From: "Poosa, Karthik" <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
To: "Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<badal.nilawar@intel.com>, <raag.jadav@intel.com>,
<sk.anirban@intel.com>, <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>,
<soham.purkait@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/hwmon: Increase timeout for mailbox power limits
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 12:24:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c61329e-a7d0-4524-b585-5d10fd970ffe@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad776a91-9b0a-4a72-8b05-8890a7b5a4cd@intel.com>
On 31-08-2026 10:59, Tauro, Riana wrote:
>
> On 29-07-2026 22:45, Karthik Poosa wrote:
>> Mailbox power limit operations can occasionally take longer than the
>> current 1 ms timeout, causing sporadic failures.
>> Increase the timeout to 10 ms and rename PL_WRITE_MBX_TIMEOUT_MS to
>> PL_MBX_TIMEOUT_MS to better reflect its usage.
>
> Why is the timeout applicable only for power and not the other
> attribute reads?
>
> Thanks
> Riana
Because the timeout is seen only with mailbox power limit commands only,
default 1ms timeout wasn't enough here.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
>> index de3f2aeffc3f..459ad953dfc8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hwmon.c
>> @@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ enum sensor_attr_power {
>> #define PWR_ATTR_TO_STR(attr) (((attr) == hwmon_power_max) ?
>> "PL1" : "PL2")
>> /*
>> - * Timeout for power limit write mailbox command.
>> + * Timeout for power limit mailbox commands.
>> */
>> -#define PL_WRITE_MBX_TIMEOUT_MS (1)
>> +#define PL_MBX_TIMEOUT_MS (10)
>> /* Index of memory controller in READ_THERMAL_DATA output */
>> #define TEMP_INDEX_MCTRL 2
>> @@ -199,11 +199,12 @@ static int
>> xe_hwmon_pcode_read_power_limit(const struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 att
>> u32 val0 = 0, val1 = 0;
>> int ret = 0;
>> - ret = xe_pcode_read(root_tile, PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_POWER_SETUP,
>> - (channel == CHANNEL_CARD) ?
>> - READ_PSYSGPU_POWER_LIMIT :
>> - READ_PACKAGE_POWER_LIMIT,
>> - prepare_power_limit_param2(hwmon)), &val0,
>> &val1);
>> + ret = xe_pcode_read_timeout(root_tile,
>> PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_POWER_SETUP,
>> + (channel == CHANNEL_CARD) ?
>> + READ_PSYSGPU_POWER_LIMIT :
>> + READ_PACKAGE_POWER_LIMIT,
>> + prepare_power_limit_param2(hwmon)),
>> + &val0, &val1, PL_MBX_TIMEOUT_MS);
>> if (ret) {
>> drm_dbg(&hwmon->xe->drm, "read failed ch %d val0 0x%08x,
>> val1 0x%08x, ret %d\n",
>> @@ -232,11 +233,12 @@ static int xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit(const
>> struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr
>> u32 val0 = 0, val1 = 0;
>> int ret = 0;
>> - ret = xe_pcode_read(root_tile, PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_POWER_SETUP,
>> - (channel == CHANNEL_CARD) ?
>> - READ_PSYSGPU_POWER_LIMIT :
>> - READ_PACKAGE_POWER_LIMIT,
>> - prepare_power_limit_param2(hwmon)), &val0,
>> &val1);
>> + ret = xe_pcode_read_timeout(root_tile,
>> PCODE_MBOX(PCODE_POWER_SETUP,
>> + (channel == CHANNEL_CARD) ?
>> + READ_PSYSGPU_POWER_LIMIT :
>> + READ_PACKAGE_POWER_LIMIT,
>> + prepare_power_limit_param2(hwmon)),
>> + &val0, &val1, PL_MBX_TIMEOUT_MS);
>> if (ret)
>> drm_dbg(&hwmon->xe->drm, "read failed ch %d val0 0x%08x,
>> val1 0x%08x, ret %d\n",
>> channel, val0, val1, ret);
>> @@ -252,7 +254,7 @@ static int xe_hwmon_pcode_rmw_power_limit(const
>> struct xe_hwmon *hwmon, u32 attr
>> (channel == CHANNEL_CARD) ?
>> WRITE_PSYSGPU_POWER_LIMIT :
>> WRITE_PACKAGE_POWER_LIMIT, 0),
>> - val0, val1, PL_WRITE_MBX_TIMEOUT_MS);
>> + val0, val1, PL_MBX_TIMEOUT_MS);
>> if (ret)
>> drm_dbg(&hwmon->xe->drm, "write failed ch %d val0 0x%08x,
>> val1 0x%08x, ret %d\n",
>> channel, val0, val1, ret);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 17:15 [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe: Increase timeout for hwmon power limit mailbox operations Karthik Poosa
2026-07-29 17:14 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-07-29 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe/pcode: Introduce xe_pcode_read_timeout() API Karthik Poosa
2026-08-31 5:32 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-08-31 6:50 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-07-29 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe/hwmon: Increase timeout for mailbox power limits Karthik Poosa
2026-08-31 5:29 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-08-31 6:54 ` Poosa, Karthik [this message]
2026-08-31 7:09 ` Tauro, Riana
2026-08-31 7:41 ` Raag Jadav
2026-08-31 13:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-31 16:27 ` Poosa, Karthik
2026-08-31 16:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-31 13:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-07-29 18:07 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for drm/xe: Increase timeout for hwmon power limit mailbox operations Patchwork
2026-07-29 22:58 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c61329e-a7d0-4524-b585-5d10fd970ffe@intel.com \
--to=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
--cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox