From: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, anshuman.gupta@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com,
aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com,
umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com, frank.scarbrough@intel.com,
sk.anirban@intel.com, "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add a vendor-specific recovery method to device wedged uevent
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 12:20:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b38b102-52ad-4aec-8ca6-0028d731454b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aGYl7IVj5T92VbXh@black.fi.intel.com>
On 7/3/2025 12:10 PM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 10:50:53AM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>> On 7/3/2025 9:36 AM, Raag Jadav wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 07:41:11PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
>>>> Certain errors can cause the device to be wedged and may
>>>> require a vendor specific recovery method to restore normal
>>>> operation.
>>>>
>>>> Add a recovery method 'WEDGED=vendor-specific' for such errors. Vendors
>>>> must provide additional recovery documentation if this method
>>>> is used.
>
> ...
>
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_device.h b/include/drm/drm_device.h
>>>> index 08b3b2467c4c..40a4caaa6313 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_device.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_device.h
>>>> @@ -26,10 +26,14 @@ struct pci_controller;
>>>> * Recovery methods for wedged device in order of less to more side-effects.
>>>> * To be used with drm_dev_wedged_event() as recovery @method. Callers can
>>>> * use any one, multiple (or'd) or none depending on their needs.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * If DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_VENDOR method is used, vendors must provide additional
>>>> + * documentation outlining further recovery steps.
>>>
>>> The original documentation is sufficient so let's not duplicate specific
>>> cases here.
>>
>> Added it here so anyone checking the code directly is aware.
>
> Then a reference to uapi doc would be more useful.
That should be okay. Will do that
Thanks
Riana
>
> Raag
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 14:11 [PATCH v3 0/7] Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add a vendor-specific recovery method to device wedged uevent Riana Tauro
2025-07-03 4:06 ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-03 5:20 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-03 6:40 ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-03 6:50 ` Riana Tauro [this message]
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/xe: Set GT as wedged before sending " Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 21:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-03 4:18 ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-03 5:18 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-03 6:45 ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-07 6:44 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/xe/xe_survivability: Add support for Runtime survivability mode Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 21:40 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-03 5:16 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 23:33 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-09 18:04 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-10 5:27 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 17:30 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe/doc: Document device wedged and runtime survivability Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 13:55 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-03 7:19 ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/xe: Add support to handle hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 17:27 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-10 5:54 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Handle CSC Firmware reported Hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 21:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-03 5:28 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 17:57 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-10 5:38 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add fault injection to trigger csc error handler Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 15:53 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors (rev3) Patchwork
2025-07-02 15:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-07-02 16:17 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-07-02 16:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-07-04 6:45 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b38b102-52ad-4aec-8ca6-0028d731454b@intel.com \
--to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frank.scarbrough@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox