Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe: Move xe->info.devid|revid initialization
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 14:47:51 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecizido8.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525160529.15890-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>

Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> writes:

> The xe_info_init_early() is a place where we initialize those of
> the xe->info fields that do not require any additional hardware
> probes. Move the initialization of the devid/revid also there, but
> to avoid breaking the kunit helper, which also calls this function,
> keep their initialization separate in sub-function so we can easily
> stub it when running the kunit test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c      | 12 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c         |  2 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c            | 12 ++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
> index 860409c579f8..7c3428ab4c89 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
> @@ -311,6 +311,17 @@ const void *xe_pci_id_gen_param(struct kunit *test, const void *prev, char *desc
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(xe_pci_id_gen_param);
>  
> +static void fake_init_devid(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
> +	struct xe_pci_fake_data *data = test->priv;
> +
> +	if (data) {
> +		xe->info.devid = data->devid;
> +		xe->info.revid = data->revid;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int fake_read_gmdid(struct xe_device *xe, enum xe_gmdid_type type,
>  			   u32 *ver, u32 *revid)
>  {
> @@ -369,6 +380,7 @@ int xe_pci_fake_device_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>  	xe->sriov.__mode = data && data->sriov_mode ?
>  			   data->sriov_mode : XE_SRIOV_MODE_NONE;
>  
> +	kunit_activate_static_stub(test, init_devid, fake_init_devid);
>  	kunit_activate_static_stub(test, read_gmdid, fake_read_gmdid);
>  	kunit_activate_static_stub(test, xe_info_probe_tile_count,
>  				   fake_xe_info_probe_tile_count);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
> index 30505d1cbefc..46f961f75ecd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci_test.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ struct xe_pci_fake_data {
>  	struct xe_step_info step;
>  	u32 graphics_verx100;
>  	u32 media_verx100;
> +	u16 devid;
> +	u8 revid;

Do we need to add those fields?

Looking through the rest of the series, I don't see us using them.  I
think we could just have fake_init_devid() do nothing for now.  We could
come back and add support for having devid and revid values when/if we
need them.

--
Gustavo Sousa

>  };
>  
>  int xe_pci_fake_device_init(struct xe_device *xe);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index cdc7e0935c13..b498147dcf61 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -521,8 +521,6 @@ struct xe_device *xe_device_create(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	if (err)
>  		return ERR_PTR(err);
>  
> -	xe->info.devid = pdev->device;
> -	xe->info.revid = pdev->revision;
>  	xe->atomic_svm_timeslice_ms = 5;
>  	xe->min_run_period_lr_ms = 5;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> index b1f5f0098f26..6b1a4cb7ccb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
> @@ -727,6 +727,16 @@ static int handle_gmdid(struct xe_device *xe,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void init_devid(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xe->drm.dev);
> +
> +	KUNIT_STATIC_STUB_REDIRECT(init_devid, xe);
> +
> +	xe->info.devid = pdev->device;
> +	xe->info.revid = pdev->revision;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Initialize device info content that only depends on static driver_data
>   * passed to the driver at probe time from PCI ID table.
> @@ -742,6 +752,8 @@ static int xe_info_init_early(struct xe_device *xe,
>  	xe->info.subplatform = subplatform_desc ?
>  		subplatform_desc->subplatform : XE_SUBPLATFORM_NONE;
>  
> +	init_devid(xe);
> +
>  	xe->info.dma_mask_size = desc->dma_mask_size;
>  	xe->info.va_bits = desc->va_bits;
>  	xe->info.vm_max_level = desc->vm_max_level;
> -- 
> 2.47.1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-25 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-25 16:05 [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe: Misc initialization improvements Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe: Drop unused param from xe_device_create() Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 18:13   ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-25 18:45   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-25 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Move xe->info.force_execlist initialization Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 18:46   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-25 16:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe: Move xe->info.devid|revid initialization Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 17:47   ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2026-05-25 18:25     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 19:12       ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-25 19:41   ` [PATCH v2 " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 20:01     ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-25 16:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe: Separate early xe_device initialization Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 18:21   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-25 18:57     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 19:05       ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-25 19:00     ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-25 19:14       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 18:22   ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-25 16:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe/pm: Don't access device in init_early() Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 18:30   ` Raag Jadav
2026-05-25 18:47   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-27 15:46   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-05-25 16:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/pm: Do early initialization " Michal Wajdeczko
2026-05-25 18:47   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-05-25 16:36 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Misc initialization improvements Patchwork
2026-05-25 17:42 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-25 19:48 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Misc initialization improvements (rev2) Patchwork
2026-05-25 20:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-05-26  1:59 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ecizido8.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox