From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Brost, Matthew" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com"
<thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/vram: add early VRAM health check
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 10:57:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39308cce-1453-45aa-af14-81b78d761cce@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ff9049355a51ec4aeb1e1510a91adbf76ebea26.camel@intel.com>
On 02/09/2026 21:34, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> On Tue, 2026-09-01 at 09:33 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>> On 28/08/2026 17:37, Summers, Stuart wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2026-08-28 at 16:14 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>>> During early probe, use the last page as a canary for BAR sizing,
>>>> CCS
>>>> sizing, identity map setup etc. If something is wrong the last
>>>> page
>>>> is
>>>> where we will likely find it. Hit it with everything we have. For
>>>> now
>>>
>>> Sorry coming in a little late here... but why only the last page
>>> and
>>> not implementing a full per byte/bit memory test to trigger any
>>> potential memory scanning on bit errors? Or is this not the intent
>>> here?
>>
>> Current scope was just to catch obvious sizing errors, which will
>> likely
>> show up in the last page (BAR, CCS, identity map). In particular this
>> was meant as a regression test for the bug Linus hit, where we had
>> incorrect VRAM/CCS sizing.
>>
>> Also, this is hopefully non-destructive, since it gets triggered in
>> CI
>> on probe. Also means it needs to be fast. We could extend this in the
>> future as needed.
>
> Ok yeah makes sense. Basically we're just trying to make sure the
> driver does the right thing here - this isn't about hardware
> validation.
>
> I'm thinking it would be interesting to have something like what we're
> doing in i915 in intel_memory_region_memtest(). This is more about
> hardware validation though so I agree maybe out of scope here.
Yeah, that is something we could explore.
>
> Is there a reason we didn't do this in kunit or part of the mm/memtest?
Not sure how we could do this in mm/memtest? AFAICT that is more for low
level CPU access to some memory range. For something like the CCS bug,
you would not find it with that. Writing to the CCS portion using the
CPU looks normal, so not sure how you would detect it with that alone.
We need working GPU submission so we can trigger something like
XY_CTRL_SURF_COPY_BLT. I think the only way to detect the CCS issue is
to have the GPU interact with the CCS in some way. But at this point we
also can't just globber everything in VRAM without killing the machine.
For kunit, if there is way to inject that into the probe sequence (post
migration layer) then that might work. But also we need to reserve the
last page as a separate step much earlier in the probe sequence, to stop
something stealing it, and then release it after the test part. Probe
should also fail if we detect an issue. Would that be a good fit for kunit?
>
> Anyway not a blocker for what you have here. For the flat ccs and BAR
> pieces I agree this will work.
>
> Thanks,
> Stuart
>
>>
>>>
>>> If this is a production scenario, the last page makes sense, but if
>>> we're already wrapping this in a debug config...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stuart
>>>
>>>> this is gated behind a debug config option, so shouldn't trigger
>>>> on
>>>> production.
>>>>
>>>> Main motivation is around CCS sizing where on some BMG cards the
>>>> CCS
>>>> offset is programmed misaligned, for whatever reason, and our
>>>> handling
>>>> of that was busted, as found by Linus, leading to some amount of
>>>> CCS
>>>> storage getting pulled into the allocator as normal VRAM.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing in our CI farm has such a misaligned offset it would
>>>> seem,
>>>> however I did get this to pop on my b570, which does also have
>>>> the
>>>> misaligned CCS offset:
>>>>
>>>> Tile 0: Running VRAM memtest...
>>>> Tile 0: VRAM bounds overlap CCS region! VRAM sizing is
>>>> incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> With the fix from Linus, this goes away:
>>>>
>>>> Tile 0: Running VRAM memtest...
>>>> Tile 0: VRAM memtest completed.
>>>>
>>>> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview
>>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>>>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 8 +
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 64 ++++++++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.h | 6 +
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_types.h | 4 +
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c | 241
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.h | 10 ++
>>>> 6 files changed, 333 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>>> index 82e0a555fa69..80008bf5776c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>>>> @@ -1051,6 +1051,10 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>>>> if (err)
>>>> return err;
>>>>
>>>> + err = xe_vram_reserve_memtest_bo(xe);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + return err;
>>>> +
>>>> for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
>>>> err = xe_tile_init(tile);
>>>> if (err)
>>>> @@ -1067,6 +1071,10 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
>>>> return err;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + err = xe_vram_memtest(xe);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + return err;
>>>> +
>>>> err = xe_pagefault_init(xe);
>>>> if (err)
>>>> return err;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
>>>> index 0bf000d7c901..ff45c24d8889 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
>>>> @@ -2650,3 +2650,67 @@ void xe_migrate_job_lock_assert(struct
>>>> xe_exec_queue *q)
>>>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_KUNIT_TEST)
>>>> #include "tests/xe_migrate.c"
>>>> #endif
>>>> +
>>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG_MEM)
>>>> +int xe_migrate_debug_ccs_overlap(struct xe_migrate *m,
>>>> + struct xe_bo *scratch_bo,
>>>> + bool write_to_ccs)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(m->tile);
>>>> + struct xe_gt *gt = m->tile->primary_gt;
>>>> + struct dma_fence *fence;
>>>> + struct xe_bb *bb;
>>>> + struct xe_sched_job *job;
>>>> + u64 first_page_dpa, clear_L0_ofs, scratch_dpa,
>>>> scratch_L0_ofs;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!xe_device_has_flat_ccs(xe))
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + first_page_dpa = xe_vram_region_dpa_base(m->tile-
>>>>> mem.vram);
>>>> + clear_L0_ofs = xe_migrate_vram_ofs(xe, first_page_dpa,
>>>> true);
>>>> +
>>>> + scratch_dpa = xe_bo_addr(scratch_bo, 0, XE_PAGE_SIZE);
>>>> + scratch_L0_ofs = xe_migrate_vram_ofs(xe, scratch_dpa,
>>>> false);
>>>> +
>>>> + bb = xe_bb_new(gt, EMIT_COPY_CCS_DW + 1, xe-
>>>>> info.has_usm);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(bb)) {
>>>> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Failed to create bb for VRAM
>>>> overlap check\n");
>>>> + return PTR_ERR(bb);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* 4MB payload = 8KB CCS metadata */
>>>> + if (write_to_ccs) {
>>>> + emit_copy_ccs(gt, bb, clear_L0_ofs, true,
>>>> + scratch_L0_ofs, false, SZ_4M);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + emit_copy_ccs(gt, bb, scratch_L0_ofs, false,
>>>> + clear_L0_ofs, true, SZ_4M);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
>>>> +
>>>> + job = xe_bb_create_migration_job(m->q, bb,
>>>> + xe_migrate_batch_base(m,
>>>> xe-
>>>>> info.has_usm),
>>>> + 0);
>>>> + if (!IS_ERR(job)) {
>>>> + xe_sched_job_add_migrate_flush(job,
>>>> MI_FLUSH_DW_CCS);
>>>> +
>>>> + mutex_lock(&m->job_mutex);
>>>> + xe_sched_job_arm(job);
>>>> +
>>>> + fence = dma_fence_get(&job->drm.s_fence-
>>>>> finished);
>>>> + xe_sched_job_push(job);
>>>> + mutex_unlock(&m->job_mutex);
>>>> +
>>>> + dma_fence_wait(fence, false);
>>>> + dma_fence_put(fence);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Failed to create job for VRAM
>>>> overlap check\n");
>>>> + xe_bb_free(bb, NULL);
>>>> + return PTR_ERR(job);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + xe_bb_free(bb, NULL);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +#endif
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.h
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.h
>>>> index c3a268b01768..a9acc62f78f0 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.h
>>>> @@ -182,4 +182,10 @@ static inline void
>>>> xe_migrate_job_lock_assert(struct xe_exec_queue *q)
>>>> void xe_migrate_job_lock(struct xe_migrate *m, struct
>>>> xe_exec_queue
>>>> *q);
>>>> void xe_migrate_job_unlock(struct xe_migrate *m, struct
>>>> xe_exec_queue *q);
>>>>
>>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG_MEM)
>>>> +int xe_migrate_debug_ccs_overlap(struct xe_migrate *m,
>>>> + struct xe_bo *scratch_bo,
>>>> + bool write_to_ccs);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> #endif
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_types.h
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_types.h
>>>> index 0048100ccb72..e1368c04846a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_types.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_types.h
>>>> @@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ struct xe_tile {
>>>> * Only main GT has page reclaim list
>>>> allocations.
>>>> */
>>>> struct xe_sa_manager *reclaim_pool;
>>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG_MEM)
>>>> + /** @mem.memtest_bo: VRAM overlap check BO */
>>>> + struct xe_bo *memtest_bo;
>>>> +#endif
>>>> } mem;
>>>>
>>>> /** @sriov: tile level virtualization data */
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
>>>> index 0a2f1ab8416e..4a79580c5315 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.c
>>>> @@ -17,8 +17,11 @@
>>>> #include "xe_device.h"
>>>> #include "xe_force_wake.h"
>>>> #include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
>>>> +#include "xe_map.h"
>>>> +#include "xe_migrate.h"
>>>> #include "xe_mmio.h"
>>>> #include "xe_sriov.h"
>>>> +#include "xe_tile.h"
>>>> #include "xe_tile_sriov_vf.h"
>>>> #include "xe_ttm_vram_mgr.h"
>>>> #include "xe_vram.h"
>>>> @@ -403,3 +406,241 @@ resource_size_t
>>>> xe_vram_region_actual_physical_size(const struct xe_vram_region
>>>> return vram ? vram->actual_physical_size : 0;
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_vram_region_actual_physical_size);
>>>> +
>>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG_MEM)
>>>> +static void memtest_bo_cleanup(void *arg)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct xe_device *xe = arg;
>>>> +
>>>> + xe_vram_free_memtest_bos(xe);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +int xe_vram_reserve_memtest_bo(struct xe_device *xe)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct xe_tile *tile;
>>>> + u8 id;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
>>>> + u64 vram_size;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!tile->mem.vram)
>>>> + continue;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (tile->mem.vram->io_size < tile->mem.vram-
>>>>> usable_size) {
>>>> + drm_info(&xe->drm,
>>>> + "Tile %d: Small-BAR system
>>>> detected,
>>>> skipping VRAM memtest\n",
>>>> + id);
>>>> + continue;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + vram_size = tile->mem.vram->usable_size;
>>>> +
>>>> + tile->mem.memtest_bo =
>>>> xe_bo_create_pin_map_at_novm(xe, tile, SZ_64K,
>>>> +
>>>> vram_size - SZ_64K,
>>>> +
>>>> ttm_bo_type_kernel,
>>>> +
>>>> XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM_IF_DGFX(tile),
>>>> +
>>>> 0, false);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(tile->mem.memtest_bo)) {
>>>> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Tile %d: Failed to
>>>> reserve memtest BO\n", id);
>>>> + tile->mem.memtest_bo = NULL;
>>>> + continue;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + drm_info(&xe->drm, "Tile %d: Reserved memtest BO
>>>> at
>>>> offset 0x%llx\n",
>>>> + id, vram_size - SZ_64K);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(xe->drm.dev,
>>>> memtest_bo_cleanup, xe);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void xe_vram_free_memtest_bos(struct xe_device *xe)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct xe_tile *tile;
>>>> + u8 id;
>>>> +
>>>> + for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
>>>> + if (tile->mem.memtest_bo) {
>>>> + xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm(tile-
>>>>> mem.memtest_bo);
>>>> + tile->mem.memtest_bo = NULL;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +int xe_vram_memtest(struct xe_device *xe)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct xe_tile *tile;
>>>> + u8 id;
>>>> + int err = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
>>>> + struct xe_bo *last_page_bo = tile-
>>>>> mem.memtest_bo;
>>>> + struct dma_fence *fence;
>>>> + bool overlap = false;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> + u8 val;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!last_page_bo || !tile->migrate)
>>>> + continue;
>>>> +
>>>> + drm_info(&xe->drm, "Tile %d: Running VRAM
>>>> memtest...\n", id);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* CPU write and readback first and last byte of
>>>> the
>>>> last page */
>>>> + xe_map_wr(xe, &last_page_bo->vmap, 0, u8, 0xA5);
>>>> + xe_map_wr(xe, &last_page_bo->vmap, SZ_64K - 1,
>>>> u8,
>>>> 0x5A);
>>>> +
>>>> + val = xe_map_rd(xe, &last_page_bo->vmap, 0, u8);
>>>> + if (drm_WARN(&xe->drm, val != 0xA5,
>>>> + "Tile %d: CPU memtest failed at
>>>> offset 0
>>>> (expected 0xA5, got 0x%02x)\n",
>>>> + id, val)) {
>>>> + err = -EIO;
>>>> + goto unpin;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + val = xe_map_rd(xe, &last_page_bo->vmap, SZ_64K -
>>>> 1,
>>>> u8);
>>>> + if (drm_WARN(&xe->drm, val != 0x5A,
>>>> + "Tile %d: CPU memtest failed at
>>>> offset
>>>> 65535 (expected 0x5A, got 0x%02x)\n",
>>>> + id, val)) {
>>>> + err = -EIO;
>>>> + goto unpin;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Non-CCS access via GPU on the last page */
>>>> + xe_bo_lock(last_page_bo, false);
>>>> + fence = xe_migrate_clear(tile->migrate,
>>>> last_page_bo,
>>>> + last_page_bo-
>>>>> ttm.resource,
>>>> +
>>>> XE_MIGRATE_CLEAR_FLAG_BO_DATA);
>>>> + xe_bo_unlock(last_page_bo);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!IS_ERR(fence)) {
>>>> + dma_fence_wait(fence, false);
>>>> + dma_fence_put(fence);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + err = PTR_ERR(fence);
>>>> + goto unpin;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + val = xe_map_rd(xe, &last_page_bo->vmap, 0, u8);
>>>> + if (drm_WARN(&xe->drm, val != 0x00,
>>>> + "Tile %d: GPU memtest clear failed
>>>> at
>>>> offset 0 (expected 0x00, got 0x%02x)\n",
>>>> + id, val)) {
>>>> + err = -EIO;
>>>> + goto unpin;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Check for CCS overlap on the root tile.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * TODO: maybe extend if we ever get multi-tile +
>>>> CCS. Pay
>>>> + * special attention to the l2 flush below.
>>>> Currently
>>>> that is
>>>> + * hard coded to the root tile.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (!id && xe_device_has_flat_ccs(xe) &&
>>>> + GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 2000) {
>>>> + struct xe_bo *scratch_bo_before;
>>>> + struct xe_bo *scratch_bo_after;
>>>> +
>>>> + scratch_bo_before =
>>>> xe_bo_create_pin_map_novm(xe, tile, SZ_64K,
>>>> +
>>>> ttm_bo_type_kernel,
>>>> +
>>>> XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM_IF_DGFX(tile),
>>>> +
>>>> false);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(scratch_bo_before)) {
>>>> + err = PTR_ERR(scratch_bo_before);
>>>> + goto unpin;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + scratch_bo_after =
>>>> xe_bo_create_pin_map_novm(xe, tile, SZ_64K,
>>>> +
>>>> ttm_bo_type_kernel,
>>>> +
>>>> XE_BO_FLAG_VRAM_IF_DGFX(tile),
>>>> +
>>>> false);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(scratch_bo_after)) {
>>>> + xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm(scratch_bo_
>>>> befo
>>>> re);
>>>> + err = PTR_ERR(scratch_bo_after);
>>>> + goto unpin;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Save original CCS metadata for PA 0 +
>>>> */
>>>> + err = xe_migrate_debug_ccs_overlap(tile-
>>>>> migrate, scratch_bo_before, false);
>>>> + if (err) {
>>>> + xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm(scratch_bo_
>>>> befo
>>>> re);
>>>> + xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm(scratch_bo_
>>>> afte
>>>> r);
>>>> + goto unpin;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Fill last page. If there is CCS
>>>> overlap in
>>>> the last
>>>> + * page this will snag the raw CCS
>>>> storage.
>>>> + */
>>>> + xe_map_memset(xe, &last_page_bo->vmap, 0,
>>>> 0x5A, SZ_64K);
>>>> + xe_device_wmb(xe);
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Global invalidation. Some BMG SKUs
>>>> will
>>>> cache the BAR
>>>> + * writes in the GPU side VRAM cache.
>>>> Make
>>>> sure above
>>>> + * writes are fully flushed out to VRAM,
>>>> so
>>>> this is
>>>> + * hopefully more well behaved with the
>>>> CCS
>>>> unit, if
>>>> + * there is indeed CCS overlap with
>>>> normal
>>>> VRAM. Since
>>>> + * there is a separate CCS cache, the CCS
>>>> unit might not
>>>> + * respect the GPU VRAM cache for CCS
>>>> accesses, so opt
>>>> + * for being super careful here.
>>>> + */
>>>> + xe_device_l2_flush(xe, true);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Use GPU to clear CCS state for PA 0 */
>>>> + xe_map_memset(xe, &scratch_bo_after-
>>>>> vmap, 0,
>>>> 0x00, SZ_64K);
>>>> + err = xe_migrate_debug_ccs_overlap(tile-
>>>>> migrate, scratch_bo_after, true);
>>>> + if (err) {
>>>> + xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm(scratch_bo_
>>>> befo
>>>> re);
>>>> + xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm(scratch_bo_
>>>> afte
>>>> r);
>>>> + goto unpin;
>>>> + }
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Global invalidation. Ensure CCS caches
>>>> really are
>>>> + * nuked and the raw CCS data is visible
>>>> in
>>>> VRAM, for
>>>> + * the below access.
>>>> + */
>>>> + xe_device_l2_flush(xe, true);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Check if last_page_bo was corrupted by
>>>> the
>>>> GPU CCS clear */
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < SZ_64K; i += 8) {
>>>> + u64 payload = xe_map_rd(xe,
>>>> &last_page_bo->vmap, i, u64);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (payload !=
>>>> 0x5A5A5A5A5A5A5A5AULL)
>>>> {
>>>> + overlap = true;
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Restore original CCS metadata for PA 0
>>>> +
>>>> */
>>>> + err = xe_migrate_debug_ccs_overlap(tile-
>>>>> migrate, scratch_bo_before, true);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "Failed to
>>>> restore
>>>> CCS metadata\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm(scratch_bo_before);
>>>> + xe_bo_unpin_map_no_vm(scratch_bo_after);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (drm_WARN(&xe->drm, overlap,
>>>> + "Tile %d: VRAM bounds overlap CCS
>>>> region! VRAM sizing is incorrect.\n",
>>>> + id)) {
>>>> + err = -EINVAL;
>>>> + goto unpin;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + drm_info(&xe->drm, "Tile %d: VRAM memtest
>>>> completed.\n", id);
>>>> +
>>>> +unpin:
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + xe_vram_free_memtest_bos(xe);
>>>> +
>>>> + return err;
>>>> +}
>>>> +#endif
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.h
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.h
>>>> index dd1c8bf17922..38425d81f777 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vram.h
>>>> @@ -23,4 +23,14 @@ resource_size_t xe_vram_region_dpa_base(const
>>>> struct xe_vram_region *vram);
>>>> resource_size_t xe_vram_region_usable_size(const struct
>>>> xe_vram_region *vram);
>>>> resource_size_t xe_vram_region_actual_physical_size(const
>>>> struct
>>>> xe_vram_region *vram);
>>>>
>>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG_MEM)
>>>> +int xe_vram_reserve_memtest_bo(struct xe_device *xe);
>>>> +void xe_vram_free_memtest_bos(struct xe_device *xe);
>>>> +int xe_vram_memtest(struct xe_device *xe);
>>>> +#else
>>>> +static inline int xe_vram_reserve_memtest_bo(struct xe_device
>>>> *xe) {
>>>> return 0; }
>>>> +static inline void xe_vram_free_memtest_bos(struct xe_device
>>>> *xe) {}
>>>> +static inline int xe_vram_memtest(struct xe_device *xe) { return
>>>> 0;
>>>> }
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> #endif
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 15:14 [PATCH 0/5] VRAM health check + CCS fix Matthew Auld
2026-08-28 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe/migrate: support 4K PTEs for identity map Matthew Auld
2026-08-28 19:46 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-01 8:48 ` Matthew Auld
2026-09-01 20:07 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-28 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe: Don't hand out the flat CCS storage as usable VRAM Matthew Auld
2026-08-28 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe/vram: report FLAT_CCS base misalignment Matthew Auld
2026-08-28 20:10 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-01 8:23 ` Matthew Auld
2026-09-01 20:10 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-28 15:14 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe: add force option for global invalidation Matthew Auld
2026-09-01 20:29 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-28 15:14 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe/vram: add early VRAM health check Matthew Auld
2026-08-28 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-08-28 19:58 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-28 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-08-31 20:50 ` Matthew Brost
2026-08-28 16:37 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-09-01 8:33 ` Matthew Auld
2026-09-02 7:45 ` Matthew Brost
2026-09-02 20:34 ` Summers, Stuart
2026-09-03 9:57 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-08-28 15:21 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for VRAM health check + CCS fix Patchwork
2026-08-28 15:58 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-28 17:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39308cce-1453-45aa-af14-81b78d761cce@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox