Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: "Lis, Tomasz" <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/30] drm/xe/vf: Wakeup in GuC backend on VF post migration recovery
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 16:07:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aORLmskITZSR33rh@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22e28a11-7798-4f90-a09c-cb20850c5988@intel.com>

On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 12:27:06AM +0200, Lis, Tomasz wrote:
> 
> On 10/6/2025 1:10 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > If VF post-migration recovery is in progress, the recovery flow will
> > rebuild all GuC submission state. In this case, exit all waiters to
> > ensure that submission queue scheduling can also be paused. Avoid taking
> > any adverse actions after aborting the wait.
> > 
> > As part of waking up the GuC backend, suspend_wait can now return
> > -EAGAIN indicating the waiter should be retried. If the caller is
> > running on work item, that work item need to be requeued to avoid a
> > deadlock for the work item blocking the VF migration recovery work item.
> > 
> > v3:
> >   - Don't block in preempt fence work queue as this can interfere with VF
> >     post-migration work queue scheduling leading to deadlock (Testing)
> >   - Use xe_gt_recovery_inprogress (Michal)
> > v5:
> >   - Use static function for vf_recovery (Michal)
> >   - Add helper to wake CT waiters (Michal)
> >   - Move some code to following patch (Michal)
> >   - Adjust commit message to explain suspend_wait returning -EAGAIN (Michal)
> >   - Add kernel doc to suspend_wait around returning -EAGAIN
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h |  3 +
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c      |  4 ++
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h           |  9 +++
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c       | 82 ++++++++++++++++++------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c    | 11 ++++
> >   5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> > index 27b76cf9da89..282505fa1377 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> > @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ struct xe_exec_queue_ops {
> >   	 * call after suspend. In dma-fencing path thus must return within a
> >   	 * reasonable amount of time. -ETIME return shall indicate an error
> >   	 * waiting for suspend resulting in associated VM getting killed.
> > +	 * -EAGAIN return indicates the wait should be tried again, if the wait
> > +	 * is within a work item, the work item should be requeued as deadlock
> > +	 * avoidance mechanism.
> >   	 */
> >   	int (*suspend_wait)(struct xe_exec_queue *q);
> >   	/**
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> > index 7057260175f3..7f703336d692 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_sriov_vf.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >   #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
> >   #include "xe_gt_sriov_vf_types.h"
> >   #include "xe_guc.h"
> > +#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
> >   #include "xe_guc_hxg_helpers.h"
> >   #include "xe_guc_relay.h"
> >   #include "xe_guc_submit.h"
> > @@ -743,6 +744,9 @@ static void vf_start_migration_recovery(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >   	    !gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_teardown) {
> >   		gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_queued = true;
> >   		WRITE_ONCE(gt->sriov.vf.migration.recovery_inprogress, true);
> > +		smp_wmb();	/* Ensure above write visable before wake */
> > +
> > +		xe_guc_ct_wake_waiters(&gt->uc.guc.ct);
> >   		started = queue_work(gt->ordered_wq, &gt->sriov.vf.migration.worker);
> >   		xe_gt_sriov_info(gt, "VF migration recovery %s\n", started ?
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h
> > index d6c81325a76c..ca0ec938edac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.h
> > @@ -72,4 +72,13 @@ xe_guc_ct_send_block_no_fail(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len)
> >   long xe_guc_ct_queue_proc_time_jiffies(struct xe_guc_ct *ct);
> > +/**
> > + * xe_guc_ct_wake_waiters() - GuC CT wake up waiters
> > + * @guc: GuC CT object
> > + */
> > +static inline void xe_guc_ct_wake_waiters(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> > +{
> > +	wake_up_all(&ct->wq);
> > +}
> > +
> >   #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > index 59371b7cc8a4..b2ca4911efe9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
> >   #include "xe_gt.h"
> >   #include "xe_gt_clock.h"
> >   #include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> > -#include "xe_gt_sriov_vf.h"
> >   #include "xe_guc.h"
> >   #include "xe_guc_capture.h"
> >   #include "xe_guc_ct.h"
> > @@ -702,6 +701,11 @@ static u32 wq_space_until_wrap(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> >   	return (WQ_SIZE - q->guc->wqi_tail);
> >   }
> > +static bool vf_recovery(struct xe_guc *guc)
> > +{
> > +	return xe_gt_recovery_pending(guc_to_gt(guc));
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int wq_wait_for_space(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32 wqi_size)
> >   {
> >   	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> > @@ -711,7 +715,7 @@ static int wq_wait_for_space(struct xe_exec_queue *q, u32 wqi_size)
> >   #define AVAILABLE_SPACE \
> >   	CIRC_SPACE(q->guc->wqi_tail, q->guc->wqi_head, WQ_SIZE)
> > -	if (wqi_size > AVAILABLE_SPACE) {
> > +	if (wqi_size > AVAILABLE_SPACE && !vf_recovery(guc)) {
> >   try_again:
> >   		q->guc->wqi_head = parallel_read(xe, map, wq_desc.head);
> >   		if (wqi_size > AVAILABLE_SPACE) {
> > @@ -910,9 +914,10 @@ static void disable_scheduling_deregister(struct xe_guc *guc,
> >   	ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
> >   				 (!exec_queue_pending_enable(q) &&
> >   				  !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)) ||
> > -					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc),
> > +					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> > +					 vf_recovery(guc),
> >   				 HZ * 5);
> > -	if (!ret) {
> > +	if (!ret && !vf_recovery(guc)) {
> 
> Is it possible for vf_recovery() to change its retval between the above
> llines? Ending the wait due to recovery, and then forgetting that happened?
> 

