From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, anshuman.gupta@intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com,
aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com,
umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com, frank.scarbrough@intel.com,
sk.anirban@intel.com, "André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add a vendor-specific recovery method to device wedged uevent
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:06:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGYBu-6bAEc1il4O@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250702141118.3564242-2-riana.tauro@intel.com>
On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 07:41:11PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> Certain errors can cause the device to be wedged and may
> require a vendor specific recovery method to restore normal
> operation.
>
> Add a recovery method 'WEDGED=vendor-specific' for such errors. Vendors
> must provide additional recovery documentation if this method
> is used.
>
> Cc: André Almeida <andrealmeid@igalia.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
> Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Suggested-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 5 ++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 2 ++
> include/drm/drm_device.h | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
> index 263e5a97c080..1ea835a3fc66 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst
> @@ -424,7 +424,9 @@ uevent environment as ``WEDGED=<method1>[,..,<methodN>]`` in order of less to
> more side-effects. If driver is unsure about recovery or method is unknown
> (like soft/hard system reboot, firmware flashing, physical device replacement
> or any other procedure which can't be attempted on the fly), ``WEDGED=unknown``
We may also want to remove the examples for unknown method so that we
don't confuse users in case any of it overlaps with vendor-specific.
> -will be sent instead.
> +will be sent instead. If recovery method is specific to vendor
> +``WEDGED=vendor-specific`` will be sent and userspace should refer to vendor
> +specific documentation for further recovery steps.
>
> Userspace consumers can parse this event and attempt recovery as per the
> following expectations.
> @@ -435,6 +437,7 @@ following expectations.
> none optional telemetry collection
> rebind unbind + bind driver
> bus-reset unbind + bus reset/re-enumeration + bind
> + vendor-specific vendor specific recovery method
> unknown consumer policy
> =============== ========================================
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> index 02556363e918..c72e5c67479d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> @@ -535,6 +535,8 @@ static const char *drm_get_wedge_recovery(unsigned int opt)
> return "rebind";
> case DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_BUS_RESET:
> return "bus-reset";
> + case DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_VENDOR:
> + return "vendor-specific";
> default:
> return NULL;
> }
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_device.h b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> index 08b3b2467c4c..40a4caaa6313 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_device.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> @@ -26,10 +26,14 @@ struct pci_controller;
> * Recovery methods for wedged device in order of less to more side-effects.
> * To be used with drm_dev_wedged_event() as recovery @method. Callers can
> * use any one, multiple (or'd) or none depending on their needs.
> + *
> + * If DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_VENDOR method is used, vendors must provide additional
> + * documentation outlining further recovery steps.
The original documentation is sufficient so let's not duplicate specific
cases here.
Raag
> */
> #define DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_NONE BIT(0) /* optional telemetry collection */
> #define DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_REBIND BIT(1) /* unbind + bind driver */
> #define DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_BUS_RESET BIT(2) /* unbind + reset bus device + bind */
> +#define DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_VENDOR BIT(3) /* vendor specific recovery method */
>
> /**
> * struct drm_wedge_task_info - information about the guilty task of a wedge dev
> --
> 2.47.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 4:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 14:11 [PATCH v3 0/7] Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm: Add a vendor-specific recovery method to device wedged uevent Riana Tauro
2025-07-03 4:06 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2025-07-03 5:20 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-03 6:40 ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-03 6:50 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/xe: Set GT as wedged before sending " Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 21:41 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-03 4:18 ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-03 5:18 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-03 6:45 ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-07 6:44 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/xe/xe_survivability: Add support for Runtime survivability mode Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 21:40 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-03 5:16 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 23:33 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-09 18:04 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-10 5:27 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-15 17:30 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/xe/doc: Document device wedged and runtime survivability Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 13:55 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-03 7:19 ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] drm/xe: Add support to handle hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 17:27 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-10 5:54 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Handle CSC Firmware reported Hardware errors Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 21:35 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-03 5:28 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-09 17:57 ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-10 5:38 ` Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add fault injection to trigger csc error handler Riana Tauro
2025-07-02 15:53 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for Handle Firmware reported Hardware Errors (rev3) Patchwork
2025-07-02 15:54 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-07-02 16:17 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-07-02 16:39 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-07-04 6:45 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aGYBu-6bAEc1il4O@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frank.scarbrough@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sk.anirban@intel.com \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox