Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/xe/guc: Add LFD format output for guc log

[Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>]

On 03.04.2025 17:20, Dong, Zhanjun wrote:
> Please see my inline comments below.
> 
> Regards,
> Zhanjun Dong
> 
> On 2025-03-27 11:39 p.m., Matthew Brost wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 04:40:27PM -0700, Zhanjun Dong wrote:
>>> Add new debugfs entry "guc_log_lfd", which supports output guc log
>>> in LFD(Log Format Descriptors) format.
>>>
>>
>> Not a full review - but couple of drive by comments.
>>

...

>>> +
>>> +/** Log Init Config KLV IDs. */
>>> +enum guc_log_lic_type_t {
>>
>> '_t' suffix isn't used in the Xe style as typically is used for typedefs
>> which are frowned upon in upstream Linux. I'd drop "_t" suffix
>> everywhere.
> 
> I agree _t is not Xe style, while for this case, the ABI header file is
> follows with GuC spec, which is a cross system/project thing. The name
> here is the secondary defines.
> I guess simply follows orginal spec will make things more easy to
> compare and reduce possible mismatches among systems.
> 

I was also requesting to drop the _t suffix, so it's not just Matt voice

also please note that the raw GuC spec is not based on some solid ISO
standard that we should use as a role model, so blindly following what
was written there is not exactly the right choice

and while comparing spec you can easily drop _t suffix (that shouldn't
be there in first place)