I don't think in practice this can change. The first thing the resfix
IRQ does is wakeup all waiters so these should immediately pop out. Most
of the waiters are in the queue stopping path which VF recovery triggers
so vf_recovery shouldn't be able to change. The waiter which is not is a
suspend fence, I think I need to add a little extra logic there to fixup
that path.

> Maybe we should assign to a local?
> 

I don't think that is possible with how wait_event_timeout is designed.

Matt

> (concerns all places where we do the check this way)
> 
> -Tomasz
> 
> >   		struct xe_gpu_scheduler *sched = &q->guc->sched;
> >   		xe_gt_warn(q->gt, "Pending enable/disable failed to respond\n");
> > @@ -1015,6 +1020,10 @@ static void xe_guc_exec_queue_lr_cleanup(struct work_struct *w)
> >   	bool wedged = false;
> >   	xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), xe_exec_queue_is_lr(q));
> > +
> > +	if (vf_recovery(guc))
> > +		return;
> > +
> >   	trace_xe_exec_queue_lr_cleanup(q);
> >   	if (!exec_queue_killed(q))
> > @@ -1047,7 +1056,11 @@ static void xe_guc_exec_queue_lr_cleanup(struct work_struct *w)
> >   		 */
> >   		ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
> >   					 !exec_queue_pending_disable(q) ||
> > -					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
> > +					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> > +					 vf_recovery(guc), HZ * 5);
> > +		if (vf_recovery(guc))
> > +			return;
> > +
> >   		if (!ret) {
> >   			xe_gt_warn(q->gt, "Schedule disable failed to respond, guc_id=%d\n",
> >   				   q->guc->id);
> > @@ -1137,8 +1150,9 @@ static void enable_scheduling(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> >   	ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
> >   				 !exec_queue_pending_enable(q) ||
> > -				 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
> > -	if (!ret || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) {
> > +				 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> > +				 vf_recovery(guc), HZ * 5);
> > +	if ((!ret && !vf_recovery(guc)) || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) {
> >   		xe_gt_warn(guc_to_gt(guc), "Schedule enable failed to respond");
> >   		set_exec_queue_banned(q);
> >   		xe_gt_reset_async(q->gt);
> > @@ -1209,7 +1223,8 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
> >   	 * list so job can be freed and kick scheduler ensuring free job is not
> >   	 * lost.
> >   	 */
> > -	if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &job->fence->flags))
> > +	if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &job->fence->flags) ||
> > +	    vf_recovery(guc))
> >   		return DRM_GPU_SCHED_STAT_NO_HANG;
> >   	/* Kill the run_job entry point */
> > @@ -1261,7 +1276,10 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
> >   			ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
> >   						 (!exec_queue_pending_enable(q) &&
> >   						  !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)) ||
> > -						 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
> > +						 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> > +						 vf_recovery(guc), HZ * 5);
> > +			if (vf_recovery(guc))
> > +				goto handle_vf_resume;
> >   			if (!ret || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc))
> >   				goto trigger_reset;
> > @@ -1286,7 +1304,10 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
> >   		smp_rmb();
> >   		ret = wait_event_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
> >   					 !exec_queue_pending_disable(q) ||
> > -					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc), HZ * 5);
> > +					 xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> > +					 vf_recovery(guc), HZ * 5);
> > +		if (vf_recovery(guc))
> > +			goto handle_vf_resume;
> >   		if (!ret || xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) {
> >   trigger_reset:
> >   			if (!ret)
> > @@ -1391,6 +1412,7 @@ guc_exec_queue_timedout_job(struct drm_sched_job *drm_job)
> >   	 * some thought, do this in a follow up.
> >   	 */
> >   	xe_sched_submission_start(sched);
> > +handle_vf_resume:
> >   	return DRM_GPU_SCHED_STAT_NO_HANG;
> >   }
> > @@ -1487,11 +1509,17 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_set_sched_props(struct xe_sched_msg *ms
> >   static void __suspend_fence_signal(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> >   {
> > +	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> > +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> > +
> >   	if (!q->guc->suspend_pending)
> >   		return;
> >   	WRITE_ONCE(q->guc->suspend_pending, false);
> > -	wake_up(&q->guc->suspend_wait);
> > +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> > +		wake_up_all(&guc->ct.wq);
> > +	else
> > +		wake_up(&q->guc->suspend_wait);
> >   }
> >   static void suspend_fence_signal(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> > @@ -1512,8 +1540,9 @@ static void __guc_exec_queue_process_msg_suspend(struct xe_sched_msg *msg)
> >   	if (guc_exec_queue_allowed_to_change_state(q) && !exec_queue_suspended(q) &&
> >   	    exec_queue_enabled(q)) {
> > -		wait_event(guc->ct.wq, (q->guc->resume_time != RESUME_PENDING ||
> > -			   xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) && !exec_queue_pending_disable(q));
> > +		wait_event(guc->ct.wq, vf_recovery(guc) ||
> > +			   ((q->guc->resume_time != RESUME_PENDING ||
> > +			   xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) && !exec_queue_pending_disable(q)));
> >   		if (!xe_guc_read_stopped(guc)) {
> >   			s64 since_resume_ms =
> > @@ -1640,7 +1669,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_init(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> >   	q->entity = &ge->entity;
> > -	if (xe_guc_read_stopped(guc))
> > +	if (xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) || vf_recovery(guc))
> >   		xe_sched_stop(sched);
> >   	mutex_unlock(&guc->submission_state.lock);
> > @@ -1786,6 +1815,7 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_suspend(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> >   static int guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> >   {
> >   	struct xe_guc *guc = exec_queue_to_guc(q);
> > +	struct xe_device *xe = guc_to_xe(guc);
> >   	int ret;
> >   	/*
> > @@ -1793,11 +1823,22 @@ static int guc_exec_queue_suspend_wait(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
> >   	 * suspend_pending upon kill but to be paranoid but races in which
> >   	 * suspend_pending is set after kill also check kill here.
> >   	 */
> > -	ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(q->guc->suspend_wait,
> > -					       !READ_ONCE(q->guc->suspend_pending) ||
> > -					       exec_queue_killed(q) ||
> > -					       xe_guc_read_stopped(guc),
> > -					       HZ * 5);
> > +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> > +		ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(guc->ct.wq,
> > +						       !READ_ONCE(q->guc->suspend_pending) ||
> > +						       exec_queue_killed(q) ||
> > +						       xe_guc_read_stopped(guc) ||
> > +						       vf_recovery(guc),
> > +						       HZ * 5);
> > +	else
> > +		ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(q->guc->suspend_wait,
> > +						       !READ_ONCE(q->guc->suspend_pending) ||
> > +						       exec_queue_killed(q) ||
> > +						       xe_guc_read_stopped(guc),
> > +						       HZ * 5);
> > +
> > +	if (vf_recovery(guc) && !xe_device_wedged((guc_to_xe(guc))))
> > +		return -EAGAIN;
> >   	if (!ret) {
> >   		xe_gt_warn(guc_to_gt(guc),
> > @@ -1905,8 +1946,7 @@ int xe_guc_submit_reset_prepare(struct xe_guc *guc)
> >   {
> >   	int ret;
> > -	if (xe_gt_WARN_ON(guc_to_gt(guc),
> > -			  xe_gt_sriov_vf_recovery_pending(guc_to_gt(guc))))
> > +	if (xe_gt_WARN_ON(guc_to_gt(guc), vf_recovery(guc)))
> >   		return 0;
> >   	if (!guc->submission_state.initialized)
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c
> > index 83fbeea5aa20..7f587ca3947d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_preempt_fence.c
> > @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> >   #include <linux/slab.h>
> >   #include "xe_exec_queue.h"
> > +#include "xe_gt_printk.h"
> > +#include "xe_guc_exec_queue_types.h"
> >   #include "xe_vm.h"
> >   static void preempt_fence_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
> > @@ -22,6 +24,15 @@ static void preempt_fence_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
> >   	} else if (!q->ops->reset_status(q)) {
> >   		int err = q->ops->suspend_wait(q);
> > +		if (err == -EAGAIN) {
> > +			xe_gt_dbg(q->gt, "PREEMPT FENCE RETRY guc_id=%d",
> > +				  q->guc->id);
> > +			queue_work(q->vm->xe->preempt_fence_wq,
> > +				   &pfence->preempt_work);
> > +			dma_fence_end_signalling(cookie);
> > +			return;
> > +		}
> > +
> >   		if (err)
> >   			dma_fence_set_error(&pfence->base, err);
> >   	} else {

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-06 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-06 11:10 [PATCH v6 00/30] VF migration redesign Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 01/30] drm/xe: Add NULL checks to scratch LRC allocation Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 21:51   ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 02/30] drm/xe: Save off position in ring in which a job was programmed Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 03/30] drm/xe/guc: Track pending-enable source in submission state Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 04/30] drm/xe: Track LR jobs in DRM scheduler pending list Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 05/30] drm/xe: Don't change LRC ring head on job resubmission Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 06/30] drm/xe: Make LRC W/A scratch buffer usage consistent Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 07/30] drm/xe/vf: Add xe_gt_recovery_pending helper Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 13:10   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 08/30] drm/xe/vf: Make VF recovery run on per-GT worker Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 09/30] drm/xe/vf: Abort H2G sends during VF post-migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 10/30] drm/xe/vf: Remove memory allocations from VF post migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 11/30] drm/xe/vf: Close multi-GT GGTT shift race Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 14:27   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 14:56     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 12/30] drm/xe/vf: Teardown VF post migration worker on driver unload Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 13/30] drm/xe/vf: Don't allow GT reset to be queued during VF post migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 14/30] drm/xe/vf: Wakeup in GuC backend on " Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 14:35   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 15:54     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 22:27   ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-06 23:07     ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 15/30] drm/xe/vf: Avoid indefinite blocking in preempt rebind worker for VFs supporting migration Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 16/30] drm/xe/vf: Use GUC_HXG_TYPE_EVENT for GuC context register Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 14:51   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 16:02     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 22:21   ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-06 22:57     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 17/30] drm/xe/vf: Flush and stop CTs in VF post migration recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 18/30] drm/xe/vf: Reset TLB invalidations during " Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 19/30] drm/xe/vf: Kickstart after resfix in " Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 20/30] drm/xe/vf: Start CTs before resfix " Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 21:50   ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 21/30] drm/xe/vf: Abort VF post migration recovery on failure Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 22/30] drm/xe/vf: Replay GuC submission state on pause / unpause Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 23/30] drm/xe: Move queue init before LRC creation Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 15:22   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-10-06 21:33   ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 24/30] drm/xe/vf: Add debug prints for GuC replaying state during VF recovery Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 25/30] drm/xe/vf: Workaround for race condition in GuC firmware during VF pause Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 26/30] drm/xe: Use PPGTT addresses for TLB invalidation to avoid GGTT fixups Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 27/30] drm/xe/vf: Use primary GT ordered work queue on media GT on PTL VF Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 22:24   ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-06 22:51     ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-07 17:00       ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-07 17:22         ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-07 20:36           ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-10-07 21:18             ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 28/30] drm/xe/vf: Ensure media GT VF recovery runs after primary GT on PTL Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 29/30] drm/xe/vf: Rebase CCS save/restore BB GGTT addresses Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:10 ` [PATCH v6 30/30] drm/xe/guc: Increase wait timeout to 2sec after BUSY reply from GuC Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:17 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for VF migration redesign (rev6) Patchwork
2025-10-06 11:18 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-10-06 12:24 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-10-06 14:28 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-10-07  0:20 ` [PATCH v6 00/30] VF migration redesign Niranjana Vishwanathapura
2025-10-07  1:11   ` Matthew Brost

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aORLmskITZSR33rh@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox