From: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
To: "Belgaumkar, Vinay" <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add forcewake status to powergate_info
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 12:08:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a7b4693-8a28-423c-bbbb-8b16b4ee2de7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c07e167c-33cf-4497-8a31-e88c5a0414a8@intel.com>
On 30-01-2026 23:04, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
> On 1/30/2026 7:20 AM, Nilawar, Badal wrote:
>>
>> On 16-01-2026 04:10, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>>> Dump forcewake status and ref counts for all domains as part
>>> of this debugfs. This is the sample output from gt1-
>>>
>>> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri//0/gt1/powergate_info
>>> Media Power Gating Enabled: yes
>>> Media Slice0 Power Gate Status: down
>>> GSC Power Gate Status: down
>>> GT.ref_count=0, GT.forcewake=0x10000
>>> VDBox0.ref_count=0, VDBox0.forcewake=0x10000
>>> VEBox0.ref_count=0, VEBox0.forcewake=0x10000
>>> GSC.ref_count=0, GSC.forcewake=0x10000
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar<vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 46
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h | 11 +++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c | 20 +++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>>> index 76e054f314ee..197e2197bd0a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
>>> @@ -148,12 +148,6 @@ static int domain_sleep_wait(struct xe_gt *gt,
>>> return __domain_wait(gt, domain, false);
>>> }
>>> -#define for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain__, mask__, fw__, tmp__) \
>>> - for (tmp__ = (mask__); tmp__; tmp__ &= ~BIT(ffs(tmp__) - 1)) \
>>> - for_each_if((domain__ = ((fw__)->domains + \
>>> - (ffs(tmp__) - 1))) && \
>>> - domain__->reg_ctl.addr)
>>> -
>>> /**
>>> * xe_force_wake_get() : Increase the domain refcount
>>> * @fw: struct xe_force_wake
>>> @@ -266,3 +260,43 @@ void xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake
>>> *fw, unsigned int fw_ref)
>>> xe_gt_WARN(gt, ack_fail, "Forcewake domain%s %#x failed to
>>> acknowledge sleep request\n",
>>> str_plural(hweight_long(ack_fail)), ack_fail);
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +const char *xe_force_wake_domain_to_str(enum
>>> xe_force_wake_domain_id id)
>>> +{
>>> + switch (id) {
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT:
>>> + return "GT";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER:
>>> + return "Render";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA:
>>> + return "Media";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0:
>>> + return "VDBox0";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX1:
>>> + return "VDBox1";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX2:
>>> + return "VDBox2";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX3:
>>> + return "VDBox3";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX4:
>>> + return "VDBox4";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX5:
>>> + return "VDBox5";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX6:
>>> + return "VDBox6";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX7:
>>> + return "VDBox7";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0:
>>> + return "VEBox0";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX1:
>>> + return "VEBox1";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX2:
>>> + return "VEBox2";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX3:
>>> + return "VEBox3";
>>> + case XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC:
>>> + return "GSC";
>>
>> How about creating static look up table.
>>
>> static const char * const domain_names[] = {
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT] = "GT",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER] = "Render",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA] = "Media",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX0] = "VDBox0",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX1] = "VDBox1",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX2] = "VDBox2",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX3] = "VDBox3",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX4] = "VDBox4",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX5] = "VDBox5",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX6] = "VDBox6",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VDBOX7] = "VDBox7",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX0] = "VEBox0",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX1] = "VEBox1",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX2] = "VEBox2",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_MEDIA_VEBOX3] = "VEBox3",
>> [XE_FW_DOMAIN_ID_GSC] = "GSC",
>> };
>>
>> if (id < ARRAY_SIZE(domain_names) && domain_names[id])
>> return domain_names[id];
>
> I was trying to make it a little more dynamic where, if something
> changes in the FW table, we don't need to update 2 locations.
Ok, but even with a switch-case statement, you’d still need to update it
whenever a new enum value is added.
So, updates in two places can’t be completely avoided.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vinay.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Badal
>>
>>> + default:
>>> + return "Unknown";
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>>> index 1e2198f6a007..f7690cb34ef7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.h
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,17 @@ unsigned int __must_check
>>> xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>> enum xe_force_wake_domains domains);
>>> void xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw, unsigned int
>>> fw_ref);
>>> +const char *xe_force_wake_domain_to_str(enum
>>> xe_force_wake_domain_id id);
>>> +
>>> +#define for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain__, mask__, fw__, tmp__) \
>>> + for (tmp__ = (mask__); tmp__; tmp__ &= ~BIT(ffs(tmp__) - 1)) \
>>> + for_each_if((domain__ = ((fw__)->domains + \
>>> + (ffs(tmp__) - 1))) && \
>>> + domain__->reg_ctl.addr)
>>> +
>>> +#define for_each_fw_domain(domain__, fw__, tmp__) \
>>> + for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain__, fw__->initialized_domains,
>>> fw__, tmp__)
>>> +
>>> static inline int
>>> xe_force_wake_ref(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
>>> enum xe_force_wake_domains domain)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c
>>> index 52436dcb6381..8e36202f1a4f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_idle.c
>>> @@ -169,6 +169,24 @@ void xe_gt_idle_disable_pg(struct xe_gt *gt)
>>> xe_mmio_write32(>->mmio, POWERGATE_ENABLE,
>>> gtidle->powergate_enable);
>>> }
>>> +static void force_wake_domains_show(struct xe_gt *gt, struct
>>> drm_printer *p)
>>> +{
>>> + struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
>>> + struct xe_force_wake *fw = gt_to_fw(gt);
>>> + unsigned int tmp;
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
>>> + for_each_fw_domain(domain, fw, tmp) {
>>> + drm_printf(p, "%s.ref_count=%u, %s.fwake=0x%x\n",
>>> + xe_force_wake_domain_to_str(domain->id),
>>> + READ_ONCE(domain->ref),
>>> + xe_force_wake_domain_to_str(domain->id),
>>> + xe_mmio_read32(>->mmio, domain->reg_ctl));
>>> + }
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * xe_gt_idle_pg_print - Xe powergating info
>>> * @gt: GT object
>>> @@ -260,6 +278,8 @@ int xe_gt_idle_pg_print(struct xe_gt *gt, struct
>>> drm_printer *p)
>>> str_up_down(pg_status & GSC_AWAKE_STATUS));
>>> }
>>> + force_wake_domains_show(gt, p);
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-15 22:40 [PATCH 0/2] drm/xe: Add more info to powergate_info debugfs Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-01-15 22:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/xe: Add GSC to powergate_info Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-01-30 15:23 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-01-15 22:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/xe: Add forcewake status " Vinay Belgaumkar
2026-01-30 15:20 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-01-30 17:34 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2026-02-02 6:38 ` Nilawar, Badal [this message]
2026-02-02 17:12 ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2026-02-02 17:20 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-02-03 6:07 ` Nilawar, Badal
2026-01-15 22:48 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe: Add more info to powergate_info debugfs Patchwork
2026-01-15 22:50 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-01-15 23:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-01-16 4:34 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a7b4693-8a28-423c-bbbb-8b16b4ee2de7@intel.com \
--to=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox