Can't read out the voltage level :(
+	 * Let's just assume everything is as expected.
+	 */
+	display->cdclk.hw.voltage_level = cdclk_config->voltage_level;
 }
 
 static void bxt_sanitize_cdclk(struct intel_display *display)
-- 
2.54.0