From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>,
Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, christian.koenig@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/sa: Split drm_suballoc_new() into SA alloc and init helpers
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 13:34:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93f01b083861f180838f662fc81a74b14dd17fca.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260204164642.3509298-6-satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
+ dri-devel, Christian
On Wed, 2026-02-04 at 16:46 +0000, Satyanarayana K V P wrote:
> drm_suballoc_new() currently both allocates the SA object using
> kmalloc()
> and searches for a suitable hole in the sub-allocator for the
> requested
> size. Since kmalloc() may take internal locks, performing memory
> allocation while holding the sub-allocator mutex can trigger lockdep
> deadlock warnings.
... As Matt mentioned, This is to be able to suballocate under a
reclaim-tainted lock: Allocation can be done outside the lock, and init
inside the lock.
>
> Fix this by splitting SA allocation from drm_suballoc_new(),
> separating
> object allocation from sub-allocator initialization and hole
> selection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
This must be CC'd dri-devel as well and AMD maintainers.
Below is in addition to MBrost's comments.
>
> ---
> V1 -> V2:
> - Splitted drm_suballoc_new() into drm_suballoc_alloc() and
> drm_suballoc_init() (Thomas).
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_suballoc.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> --
> include/drm/drm_suballoc.h | 8 ++
> 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_suballoc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_suballoc.c
> index 879ea33dbbc4..6f21f9e048d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_suballoc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_suballoc.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static void drm_suballoc_remove_locked(struct
> drm_suballoc *sa)
> list_del_init(&sa->olist);
> list_del_init(&sa->flist);
> dma_fence_put(sa->fence);
> - kfree(sa);
> + drm_suballoc_release(sa);
> }
>
> static void drm_suballoc_try_free(struct drm_suballoc_manager
> *sa_manager)
> @@ -293,45 +293,75 @@ static bool drm_suballoc_next_hole(struct
> drm_suballoc_manager *sa_manager,
> }
>
> /**
> - * drm_suballoc_new() - Make a suballocation.
> + * drm_suballoc_alloc() - Allocate uninitialized suballoc object.
> + * @gfp: gfp flags used for memory allocation.
> + *
> + * Allocate memory for an uninitialized suballoc object. Intended
> usage is
> + * allocate memory for suballoc object outside of a reclaim tainted
> context
> + * and then be initialized at a later time in a reclaim tainted
> context.
> + *
> + * @drm_suballoc_release should be used to release the memory if
> returned
> + * suballoc object is in uninitialized state.
> + *
> + * Return: a new uninitialized suballoc object, or an ERR_PTR(-
> ENOMEM).
> + */
> +struct drm_suballoc *drm_suballoc_alloc(gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> + struct drm_suballoc *sa;
> +
> + sa = kmalloc(sizeof(*sa), gfp);
> + if (!sa)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + return sa;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_suballoc_alloc);
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_suballoc_release() - Release memory for suballocation.
> + * @sa: The struct drm_suballoc.
> + */
> +void drm_suballoc_release(struct drm_suballoc *sa)
> +{
> + kfree(sa);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_suballoc_release);
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_suballoc_init() - Initialize a suballocation.
> * @sa_manager: pointer to the sa_manager
> + * @sa: The struct drm_suballoc.
> * @size: number of bytes we want to suballocate.
> - * @gfp: gfp flags used for memory allocation. Typically GFP_KERNEL
> but
> - * the argument is provided for suballocations from reclaim
> context or
> - * where the caller wants to avoid pipelining rather than wait
> for
> - * reclaim.
> * @intr: Whether to perform waits interruptible. This should
> typically
> * always be true, unless the caller needs to propagate a
> * non-interruptible context from above layers.
> * @align: Alignment. Must not exceed the default manager alignment.
> * If @align is zero, then the manager alignment is used.
> + * @timeout: Time to a wait suballocation to become available.
I think we should split out the timeout to a separate patch, since that
is not really related to the problem of the lockdep splat, and it would
require a separate motivation, since typically the CTRL-C in
combination with fence timeouts are sufficient. We need to explain why
that's not the case for this particuar use-case.
Also that would make the -fixes patches for the reclaim lockdep splat
smaller.
Otherwise LGTM.
Thomas
> *
> - * Try to make a suballocation of size @size, which will be rounded
> - * up to the alignment specified in specified in
> drm_suballoc_manager_init().
> + * Try to make a suballocation on a pre-allocated suballoc object of
> size @size,
> + * which will be rounded up to the alignment specified in specified
> in
> + * drm_suballoc_manager_init().
> *
> - * Return: a new suballocated bo, or an ERR_PTR.
> + * Return: zero on success, errno on failure.
> */
> -struct drm_suballoc *
> -drm_suballoc_new(struct drm_suballoc_manager *sa_manager, size_t
> size,
> - gfp_t gfp, bool intr, size_t align)
> +int drm_suballoc_init(struct drm_suballoc_manager *sa_manager,
> + struct drm_suballoc *sa, size_t size,
> + bool intr, size_t align, signed long timeout)
> {
> struct dma_fence *fences[DRM_SUBALLOC_MAX_QUEUES];
> unsigned int tries[DRM_SUBALLOC_MAX_QUEUES];
> unsigned int count;
> int i, r;
> - struct drm_suballoc *sa;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(align > sa_manager->align))
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + return -EINVAL;
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > sa_manager->size || !size))
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!align)
> align = sa_manager->align;
>
> - sa = kmalloc(sizeof(*sa), gfp);
> - if (!sa)
> - return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> sa->manager = sa_manager;
> sa->fence = NULL;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sa->olist);
> @@ -339,6 +369,8 @@ drm_suballoc_new(struct drm_suballoc_manager
> *sa_manager, size_t size,
>
> spin_lock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
> do {
> + long t;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < DRM_SUBALLOC_MAX_QUEUES; ++i)
> tries[i] = 0;
>
> @@ -348,7 +380,7 @@ drm_suballoc_new(struct drm_suballoc_manager
> *sa_manager, size_t size,
> if (drm_suballoc_try_alloc(sa_manager, sa,
> size, align)) {
> spin_unlock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
> - return sa;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* see if we can skip over some allocations
> */
> @@ -359,34 +391,75 @@ drm_suballoc_new(struct drm_suballoc_manager
> *sa_manager, size_t size,
> fences[count++] =
> dma_fence_get(fences[i]);
>
> if (count) {
> - long t;
> -
> spin_unlock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
> t = dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(fences,
> count, intr,
> -
> MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT,
> - NULL);
> + timeout,
> NULL);
> for (i = 0; i < count; ++i)
> dma_fence_put(fences[i]);
>
> - r = (t > 0) ? 0 : t;
> spin_lock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
> } else if (intr) {
> + spin_unlock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
> /* if we have nothing to wait for block */
> - r = wait_event_interruptible_locked
> + r = wait_event_interruptible_timeout
> (sa_manager->wq,
> - __drm_suballoc_event(sa_manager,
> size, align));
> + __drm_suballoc_event(sa_manager,
> size, align),
> + timeout);
> + spin_lock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
> } else {
> spin_unlock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
> - wait_event(sa_manager->wq,
> - drm_suballoc_event(sa_manager,
> size, align));
> - r = 0;
> + t = wait_event_timeout
> + (sa_manager->wq,
> + drm_suballoc_event(sa_manager,
> size, align),
> + timeout);
> spin_lock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
> }
> + r = (t > 0) ? 0 : !r ? -ETIME : t;
> } while (!r);
>
> spin_unlock(&sa_manager->wq.lock);
> - kfree(sa);
> - return ERR_PTR(r);
> + return r;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_suballoc_init);
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_suballoc_new() - Make a suballocation.
> + * @sa_manager: pointer to the sa_manager
> + * @size: number of bytes we want to suballocate.
> + * @gfp: gfp flags used for memory allocation. Typically GFP_KERNEL
> but
> + * the argument is provided for suballocations from reclaim
> context or
> + * where the caller wants to avoid pipelining rather than wait
> for
> + * reclaim.
> + * @intr: Whether to perform waits interruptible. This should
> typically
> + * always be true, unless the caller needs to propagate a
> + * non-interruptible context from above layers.
> + * @align: Alignment. Must not exceed the default manager alignment.
> + * If @align is zero, then the manager alignment is used.
> + *
> + * Try to make a suballocation of size @size, which will be rounded
> + * up to the alignment specified in specified in
> drm_suballoc_manager_init().
> + *
> + * Return: a new suballocated bo, or an ERR_PTR.
> + */
> +struct drm_suballoc *
> +drm_suballoc_new(struct drm_suballoc_manager *sa_manager, size_t
> size,
> + gfp_t gfp, bool intr, size_t align)
> +{
> + struct drm_suballoc *sa;
> + int err;
> +
> + sa = drm_suballoc_alloc(gfp);
> + if (IS_ERR(sa))
> + return sa;
> +
> + err = drm_suballoc_init(sa_manager, sa, size, intr, align,
> + MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> + if (err) {
> + drm_suballoc_release(sa);
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> + }
> +
> + return sa;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_suballoc_new);
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_suballoc.h b/include/drm/drm_suballoc.h
> index 7ba72a81a808..cff0e14556d1 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_suballoc.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_suballoc.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,14 @@ void drm_suballoc_manager_init(struct
> drm_suballoc_manager *sa_manager,
>
> void drm_suballoc_manager_fini(struct drm_suballoc_manager
> *sa_manager);
>
> +struct drm_suballoc *drm_suballoc_alloc(gfp_t gfp);
> +
> +void drm_suballoc_release(struct drm_suballoc *sa);
> +
> +int drm_suballoc_init(struct drm_suballoc_manager *sa_manager,
> + struct drm_suballoc *sa, size_t size, bool
> intr,
> + size_t align, signed long timeout);
> +
> struct drm_suballoc *
> drm_suballoc_new(struct drm_suballoc_manager *sa_manager, size_t
> size,
> gfp_t gfp, bool intr, size_t align);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-06 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-04 16:46 [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix fs_reclaim deadlock caused by CCS save/restore Satyanarayana K V P
2026-02-04 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/sa: Split drm_suballoc_new() into SA alloc and init helpers Satyanarayana K V P
2026-02-04 19:45 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-06 12:34 ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2026-02-06 15:27 ` Christian König
2026-02-04 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/xe/sa: Add lockdep annotations for SA manager swap_guard Satyanarayana K V P
2026-02-04 19:11 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-06 16:17 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-06 18:28 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-09 9:09 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-09 17:07 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-04 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/xe/vf: Fix fs_reclaim warning with CCS save/restore BB allocation Satyanarayana K V P
2026-02-04 19:18 ` Matthew Brost
2026-02-06 12:49 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-02-05 2:49 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Fix fs_reclaim deadlock caused by CCS save/restore (rev2) Patchwork
2026-02-05 3:24 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-02-05 18:34 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93f01b083861f180838f662fc81a74b14dd17fca.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
--cc=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox