Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Mallesh Koujalagi <mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
	Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>,
	Yoni Levitt <yoni.levitt@intel.com>,
	"Aravind Iddamsetty" <aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com>,
	Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/32] drm/xe/log: Add structured SIGID error logging infrastructure
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 22:38:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7991e3b1-bd3c-459e-b033-29e27e8a4cb0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f617645d-69c6-4fa0-8176-1837b982ab7a@intel.com>



On 8/13/2026 3:42 PM, Nilawar, Badal wrote:
> Hi Michal,

...

> 
> From kunit example I got this output for hardware errors.
> drm-kunit-mock-device demo_dmesg.drm-kunit-mock-device: [drm] *ERROR* SIGID=204 (0102030405060708090a0b0c) [Hardware Error]: testing HARDWARE signature
> drm-kunit-mock-device demo_dmesg.drm-kunit-mock-device: [drm] *ERROR* SIGID=202 CORRECTED (0102030405060708090a0b0c) [Hardware Error]: Tile1: testing HARDWARE signature
> 
> SIGIDs 202 and 204 correspond to the XE_RAS_COMP_DEVICE_MEMORY and XE_RAS_COMP_FABRIC components returned by firmware via xe_ras_error_class.
> If we want the component name to be included in the error message, what should be passed to the logging helper? The current KUnit test uses XE_LOG_COMPONENT_NONE, so no component information is being emitted.

if you want HW component name to be explicitly included like
we do for SW errors, use xe_log_comp_xxx() macros:

-       xe_log_emit_recoverable(pdev, XE_SIGID_FABRIC,
-                               XE_LOG_COMPONENT_NONE, XE_LOG_LOCATION_NONE,
+       xe_log_comp_recoverable(pdev, FABRIC,
                                blob, sizeof(blob), "testing %s signature\n", "HARDWARE");
-       xe_log_from_corrected(tile, XE_SIGID_DEVICE_MEMORY, XE_LOG_COMPONENT_NONE,
+       xe_log_comp_corrected(tile, DEVICE_MEMORY,
                              blob, sizeof(blob), "testing %s signature\n", "HARDWARE");

then you will get:

.. [drm] *ERROR* SIGID=204 (0102030405060708090a0b0c) [Hardware Error]: FABRIC: testing HARDWARE signature
.. [drm] *ERROR* SIGID=202 CORRECTED (0102030405060708090a0b0c) [Hardware Error]: Tile1: DEVICE_MEMORY: testing HARDWARE signature


and btw, I will ask again, whether we want LOCATION/COMPONENT
decoration as here:

	Tile1: GT1: PROBE: testing software signature
	Tile1: DEVICE_MEMORY: testing HARDWARE signature

or maybe in COMPONENT/LOCATION order:

	PROBE: Tile1: GT1: testing software signature
	DEVICE_MEMORY: Tile1: testing HARDWARE signature

if latter, then please comment patch 4/32

> 
> Thanks,
> Badal
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-13 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12 19:14 [PATCH v4 00/32] drm/xe: Add structured SIGID error logging infrastructure Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 01/32] drm/xe: Introduce xe_any helpers Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 16:51   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 02/32] drm/xe/log: Add structured SIGID error logging infrastructure Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 13:33   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-13 13:57     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 13:42   ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-08-13 19:00     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-13 20:38     ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2026-08-13 18:51   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 03/32] drm/xe/log: Introduce structured component/location identifiers Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 17:20   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 04/32] drm/xe/log: Add component/location decorations to dmesg Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 05/32] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for severity Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 06/32] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for location Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 07/32] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for location & severity Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 08/32] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for components Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 09/32] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for component & severity Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13  4:38   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 10/32] drm/xe/log: Add SIGID log helpers for errno-only Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 11/32] drm/xe/log: Index all SIGID printk messages Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 12:31   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-13 12:54     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 13:29       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 12/32] drm/xe/log: Add hardware error signatures Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13  5:03   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 13/32] drm/xe/log: Extend components list with hardware items Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 14/32] drm/xe/ras: Check RAS and LOG component definitions Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 15/32] drm/xe/kunit: Setup driver data in the test device Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 16/32] drm/xe/tests: Add Kunit tests for xe_log Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 17/32] drm/xe/tests: Add kunit tests for xe_any Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 18/32] drm/xe: Report 'probe blocked' error using SIGID Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13  6:26   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 19/32] drm/xe: Report all probe errors " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13  6:50   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-13  9:12     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13  9:58       ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-13 10:09         ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 20/32] drm/xe/survivability: Report 'boot status' " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13  8:38   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-13  9:28     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 10:07       ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-13 10:18         ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 21/32] drm/xe/survivability: Report 'sysfs failure' error " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13  8:54   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 22/32] drm/xe/survivability: Report 'Boot Mode enabled' status " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 10:52   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-13 11:01     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 23/32] drm/xe/survivability: Report 'Runtime " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 11:40   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-13 12:46     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 13:16       ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 24/32] drm/xe: Report 'device wedged' errors " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 22:28   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-13 11:56   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 25/32] drm/xe/pcode: Report 'Mailbox failed' error " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 12:10   ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-08-13 12:35     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 26/32] drm/xe/pcode: Report 'timeout, retrying' " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 16:46   ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2026-08-13 18:42     ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 27/32] drm/xe/pcode: Report 'initialization timedout' " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13 18:40   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 28/32] drm/xe/guc: Report 'GuC mmio' errors " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 29/32] drm/xe/gt: Report 'reset failed' " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 30/32] drm/xe/gt: Report 'Fault response' pagefault error " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 18:37   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-13 19:46     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 31/32] drm/xe/gt: Report 'Queue full' " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 17:25   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-12 19:14 ` [PATCH v4 32/32] drm/xe/pci: Report 'cannot re-enable' " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-08-13 17:21   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-08-12 19:22 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add structured SIGID error logging infrastructure (rev4) Patchwork
2026-08-12 19:24 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-08-12 20:34 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-08-13  2:47 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7991e3b1-bd3c-459e-b033-29e27e8a4cb0@intel.com \
    --to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
    --cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    --cc=yoni.levitt@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox