From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Michael J. Ruhl" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/18] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 18:42:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904184216.3AFCE1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904182451.1164868-25-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] NULL pointer dereference in `pmt_telem_read32()` for callback-managed endpoints.
- [High] Resource access control bypass via sysfs `mmap` for callback-managed endpoints.
- [Medium] Application Energy Telemetry (AET) integration silently fails for callback-managed endpoints.
--
commit 4b5eaf240c4891c9b29025f06df395bf25b62269
Author: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks
A callback indicates that the parent driver is responsible for accessing
the data area. Creating a PMT memory remap is redundant. If a read_telem
callback has been provided, do not create a remap.
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> index 402d51df834a6..1c7a372b4fc42 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -403,14 +403,19 @@ static int intel_pmt_dev_register(struct intel_pmt_entry *entry,
> if (!entry->size)
> return 0;
>
> - res.start = entry->base_addr;
> - res.end = res.start + entry->size - 1;
> - res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> + /*
> + * The read_telem callback is responsible for this mapping, and may have
> + * different requirements for use. If the callback is present do not
> + * create the map.
> + */
> + if (!(entry->cb && entry->cb->read_telem)) {
> + struct resource res = DEFINE_RES_MEM(entry->base_addr, entry->size);
>
> - entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> - if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> - goto fail_ioremap;
> + entry->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, &res);
> + if (IS_ERR(entry->base)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(entry->base);
> + goto fail_ioremap;
> + }
> }
[Severity: High]
Does leaving entry->base unmapped cause a NULL pointer dereference in
pmt_telem_read32()?
Because entry->base is intentionally left unmapped (NULL) for callback-managed
devices, any invocation of pmt_telem_read32() on such a device will
unconditionally dereference ep->base:
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/telemetry.c:pmt_telem_read32() {
...
memcpy_fromio(data, ep->base + offset, NUM_BYTES_DWORD(count));
...
}
[Severity: High]
Does unconditionally registering intel_pmt_mmap() in this function allow
userspace to bypass the device-specific callback requirements?
If a callback is required for safe access, the mmap handler still directly maps
the physical address to userspace:
drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/class.c:intel_pmt_mmap() {
...
if (io_remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start, pfn,
vsize, vma->vm_page_prot))
return -EAGAIN;
...
}
Because entry->pmt_bin_attr.mmap = intel_pmt_mmap; is unconditionally set a
few lines below, this exposes a lockless bypass to userspace for hardware that
explicitly requires callback synchronization.
[Severity: Medium]
Will this silently break Application Energy Telemetry (AET) integration for
callback-managed endpoints?
During runtime reads, the AET driver expects the region address to be mapped,
but since it is now NULL, it skips all regions without emitting errors:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c:intel_aet_read_event() {
...
for (int i = 0; i < e->pfg->count; i++) {
if (!e->pfg->regions[i].addr)
continue;
...
evtcount = readq(e->pfg->regions[i].addr + idx * sizeof(u64));
...
}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904182451.1164868-20-michael.j.ruhl@intel.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 18:24 [PATCH v6 00/18] Crescent Island PMT support Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 01/18] platform/x86/intel/pmt: complete pcidev to device update Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 02/18] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rmw with a return value Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 03/18] platform/x86/intel/pmt: refactor rc " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 04/18] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add register access callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 05/18] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Do not remap when using callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:42 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-04 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 06/18] drm/xe/vsec: Do not register BMG PMT for VF Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 07/18] drm/xe/vsec: Correct locking order Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 08/18] drm/xe/vsec: Use correct pm state get Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 09/18] drm/xe/vsec: Add DOC text for VSEC Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v6 10/18] drm/xe/vsec: Support possible hotplug exit Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v6 11/18] drm/xe/vsec: Support Crescent Island PMT Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v6 12/18] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor BattleMage PMT defines Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 19:37 ` Ruhl, Michael J
2026-09-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v6 13/18] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT decode Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v6 14/18] drm/xe/vsec: Crescent Island PMT callbacks Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v6 15/18] drm/xe/vsec: Support late bind fw information Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v6 16/18] drm/xe/vsec: Add PMT GUID internal access Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v6 17/18] drm/xe/vsec: Update PMT " Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 18:25 ` [PATCH v6 18/18] drm/xe/vsec: Refactor platform check Michael J. Ruhl
2026-09-04 18:55 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Crescent Island PMT support (rev8) Patchwork
2026-09-04 18:56 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904184216.3AFCE1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox