Intel-XE Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, anshuman.gupta@intel.com,
	rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com,
	aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com,
	umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com, frank.scarbrough@intel.com,
	sk.anirban@intel.com, "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add a vendor-specific recovery method to device wedged uevent
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 09:40:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGYl7IVj5T92VbXh@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170d80ad-a12d-4a31-bb6c-abb8a132a689@intel.com>

On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 10:50:53AM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> On 7/3/2025 9:36 AM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 07:41:11PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> > > Certain errors can cause the device to be wedged and may
> > > require a vendor specific recovery method to restore normal
> > > operation.
> > > 
> > > Add a recovery method 'WEDGED=vendor-specific' for such errors. Vendors
> > > must provide additional recovery documentation if this method
> > > is used.

...

> > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_device.h b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> > > index 08b3b2467c4c..40a4caaa6313 100644
> > > --- a/include/drm/drm_device.h
> > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> > > @@ -26,10 +26,14 @@ struct pci_controller;
> > >    * Recovery methods for wedged device in order of less to more side-effects.
> > >    * To be used with drm_dev_wedged_event() as recovery @method. Callers can
> > >    * use any one, multiple (or'd) or none depending on their needs.
> > > + *
> > > + * If DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_VENDOR method is used, vendors must provide additional
> > > + * documentation outlining further recovery steps.
> > 
> > The original documentation is sufficient so let's not duplicate specific
> > cases here.
> 
> Added it here so anyone checking the code directly is aware.

Then a reference to uapi doc would be more useful.

Raag

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-03  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-02 14:11 [PATCH v3 0/7] Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add a vendor-specific recovery method to device wedged uevent Riana Tauro
2025-07-03  4:06   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-03  5:20     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-03  6:40       ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2025-07-03  6:50         ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/xe: Set GT as wedged before sending " Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 21:41   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-03  4:18   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-03  5:18     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-03  6:45       ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-07  6:44         ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/xe/xe_survivability: Add support for Runtime survivability mode Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 21:40   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-03  5:16     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 23:33   ` kernel test robot
2025-07-09 18:04   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-10  5:27     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 17:30       ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe/doc: Document device wedged and runtime survivability Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 13:55   ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-03  7:19   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/xe: Add support to handle hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 17:27   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-10  5:54     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Handle CSC Firmware reported Hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 21:35   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-03  5:28     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 17:57   ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-10  5:38     ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add fault injection to trigger csc error handler Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 15:53 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors (rev3) Patchwork
2025-07-02 15:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-07-02 16:17 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-07-02 16:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-07-04  6:45 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aGYl7IVj5T92VbXh@black.fi.intel.com \
    --to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=frank.scarbrough@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
    --cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox