From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
Violet Monti <violet.monti@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] drm/xe: Probe info outside of xe_info_init() and xe_info_init_early()
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 19:13:05 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jyrdyr9q.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609-xe-probe-info-v1-0-21e83e188e60@intel.com>
Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> writes:
> Functions xe_info_init() and xe_info_init_early() are meant to
> initialize fields of xe->info, but they also probe the hardware as
> part of the process. This mixed responsibilities issue makes kunit
> testing need to rely on static stubbing in order to initialize the
> fake device info.
>
> To make the design cleaner, let's do the necessary refactors so that
> those functions don't try to poke the hardware and receive and info
> that needs to be probed as parameters instead. The end result is that
> functions xe_info_init() and xe_info_init_early() become better
> reusable and we have a cleaner tests/xe_pci.c.
>
> This will also be relevant for an upcoming series that is likely to
> attempt to do fake device initialization outside of tests/xe_pci.c.
> Nevertheless, even without it the refactor is arguably good in itself,
> as observed by the end result of tests/xe_pci.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
> ---
> Gustavo Sousa (9):
> drm/xe: Add framework for info probing
> drm/xe/step: Pass xe_step_info to xe_step_*_get() functions
> drm/xe: Add devid and revid to xe_probed_info
> drm/xe/step: Make xe_step_platform_get() independent from xe->info
> drm/xe: Add platform-level step info to xe_probed_info
> drm/xe/tests: Set non-GMDID graphics step in xe_pci_fake_device_init()
> drm/xe: Add graphics/media IPs and their step info to xe_probed_info
> drm/xe: Don't initialize tile_count in xe_info_init_early()
> drm/xe: Add tile_count to xe_probed_info
Applied to drm-xe-next. Thank you all for the reviews and feedback!
--
Gustavo Sousa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 20:17 [PATCH 0/9] drm/xe: Probe info outside of xe_info_init() and xe_info_init_early() Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-09 20:17 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/xe: Add framework for info probing Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-16 18:51 ` Violet Monti
2026-06-16 21:56 ` Matt Roper
2026-06-17 12:43 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-19 17:45 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-06-09 20:17 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/xe/step: Pass xe_step_info to xe_step_*_get() functions Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-16 19:31 ` Violet Monti
2026-06-19 17:47 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-06-09 20:17 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/xe: Add devid and revid to xe_probed_info Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-16 19:33 ` Violet Monti
2026-06-19 17:54 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-06-09 20:17 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/xe/step: Make xe_step_platform_get() independent from xe->info Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-16 19:37 ` Violet Monti
2026-06-09 20:17 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/xe: Add platform-level step info to xe_probed_info Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-16 19:50 ` Violet Monti
2026-06-19 18:01 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-06-09 20:17 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/xe/tests: Set non-GMDID graphics step in xe_pci_fake_device_init() Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-16 19:58 ` Violet Monti
2026-06-19 18:02 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-06-09 20:17 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/xe: Add graphics/media IPs and their step info to xe_probed_info Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-16 20:22 ` Violet Monti
2026-06-19 18:04 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-06-09 20:17 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/xe: Don't initialize tile_count in xe_info_init_early() Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-16 21:07 ` Violet Monti
2026-06-19 18:04 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-06-09 20:17 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xe: Add tile_count to xe_probed_info Gustavo Sousa
2026-06-16 21:16 ` Violet Monti
2026-06-19 18:05 ` Bhadane, Dnyaneshwar
2026-06-09 20:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Probe info outside of xe_info_init() and xe_info_init_early() Patchwork
2026-06-09 22:06 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-06-10 12:22 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-07-01 16:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for drm/xe: Probe info outside of xe_info_init() and xe_info_init_early() (rev2) Patchwork
2026-07-01 17:03 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-07-02 11:47 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-07-02 22:13 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jyrdyr9q.fsf@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=violet.monti@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox