Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lis, Tomasz" <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/30] drm/xe/vf: Wakeup in GuC backend on VF post migration recovery
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 00:27:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22e28a11-7798-4f90-a09c-cb20850c5988@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251006111038.2234860-15-matthew.brost@intel.com>


On 10/6/2025 1:10 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> If VF post-migration recovery is in progress, the recovery flow will
> rebuild all GuC submission state. In this case, exit all waiters to
> ensure that submission queue scheduling can also be paused. Avoid taking
> any adverse actions after aborting the wait.
>
> As part of waking up the GuC backend, suspend_wait can now return
> -EAGAIN indicating the waiter should be retried. If the caller is
> running on work item, that work item need to be requeued to avoid a
> deadlock for the work item blocking the VF migration recovery work item.
>
> v3:
>   - Don't block in preempt fence work queue as this can interfere with VF
>     post-migration work queue scheduling leading to deadlock (Testing)
>   - Use xe_gt_recovery_inprogress (Michal)
> v5:
>   - Use static function for vf_recovery (Michal)
>   - Add helper to wake CT waiters (Michal)
>   - Move some code to following patch (Michal)
>   - Adjust commit message to explain suspend_wait returning -EAGAIN (Michal)
>   - Add kernel doc to suspend_wait around returning -EAGAIN
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h |  3 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c      |  4 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h           |  9 +++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c       | 82 ++++++++++++++++++------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c    | 11 ++++
>   5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> index 27b76cf9da89..282505fa1377 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ struct xe_exec_queue_ops {
>   	 * call after suspend. In dma-fencing path thus must return within a
>   	 * reasonable amount of time. -ETIME return shall indicate an error
>   	 * waiting for suspend resulting in associated VM getting killed.
> +	 * -EAGAIN return indicates the wait should be tried again, if the wait
> +	 * is within a work item, the work item should be requeued as deadlock
> +	 * avoidance mechanism.
>   	 */
>   	int (*suspend_wait)(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
>   	/**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> index 7057260175f3..7f703336d692 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>   #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
>   #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h"
>   #include "xe_guc.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
>   #include "xe_guc_hxg_helpers.h"
>   #include "xe_guc_relay.h"
>   #include "xe_guc_submit.h"
> @@ -743,6 +744,9 @@ static void vf_start_migration_recovery(struct xe_gt *gt)
>   	    !gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_teardown) {
>   		gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_queued = true;
>   		WRITE_ONCE(gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_inprogress, true);
> +		smp_wmb();	/* Ensure above write visable before wake */
> +
> +		xe_guc_ct_wake_waiters(&gt->uc.guc.ct);
>   
>   		started = queue_work(gt->ordered_wq, &gt->sriov.vf.migration.worker);
>   		xe_gt_sriov_info(gt, "VF migration recovery %s\n", started ?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h
> index d6c81325a76c..ca0ec938edac 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h
> @@ -72,4 +72,13 @@ xe_guc_ct_send_block_no_fail(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len)
>   
>   long xe_guc_ct_queue_proc_time_jiffies(struct xe_guc_ct *ct);
>   
> +/**
> + * xe_guc_ct_wake_waiters() - GuC CT wake up waiters
> + * @guc: GuC CT object
> + */
> +static inline void xe_guc_ct_wake_waiters(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> +{
> +	wake_up_all(&ct->wq);
> +}
> +
>   #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 59371b7cc8a4..b2ca4911efe9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
>   #include "xe_gt.h"
>   #include "xe_gt_clock.h"
>   #include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> -#include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
>   #include "xe_guc.h"
>   #include "xe_guc_capture.h"
>   #include "xe_guc_ct.h"
> @@ -702,6 +701,11 @@ static u32 wq_space_until_wrap(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   	return (WQ_SIZE - q->guc->wqi_tail);
>   }
>   
> +static bool vf_recovery(struct xe_guc *guc)
> +{
> +	return xe_gt_recovery_pending(guc_to_gt(guc));
> +}
> +
>   static int wq_wait_for_space(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32 wqi_size)
>   {
>   	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> @@ -711,7 +715,7 @@ static int wq_wait_for_space(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32 wqi_size)
>   
>   #define AVAILABLE_SPACE \
>   	CIRC_SPACE(q->guc->wqi_tail, q->guc->wqi_head, WQ_SIZE)
> -	if (wqi_size > AVAILABLE_SPACE) {
> +	if (wqi_size > AVAILABLE_SPACE && !vf_recovery(guc)) {
>   try_again:
>   		q->guc->wqi_head = parallel_read(xe, map, wq_desc.head);
>   		if (wqi_size > AVAILABLE_SPACE) {
> @@ -910,9 +914,10 @@ static void disable_scheduling_deregister(struct xe_guc *guc,
>   	ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
>   				 (!exec_queue_pending_enable(q) &&
>   				  !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)) ||
> -					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc),
> +					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> +					 vf_recovery(guc),
>   				 HZ * 5);
> -	if (!ret) {
> +	if (!ret && !vf_recovery(guc)) {

Is it possible for vf_recovery() to change its retval between the above 
llines? Ending the wait due to recovery, and then forgetting that happened?

Maybe we should assign to a local?

(concerns all places where we do the check this way)

-Tomasz

>   		struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
>   
>   		xe_gt_warn(q->gt, "Pending enable/disable failed to respond\n");
> @@ -1015,6 +1020,10 @@ static void xe_guc_exec_queue_lr_cleanup(struct work_struct *w)
>   	bool wedged = false;
>   
>   	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), xe_exec_queue_is_lr(q));
> +
> +	if (vf_recovery(guc))
> +		return;
> +
>   	trace_xe_exec_queue_lr_cleanup(q);
>   
>   	if (!exec_queue_killed(q))
> @@ -1047,7 +1056,11 @@ static void xe_guc_exec_queue_lr_cleanup(struct work_struct *w)
>   		 */
>   		ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
>   					 !exec_queue_pending_disable(q) ||
> -					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
> +					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> +					 vf_recovery(guc), HZ * 5);
> +		if (vf_recovery(guc))
> +			return;
> +
>   		if (!ret) {
>   			xe_gt_warn(q->gt, "Schedule disable failed to respond, guc_id=%d\n",
>   				   q->guc->id);
> @@ -1137,8 +1150,9 @@ static void enable_scheduling(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   
>   	ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
>   				 !exec_queue_pending_enable(q) ||
> -				 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
> -	if (!ret || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) {
> +				 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> +				 vf_recovery(guc), HZ * 5);
> +	if ((!ret && !vf_recovery(guc)) || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) {
>   		xe_gt_warn(guc_to_gt(guc), "Schedule enable failed to respond");
>   		set_exec_queue_banned(q);
>   		xe_gt_reset_async(q->gt);
> @@ -1209,7 +1223,8 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
>   	 * list so job can be freed and kick scheduler ensuring free job is not
>   	 * lost.
>   	 */
> -	if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &job->fence->flags))
> +	if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &job->fence->flags) ||
> +	    vf_recovery(guc))
>   		return DRM_GPU_SCHED_STAT_NO_HANG;
>   
>   	/* Kill the run_job entry point */
> @@ -1261,7 +1276,10 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
>   			ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
>   						 (!exec_queue_pending_enable(q) &&
>   						  !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)) ||
> -						 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
> +						 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> +						 vf_recovery(guc), HZ * 5);
> +			if (vf_recovery(guc))
> +				goto handle_vf_resume;
>   			if (!ret || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc))
>   				goto trigger_reset;
>   
> @@ -1286,7 +1304,10 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
>   		smp_rmb();
>   		ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
>   					 !exec_queue_pending_disable(q) ||
> -					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
> +					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> +					 vf_recovery(guc), HZ * 5);
> +		if (vf_recovery(guc))
> +			goto handle_vf_resume;
>   		if (!ret || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) {
>   trigger_reset:
>   			if (!ret)
> @@ -1391,6 +1412,7 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
>   	 * some thought, do this in a follow up.
>   	 */
>   	xe_sched_submission_start(sched);
> +handle_vf_resume:
>   	return DRM_GPU_SCHED_STAT_NO_HANG;
>   }
>   
> @@ -1487,11 +1509,17 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(struct xe_sched_msg *ms
>   
>   static void __suspend_fence_signal(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   {
> +	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> +
>   	if (!q->guc->suspend_pending)
>   		return;
>   
>   	WRITE_ONCE(q->guc->suspend_pending, false);
> -	wake_up(&q->guc->suspend_wait);
> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> +		wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq);
> +	else
> +		wake_up(&q->guc->suspend_wait);
>   }
>   
>   static void suspend_fence_signal(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> @@ -1512,8 +1540,9 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
>   
>   	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && !exec_queue_suspended(q) &&
>   	    exec_queue_enabled(q)) {
> -		wait_event(guc->ct.wq, (q->guc->resume_time != RESUME_PENDING ||
> -			   xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) && !exec_queue_pending_disable(q));
> +		wait_event(guc->ct.wq, vf_recovery(guc) ||
> +			   ((q->guc->resume_time != RESUME_PENDING ||
> +			   xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) && !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)));
>   
>   		if (!xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) {
>   			s64 since_resume_ms =
> @@ -1640,7 +1669,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_init(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   
>   	q->entity = &ge->entity;
>   
> -	if (xe_guc_read_stopped(guc))
> +	if (xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) || vf_recovery(guc))
>   		xe_sched_stop(sched);
>   
>   	mutex_unlock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
> @@ -1786,6 +1815,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_suspend(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   static int guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   {
>   	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
>   	int ret;
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -1793,11 +1823,22 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>   	 * suspend_pending upon kill but to be paranoid but races in which
>   	 * suspend_pending is set after kill also check kill here.
>   	 */
> -	ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(q->guc->suspend_wait,
> -					       !READ_ONCE(q->guc->suspend_pending) ||
> -					       exec_queue_killed(q) ||
> -					       xe_guc_read_stopped(guc),
> -					       HZ * 5);
> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> +		ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
> +						       !READ_ONCE(q->guc->suspend_pending) ||
> +						       exec_queue_killed(q) ||
> +						       xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> +						       vf_recovery(guc),
> +						       HZ * 5);
> +	else
> +		ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(q->guc->suspend_wait,
> +						       !READ_ONCE(q->guc->suspend_pending) ||
> +						       exec_queue_killed(q) ||
> +						       xe_guc_read_stopped(guc),
> +						       HZ * 5);
> +
> +	if (vf_recovery(guc) && !xe_device_wedged((guc_to_xe(guc))))
> +		return -EAGAIN;
>   
>   	if (!ret) {
>   		xe_gt_warn(guc_to_gt(guc),
> @@ -1905,8 +1946,7 @@ int xe_guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
>   {
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	if (xe_gt_WARN_ON(guc_to_gt(guc),
> -			  xe_gt_sriov_vf_recovery_pending(guc_to_gt(guc))))
> +	if (xe_gt_WARN_ON(guc_to_gt(guc), vf_recovery(guc)))
>   		return 0;
>   
>   	if (!guc->submission_state.initialized)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c
> index 83fbeea5aa20..7f587ca3947d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   
>   #include "xe_exec_queue.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> +#include "xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h"
>   #include "xe_vm.h"
>   
>   static void preempt_fence_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
> @@ -22,6 +24,15 @@ static void preempt_fence_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
>   	} else if (!q->ops->reset_status(q)) {
>   		int err = q->ops->suspend_wait(q);
>   
> +		if (err == -EAGAIN) {
> +			xe_gt_dbg(q->gt, "PREEMPT FENCE RETRY guc_id=%d",
> +				  q->guc->id);
> +			queue_work(q->vm->xe->preempt_fence_wq,
> +				   &pfence->preempt_work);
> +			dma_fence_end_signalling(cookie);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
>   		if (err)
>   			dma_fence_set_error(&pfence->base, err);
>   	} else {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-06 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-06 11:10 [PATCH v6 00/30] VF migration redesign Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 01/30] drm/xe: Add NULL checks to scratch LRC allocation Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 21:51   ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 02/30] drm/xe: Save off position in ring in which a job was programmed Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 03/30] drm/xe/guc: Track pending-enable source in submission state Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 04/30] drm/xe: Track LR jobs in DRM scheduler pending list Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 05/30] drm/xe: Don't change LRC ring head on job resubmission Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 06/30] drm/xe: Make LRC W/A scratch buffer usage consistent Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 07/30] drm/xe/vf: Add xe_gt_recovery_pending helper Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 13:10   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 08/30] drm/xe/vf: Make VF recovery run on per-GT worker Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 09/30] drm/xe/vf: Abort H2G sends during VF post-migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 10/30] drm/xe/vf: Remove memory allocations from VF post migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 11/30] drm/xe/vf: Close multi-GT GGTT shift race Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 14:27   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 14:56     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 12/30] drm/xe/vf: Teardown VF post migration worker on driver unload Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 13/30] drm/xe/vf: Don't allow GT reset to be queued during VF post migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 14/30] drm/xe/vf: Wakeup in GuC backend on " Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 14:35   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 15:54     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 22:27   ` Lis, Tomasz [this message]
2025-10-06 23:07     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 15/30] drm/xe/vf: Avoid indefinite blocking in preempt rebind worker for VFs supporting migration Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 16/30] drm/xe/vf: Use GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT for GuC context register Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 14:51   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 16:02     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 22:21   ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-06 22:57     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 17/30] drm/xe/vf: Flush and stop CTs in VF post migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 18/30] drm/xe/vf: Reset TLB invalidations during " Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 19/30] drm/xe/vf: Kickstart after resfix in " Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 20/30] drm/xe/vf: Start CTs before resfix " Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 21:50   ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 21/30] drm/xe/vf: Abort VF post migration recovery on failure Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 22/30] drm/xe/vf: Replay GuC submission state on pause / unpause Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 23/30] drm/xe: Move queue init before LRC creation Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 15:22   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 21:33   ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 24/30] drm/xe/vf: Add debug prints for GuC replaying state during VF recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 25/30] drm/xe/vf: Workaround for race condition in GuC firmware during VF pause Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 26/30] drm/xe: Use PPGTT addresses for TLB invalidation to avoid GGTT fixups Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 27/30] drm/xe/vf: Use primary GT ordered work queue on media GT on PTL VF Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 22:24   ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-06 22:51     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-07 17:00       ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-07 17:22         ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-07 20:36           ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-07 21:18             ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 28/30] drm/xe/vf: Ensure media GT VF recovery runs after primary GT on PTL Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 29/30] drm/xe/vf: Rebase CCS save/restore BB GGTT addresses Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 30/30] drm/xe/guc: Increase wait timeout to 2sec after BUSY reply from GuC Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:17 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for VF migration redesign (rev6) Patchwork
2025-10-06 11:18 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-06 12:24 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-06 14:28 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-10-07  0:20 ` [PATCH v6 00/30] VF migration redesign Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-07  1:11   ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22e28a11-7798-4f90-a09c-cb20850c5988@intel.com \
    --to=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox