From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
To: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
"Piotr Piórkowski" <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>,
"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] drm/xe/guc: Introduce enum with offsets for context register H2Gs
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 19:16:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f7c7bc8-2476-44e2-9821-b47f0edafaca@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250409211340.3046931-4-tomasz.lis@intel.com>
On 09.04.2025 23:13, Tomasz Lis wrote:
> Some GuC messages are constructed with incrementing dword counter
> rather than referencing specific DWORDs, as described in GuC interface
> specification.
>
> This change introduces the definitions of DWORD numbers for parameters
> which will need to be referenced in a CTB parser to be added in a
> following patch. To ensure correctness of these DWORDs, verification
> in form of asserts was added to the message construction code.
>
> v2: Renamed enum members, added ones for single context registration,
> modified asserts to check values rather than indexes.
> v3: Reordered assert args to take less lines
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c | 17 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> index 448afb86e05c..64c71526356e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/abi/guc_actions_abi.h
> @@ -161,6 +161,35 @@ enum xe_guc_preempt_options {
> XE_GUC_PREEMPT_OPTION_DROP_SUBMIT_Q = 0x8,
> };
>
> +enum xe_guc_register_context_param_offsets {
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_0_MBZ = 0,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_1_FLAGS,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_2_CONTEXT_INDEX,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_3_ENGINE_CLASS,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_4_ENGINE_SUBMIT_MASK,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_5_WQ_DESC_ADDR_LOWER,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_6_WQ_DESC_ADDR_UPPER,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_7_WQ_BUF_BASE_LOWER,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_8_WQ_BUF_BASE_UPPER,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_9_WQ_BUF_SIZE,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_10_HW_LRC_ADDR,
> +};
> +
> +enum xe_guc_register_context_multi_lrc_param_offsets {
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_0_MBZ = 0,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_1_FLAGS,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_2_PARENT_CONTEXT,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_3_ENGINE_CLASS,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_4_ENGINE_SUBMIT_MASK,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_5_WQ_DESC_ADDR_LOWER,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_6_WQ_DESC_ADDR_UPPER,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_7_WQ_BUF_BASE_LOWER,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_8_WQ_BUF_BASE_UPPER,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_9_WQ_BUF_SIZE,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_10_NUM_CTXS,
> + XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_11_HW_LRC_ADDR,
> +};
> +
> enum xe_guc_report_status {
> XE_GUC_REPORT_STATUS_UNKNOWN = 0x0,
> XE_GUC_REPORT_STATUS_ACKED = 0x1,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> index 813c3c0bb250..cfc65f21b2f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c
> @@ -487,6 +487,15 @@ static void __register_mlrc_exec_queue(struct xe_guc *guc,
> action[len++] = upper_32_bits(xe_lrc_descriptor(lrc));
> }
>
> + /* explicitly checks some fields that we might fixup later */
> + xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->wq_desc_lo ==
> + action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_5_WQ_DESC_ADDR_LOWER]);
> + xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->wq_base_lo ==
> + action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_7_WQ_BUF_BASE_LOWER]);
> + xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), q->width ==
> + action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_10_NUM_CTXS]);
> + xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->hwlrca_lo ==
> + action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_MULTI_LRC_DATA_11_HW_LRC_ADDR]);
> xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), len <= MAX_MLRC_REG_SIZE);
> #undef MAX_MLRC_REG_SIZE
>
> @@ -511,6 +520,14 @@ static void __register_exec_queue(struct xe_guc *guc,
> info->hwlrca_hi,
> };
>
> + /* explicitly checks some fields that we might fixup later */
> + xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->wq_desc_lo ==
> + action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_5_WQ_DESC_ADDR_LOWER]);
> + xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->wq_base_lo ==
> + action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_7_WQ_BUF_BASE_LOWER]);
> + xe_gt_assert(guc_to_gt(guc), info->hwlrca_lo ==
> + action[XE_GUC_REGISTER_CONTEXT_DATA_10_HW_LRC_ADDR]);
> +
> xe_guc_ct_send(&guc->ct, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action), 0, 0);
> }
>
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 21:13 [PATCH v8 0/4] drm/xe/vf: Post-migration recovery of GGTT nodes and CTB Tomasz Lis
2025-04-09 21:13 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] drm/xe/vf: Divide GGTT ballooning into allocation and insertion Tomasz Lis
2025-04-10 16:54 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-11 14:35 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-04-11 16:32 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-09 21:13 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] drm/xe/vf: Shifting GGTT area post migration Tomasz Lis
2025-04-10 17:13 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-11 14:37 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-04-09 21:13 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] drm/xe/guc: Introduce enum with offsets for context register H2Gs Tomasz Lis
2025-04-10 17:16 ` Michal Wajdeczko [this message]
2025-04-09 21:13 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] drm/xe/vf: Fixup CTB send buffer messages after migration Tomasz Lis
2025-04-10 17:58 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-11 14:39 ` Lis, Tomasz
2025-04-11 16:45 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2025-04-09 21:18 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe/vf: Post-migration recovery of GGTT nodes and CTB (rev7) Patchwork
2025-04-09 21:19 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-09 21:20 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-09 21:26 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-10 12:53 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success " Patchwork
2025-04-10 12:54 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-10 12:55 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-10 13:09 ` ✗ CI.Build: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f7c7bc8-2476-44e2-9821-b47f0edafaca@intel.com \
--to=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
--cc=piotr.piorkowski@intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox