From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/tuning: Use proper register offset for GAMSTLB_CTRL
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 12:36:46 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jyuaoos1.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260410-xe3p_tuning-v1-2-e206a62ee38f@intel.com>
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> writes:
> From Xe2 onward (i.e., all platforms officially supported by the Xe
> driver), the GAMSTLB_CTRL register is located at offset 0x477C and
> represented by the macro "GAMSTLB_CTRL" in code. However the register
> formerly resided at offset 0xCF4C on Xe1-era platforms, and we also have
> macro XEHP_GAMSTLB_CTRL that represents this old offset in the
> unofficial/developer-only Xe1 code. When tuning for the register was
> added for Xe3p_LPG, the old Xe1-era macro was accidentally used instead
> of the proper macro for Xe2 and beyond, causing the tuning to not be
> applied properly. Use the proper definition so that the correct offset
> is written to.
>
> Bspec: 59298
> Fixes: 377c89bfaa5d ("drm/xe/xe3p_lpg: Set STLB bank hash mode to 4KB")
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c
> index ea48e2a60fcd..6fb8887d1482 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tuning.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static const struct xe_rtp_entry_sr gt_tunings[] = {
> { XE_RTP_NAME("Tuning: Set STLB Bank Hash Mode to 4KB"),
> XE_RTP_RULES(GRAPHICS_VERSION_RANGE(3510, XE_RTP_END_VERSION_UNDEFINED),
> IS_INTEGRATED),
> - XE_RTP_ACTIONS(FIELD_SET(XEHP_GAMSTLB_CTRL, BANK_HASH_MODE,
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(FIELD_SET(GAMSTLB_CTRL, BANK_HASH_MODE,
> BANK_HASH_4KB_MODE))
Should we also consolidate the definitions in xe_gt_regs.h into a single
section as well?
In any case,
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
> },
> };
>
> --
> 2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-13 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-10 22:50 [PATCH 0/3] Xe3p tuning and workaround fixes Matt Roper
2026-04-10 22:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/xe/tuning: Stop applying CCCHKNREG1 tuning from Xe3p onward Matt Roper
2026-04-13 15:28 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-10 22:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/xe/tuning: Use proper register offset for GAMSTLB_CTRL Matt Roper
2026-04-13 15:36 ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2026-04-13 19:17 ` Matt Roper
2026-04-13 20:50 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-10 22:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/xe: Mark ROW_CHICKEN5 as a masked register Matt Roper
2026-04-13 15:44 ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-04-10 23:35 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Xe3p tuning and workaround fixes Patchwork
2026-04-11 0:17 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-11 10:51 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-13 19:42 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jyuaoos1.fsf@intel.com \
--to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox