Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/14] ASoC/SOF/core: Ensure sof_ops_free() is still called when probe never ran.
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 10:58:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fs2sgmsn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231002193847.7134-3-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, 02 Oct 2023, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>
> In an effort to not call sof_ops_free twice, we stopped running it when
> probe was aborted.
>
> Check the result of cancel_work_sync to see if this was the case.
>
> Fixes: 31bb7bd9ffee ("ASoC: SOF: core: Only call sof_ops_free() on remove if the probe was successful")
> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

IMO this and the subsequent patches need either

- cherry-pick -x annotation for patches that have already been merged to
  upstream trees

or

- Link: tag pointing at the patches on upstream mailing list for patches
  that haven't been merged yet


BR,
Jani.


> ---
>  sound/soc/sof/core.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/core.c b/sound/soc/sof/core.c
> index 2d1616b81485..0938b259f703 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sof/core.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/core.c
> @@ -459,9 +459,10 @@ int snd_sof_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>  	struct snd_sof_dev *sdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct snd_sof_pdata *pdata = sdev->pdata;
>  	int ret;
> +	bool aborted = false;
>  
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_PROBE_WORK_QUEUE))
> -		cancel_work_sync(&sdev->probe_work);
> +		aborted = cancel_work_sync(&sdev->probe_work);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Unregister any registered client device first before IPC and debugfs
> @@ -487,6 +488,9 @@ int snd_sof_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>  		snd_sof_free_debug(sdev);
>  		snd_sof_remove(sdev);
>  		sof_ops_free(sdev);
> +	} else if (aborted) {
> +		/* probe_work never ran */
> +		sof_ops_free(sdev);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* release firmware */

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-03  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-02 19:38 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 01/14] Revert "sound/soc/sof: Remove deferred probe for SOF" maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 02/14] Revert "sound/hda: Allow XE as i915 replacement for sound" maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/14] ASoC/SOF/core: Ensure sof_ops_free() is still called when probe never ran maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-03  7:58   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 04/14] ASoC: SOF: core: Add probe_early and remove_late callbacks maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 05/14] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: start splitting the probe maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 06/14] ALSA: hda/intel: Fix error handling in azx_probe() maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 07/14] ALSA: hda/i915: Allow override of gpu binding maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 08/14] ALSA: hda/i915: Add an allow_modprobe argument to snd_hdac_i915_init maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 09/14] ALSA: hda/i915: Allow xe as match for i915_component_master_match maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 10/14] ASoC: Intel: avs: Move snd_hdac_i915_init to before probe_work maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 11/14] ALSA: hda/intel: " maarten.lankhorst
2023-11-14 11:06   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-14 12:35     ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-14 13:29       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 13:31         ` Saarinen, Jani
2023-11-14 16:52           ` Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 17:24             ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-15  8:15             ` Kai Vehmanen
2023-11-14 13:39       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-14 14:39         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 15:50           ` Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 15:52             ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 15:09     ` Takashi Iwai
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 12/14] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: " maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 13/14] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Move binding to display driver outside of deferred probe maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 14/14] ALSA: hda/i915: Remove extra argument from snd_hdac_i915_init maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 20:28 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for series starting with [01/14] Revert "sound/soc/sof: Remove deferred probe for SOF" Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success " Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:51 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:58 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:59 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-10-03 11:00 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-10-03 11:37 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2023-11-14 16:30 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for series starting with [01/14] Revert "sound/soc/sof: Remove deferred probe for SOF" (rev3) Patchwork
2023-11-15 23:27 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for series starting with [01/14] Revert "sound/soc/sof: Remove deferred probe for SOF" (rev4) Patchwork
2023-11-17 21:33 ` Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-03 12:00 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/14] Update sound patches to upstreamable versions maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-03 12:00 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/14] ASoC/SOF/core: Ensure sof_ops_free() is still called when probe never ran maarten.lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fs2sgmsn.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox